From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:38:11 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#18655 <18655@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#18655 <18655@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Regression in 3.3 documentation versus 3.2 Reply-To: bug#18655 <18655@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2025 01:38:11 +0000 retitle 18655 Regression in 3.3 documentation versus 3.2 reassign 18655 diffutils submitter 18655 Richard Wilbur severity 18655 normal tag 18655 notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 07 11:15:56 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2014 15:15:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36794 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbWUW-0004HA-2a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:15:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45847) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbWE5-0003pV-Qu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:58:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbWE4-0000Wg-Gx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:58:57 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:34139) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbWE4-0000Wb-Ey for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:58:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47554) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbWE3-0002Rz-Gq for bug-diffutils@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:58:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbWDy-0000V3-O6 for bug-diffutils@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:58:55 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]:47200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbWDy-0000Uf-Gn for bug-diffutils@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:58:50 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ge10so6414280lab.24 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 07:58:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HHm03HQ3xgMNzyvJyrFEoKp7z/b4WOjIu/ke61wYSz8=; b=tuXTtld5+ZEiatwihCCA9DFlMa/IxwoOB3Ox+g8rkc7olN6n8OfFyeR/R2WH785bwn PWfnoGkq3GVt/krQrBuEAUjhKUFtAyW9Xm8goUyb5b3xWne4MaNJutrW03dxvoSAHb+0 JIN38+H5LBiiuhDInp44exXNmnSvKhNH2gDdw7KB9uO9rSs7XIpzXO7U/F6lnJyBxsc/ JB9Su5mS7ZuxtjFJiMMOvFg6YU70kSY/y8oWyRY5Xx7zM9YLP8CRkIPVBqIi2Zz4Xmee RH1lO17tzX46NlXRTXaT+pPuYhAlVqak6yNrIA8HQblFfxyKPtW2m69PVAp0W68sYnPt 3BvQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.134.229 with SMTP id pn5mr4544567lbb.22.1412693928676; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 07:58:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.167.7 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 07:58:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 08:58:48 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Regression in 3.3 documentation versus 3.2 From: Richard Wilbur To: bug-diffutils@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:15:53 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) GNU diff v3.3 drops documentation for the '--forward-ed' option, but still supports it. We noticed this while trying to update GNU diff support in bzr (the bazaar distributed version control system)[*]. Richard Wilbur mailto:richard.wilbur@gmail.com [*] http://bazaar.canonical.com/en/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 07 12:00:23 2014 Received: (at 18655) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2014 16:00:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36830 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbXBW-0005Nl-Ti for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 12:00:23 -0400 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:58053) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbXBT-0005Nb-Ij for 18655@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 12:00:20 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5E239E8013; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:00:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id movFB+GSQqKq; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:00:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF8E0A60003; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54340E02.1090104@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:00:02 -0700 From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Wilbur , 18655@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#18655: Regression in 3.3 documentation versus 3.2 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18655 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) On 10/07/2014 07:58 AM, Richard Wilbur wrote: > GNU diff v3.3 drops documentation for the '--forward-ed' option It's documented in the full manual. It's not in the short version because it's a useless option that nobody in their right mind would ever want to use. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 30 22:04:32 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2016 02:04:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awgkK-0001xP-FU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 22:04:32 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]:34265) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awgkI-0001xC-Sk for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 22:04:31 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f44.google.com with SMTP id k142so157579669oib.1 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:04:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GrqNzleNMx7JxUTmUDHXZ4gKGmURqe04d1ZE4ScEAtA=; b=pNI0phi328rAofQbJ7asZw1QbP4cwYV4ybEKlcevEttL3C5eBqY8GOZjkVXYqhFb+A t17dbvAFyF1BPSi/iK90CIP+BdrXQ+7witM0oDaPnL+33mApyIdV2dclxumBXbh4jpRc aRezxCt3V1BrMhzG9Pw81FD82rdEhRW8zvhGcyyiQYYO0efsJYCtgiL6Ymx3IoDCyfef hr0CvLKWcUe9a8wG4eBfCSgobOvQyruPZmQKyOpOjwarYQHNMPl4EmO3fg36tUEULcX+ QcooIIpxneGjuR057UyZ/5rtzks+RTYBGb1eifcpzJC9ckQEw3FYUHIC3tX/I8vlyJL/ zHAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=GrqNzleNMx7JxUTmUDHXZ4gKGmURqe04d1ZE4ScEAtA=; b=U+He0z9vbkukTSCAX/PxJeh1zIrWMO7zMiDTf6rdzBhD5OfM7t70kvVcYAYr6c5dfE dYIM51+EgbDO/vlUaI5RzotvOyByyUOhTKr5xc41faHz+HUSnQP9x7A1vLLTBe6xWRkU g9+MUcLwM/FFRmKj8r+t8A/Pe/P5bU5C2T3h5Vi63lH+6Hv17xnodFTIRHabRZcDXOtL ofcqztoRjeXu2sGwzQNhj/0P5E/tekNBUFxYeNAmD10FSz9yY0/7qFentFb/fRd3pq8W MjfgFuiyW6+Tv4pDD+84hI7naTAfmOX9S5fQQP37RTNu4SjD8RGEs3x4IB2jWsfYWgoy Tzqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXtLvS9hJYrfl9ILbvupScV6WHGdzMfUksSUaRUKPOd80agjWYol8uFlMnvBdyj0ylBFc+qZnMnoLdNpA== X-Received: by 10.202.102.36 with SMTP id a36mr10894962oic.122.1462068265546; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:04:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.175.193 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:04:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Meyering Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:04:05 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JbrXAQv4dFmsx7c9LF-siFTJhcI Message-ID: Subject: To: GNU bug tracker automated control server Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 18655 notabug close 18655 [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.218.44 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (meyering[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.218.44 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 18655 notabug close 18655 [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.218.44 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.218.44 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (meyering[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different tags 18655 notabug close 18655 From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:38:11 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 11:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator