From unknown Wed Aug 20 01:20:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#18642: preparing for a new release Resent-From: Jim Meyering Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-grep@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 04:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 18642 X-GNU-PR-Package: grep X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-grep@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.141256885018992 (code B ref -1); Mon, 06 Oct 2014 04:15:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2014 04:14:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35151 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgX-0004wF-Mx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55035) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgV-0004w5-Li for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgU-0000Rx-Ly for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:07 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:48526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgU-0000Rt-Iu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56747) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgT-0001eL-JY for bug-grep@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgS-0000Qt-FE for bug-grep@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:47134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgS-0000QM-8u for bug-grep@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:04 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hi2so3359434wib.2 for ; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:14:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=nY/35WftOIhFCCrLykkO8Ep3H2J53dnJEvdeNRJbHsA=; b=to5FBYrNjON7PshjRt82i6AA1gyc6JPLEap6t801fNK97hclcFn29ZcjR7cMnQrjii wCUC65alIAnsvXNUrDWP+x58tDvQSLls9fvEW1uDGeyiRXkDAgdQI3dZFhquTEWp+2eF 6c6btegN2SrkwsPjKZ6BVougmVcEAKBP1Wl3NpXbxGRZCtntVw43GKSP7XVjt2T9MivD rEpsbzNbn5G6DoBuNbQ1QKYBD/VjQuL0eQtNeAkmSV9aDuntLwraOqcQkitkpC4GoAMm V8NJb8JA4Tgd5pvGYKExdMDiaNSjFSwiiwB6GXQTnQYu/7kSgvr1e1SxfWbxFI101b2b 4zlg== X-Received: by 10.194.3.42 with SMTP id 10mr26550056wjz.98.1412568842935; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:14:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.86.131 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:13:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Meyering Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:13:42 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: U3jdnnLpr4wRpcTTdDGKAbDQBAE Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Norihiro's latest fix is for a bug that is significant enough that I would feel remiss not to make a release soon. Here is one patch that looks worth including: #17715 dfa: build struct dfamust on demand Any other suggestions for changes to be included? From unknown Wed Aug 20 01:20:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#18642: preparing for a new release Resent-From: Norihiro Tanaka Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-grep@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18642 X-GNU-PR-Package: grep X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jim Meyering Cc: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 18642-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18642.141261049424443 (code B ref 18642); Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:49:01 +0000 Received: (at 18642) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2014 15:48:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35931 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbAWD-0006MA-Cc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:48:13 -0400 Received: from mailgw05.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.7.212]:54469) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbAWA-0006M1-Jz for 18642@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:48:11 -0400 Received: from imp02 (mailgw6.kcn.ne.jp [61.86.15.232]) by mailgw05.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A5067AA5 for <18642@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 00:48:08 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail09.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.6.188]) by imp02 with bizsmtp id zro81o00G43QJrh01ro82s; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:48:08 +0900 X-OrgRCPT: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org Received: from [10.120.1.60] (i118-21-128-66.s30.a048.ap.plala.or.jp [118.21.128.66]) by mail09.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7C1591BD009D; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 00:48:08 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:48:07 +0900 From: Norihiro Tanaka In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <20141007004806.9AB1.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.65.07 [ja] X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Jim Meyering wrote: > Norihiro's latest fix is for a bug that is significant enough > that I would feel remiss not to make a release soon. > > Here is one patch that looks worth including: > #17715 dfa: build struct dfamust on demand > > Any other suggestions for changes to be included? > Thanks. I sent a patch to fix a potential bug. Could you review it? http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18645 From unknown Wed Aug 20 01:20:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#18642: preparing for a new release Resent-From: Jim Meyering Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-grep@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18642 X-GNU-PR-Package: grep X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Norihiro Tanaka Cc: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 18642-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18642.141262385113990 (code B ref 18642); Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:31:01 +0000 Received: (at 18642) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2014 19:30:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36018 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbDze-0003dY-Jo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:30:50 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:34296) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbDzc-0003dO-Ri for 18642@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:30:49 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id d1so5712977wiv.2 for <18642@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:30:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=/zZHlXYQ8j+RTs9PC0qmKEz69sgIOIJpAA8FoqOiKAw=; b=n4H1JXlf4V/39qeSQwlZdWznV7j4wVfxL5yPMm9ylDiWk4xp9BYYQF/JeHTJnlqeqj LDeFvWQvhV8VQO8epitM9pcSL/QarPGS8CKATNsEQ/GZRqOBZ1IAKppV4w7coKbhdfba VGNnjhlHYcC837Mti2C0spD2iSaEV8J9E4na+1AVgJmo4Gfclg2WEOZcKko4fV6xt8bZ 3+5DsNtuIqdaINx4e4cQ7VHSZjOp2RaffYrkx2HDN83YrHFvmaQU47my8VeOd0mmJffV pDmbYsVLfnBWm9Q8djxPM8Ot75ZZXPd7dxXA/2FKQ/yszb+Rh2/gCvorNHCkmOiqpMEV DbgQ== X-Received: by 10.180.91.19 with SMTP id ca19mr22113187wib.19.1412623848076; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:30:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.86.131 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 12:30:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20141007004806.9AB1.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> References: <20141007004806.9AB1.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> From: Jim Meyering Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 12:30:28 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: N65nvpMUMpK7saMQ_hgPOzEGulY Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> Norihiro's latest fix is for a bug that is significant enough >> that I would feel remiss not to make a release soon. >> >> Here is one patch that looks worth including: >> #17715 dfa: build struct dfamust on demand >> >> Any other suggestions for changes to be included? >> > > Thanks. I sent a patch to fix a potential bug. Could you review it? > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18645 As you know, for any bug fix, we try hard to provide the following: - test case - NEWS entry describing the problem and identifying affected releases - a commit log attributing the precise commit that introduced the bug Can you provide at least a test case? BTW, I still have not attributed the commit between 2.19 and 2.20 for the most recently described (in NEWS) bug fix. From unknown Wed Aug 20 01:20:39 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Jim Meyering Subject: bug#18642: closed (Re: bug#18642: preparing for a new release) Message-ID: References: <20141007233733.7DCF.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 18642 X-Gnu-PR-Package: grep Reply-To: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:38:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1412692682-12717-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1412692682-12717-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #18642: preparing for a new release which was filed against the grep package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 18642@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 18642: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D18642 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1412692682-12717-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 18642-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2014 14:37:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36738 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbVtU-0003Ia-Pf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:37:41 -0400 Received: from mailgw06.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.7.213]:57360) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbVtS-0003IQ-0w for 18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:37:39 -0400 Received: from imp02 (mailgw6.kcn.ne.jp [61.86.15.232]) by mailgw06.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE23E80021 for <18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 23:37:35 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail07.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.6.186]) by imp02 with bizsmtp id 0Edb1p00840oyB901Edbj2; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:37:35 +0900 X-OrgRCPT: 18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: from [10.120.1.38] (i118-21-128-66.s30.a048.ap.plala.or.jp [118.21.128.66]) by mail07.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2DC86D5009A; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 23:37:35 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:37:33 +0900 From: Norihiro Tanaka To: Jim Meyering Subject: Re: bug#18642: preparing for a new release In-Reply-To: References: <20141007004806.9AB1.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> Message-Id: <20141007233733.7DCF.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.65.07 [ja] X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18642-done Cc: 18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Jim Meyering wrote: > As you know, for any bug fix, we try hard to provide the following: > > - test case > - NEWS entry describing the problem and identifying affected releases > - a commit log attributing the precise commit that introduced the bug > > Can you provide at least a test case? > > BTW, I still have not attributed the commit between 2.19 and 2.20 > for the most recently described (in NEWS) bug fix. Sorry, I investigated many cases, but I couldn't find it. When this bug is reproduced, must be s == 0 and s1 > 0 and d->newlines[s] != d->newlines[s1]. In addition, they mustn't be updated until reaches a next newline. I believe that all of them is never filled at the same time. So I think once I close the bug without fix. ------------=_1412692682-12717-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2014 04:14:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35151 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgX-0004wF-Mx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55035) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgV-0004w5-Li for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgU-0000Rx-Ly for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:07 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:48526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgU-0000Rt-Iu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56747) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgT-0001eL-JY for bug-grep@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgS-0000Qt-FE for bug-grep@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:47134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgS-0000QM-8u for bug-grep@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:04 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hi2so3359434wib.2 for ; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:14:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=nY/35WftOIhFCCrLykkO8Ep3H2J53dnJEvdeNRJbHsA=; b=to5FBYrNjON7PshjRt82i6AA1gyc6JPLEap6t801fNK97hclcFn29ZcjR7cMnQrjii wCUC65alIAnsvXNUrDWP+x58tDvQSLls9fvEW1uDGeyiRXkDAgdQI3dZFhquTEWp+2eF 6c6btegN2SrkwsPjKZ6BVougmVcEAKBP1Wl3NpXbxGRZCtntVw43GKSP7XVjt2T9MivD rEpsbzNbn5G6DoBuNbQ1QKYBD/VjQuL0eQtNeAkmSV9aDuntLwraOqcQkitkpC4GoAMm V8NJb8JA4Tgd5pvGYKExdMDiaNSjFSwiiwB6GXQTnQYu/7kSgvr1e1SxfWbxFI101b2b 4zlg== X-Received: by 10.194.3.42 with SMTP id 10mr26550056wjz.98.1412568842935; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:14:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.86.131 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:13:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Meyering Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:13:42 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: U3jdnnLpr4wRpcTTdDGKAbDQBAE Message-ID: Subject: preparing for a new release To: bug-grep@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Norihiro's latest fix is for a bug that is significant enough that I would feel remiss not to make a release soon. Here is one patch that looks worth including: #17715 dfa: build struct dfamust on demand Any other suggestions for changes to be included? ------------=_1412692682-12717-1-- From unknown Wed Aug 20 01:20:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#18642: preparing for a new release Resent-From: Norihiro Tanaka Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-grep@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 22:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18642 X-GNU-PR-Package: grep X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Jim Meyering Received: via spool by 18642-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18642.141280812222767 (code B ref 18642); Wed, 08 Oct 2014 22:43:01 +0000 Received: (at 18642) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2014 22:42:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38309 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xbzvl-0005ur-8e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:42:01 -0400 Received: from mailgw05.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.7.212]:60486) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xbzvi-0005ug-4O for 18642@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:41:58 -0400 Received: from imp02 (mailgw6.kcn.ne.jp [61.86.15.232]) by mailgw05.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC05468088 for <18642@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 07:41:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail07.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.6.186]) by imp02 with bizsmtp id 0mhw1p00q40oyB901mhwuD; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 07:41:56 +0900 X-OrgRCPT: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org Received: from [10.120.1.55] (i118-21-128-66.s30.a048.ap.plala.or.jp [118.21.128.66]) by mail07.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 96585D5009A; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 07:41:56 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 07:41:56 +0900 From: Norihiro Tanaka In-Reply-To: <20141007233733.7DCF.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> References: <20141007233733.7DCF.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> Message-Id: <20141009074155.819D.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.65.07 [ja] X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > Sorry, I investigated many cases, but I couldn't find it. > > When this bug is reproduced, must be s == 0 and s1 > 0 and > d->newlines[s] != d->newlines[s1]. In addition, they mustn't be > updated until reaches a next newline. > > I believe that all of them is never filled at the same time. So I think > once I close the bug without fix. Sorry, I have closed bug#18642 instead of bug#18645 by my mistake. This bug isn't done. Can you re-open it? From unknown Wed Aug 20 01:20:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#18642: preparing for a new release Resent-From: Jim Meyering Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-grep@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 03:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18642 X-GNU-PR-Package: grep X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Norihiro Tanaka Cc: 18642 <18642@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 18642-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18642.141282584424890 (code B ref 18642); Thu, 09 Oct 2014 03:38:01 +0000 Received: (at 18642) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2014 03:37:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38396 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc4Xb-0006TO-Qc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:37:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:62022) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc4XZ-0006TC-RW for 18642@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:37:22 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id k14so313466wgh.31 for <18642@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 20:37:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=kkN1vvKgDF2yY61IZgx6IXWRzC5rsTQ4T7VkBiRoEqI=; b=oEtBfzJOtpdaeuocENGsz91wv1WEk+pG8u8O6u/Jakdnc9OVVCvdU6zxRUBmwnRAYD bwKzLfZRxoEJmrEggAjej5f/qiUBgSEp6TWnQG/67hefFw8/XmHUUuc2EIKyjxYTkckL PF3OyplxAVX+KxqWwtyN7kmM+U560Aix+yg3ES8xfn1H7qq9EXWylOXTATv3AhxKYLXw 95mc/erD7QtHnrGToJokFRsBYLlMxWw9L4gtscYK7hALnTKijXjRlnx15FfujOPeciZw zsGixMYLQoRLaBo/NWE4FD6Df/0+sdkt18tR3tUnJmQiKDvyf+3lQbfiVQHspQv+5d9l EDng== X-Received: by 10.194.8.232 with SMTP id u8mr15615947wja.64.1412825840988; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 20:37:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.86.131 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:37:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20141009074155.819D.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> References: <20141007233733.7DCF.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> <20141009074155.819D.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> From: Jim Meyering Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:37:00 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YJnLH8wYT-vp8xTZSGEGY1Qhlt0 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > Norihiro Tanaka wrote: >> Sorry, I investigated many cases, but I couldn't find it. >> >> When this bug is reproduced, must be s == 0 and s1 > 0 and >> d->newlines[s] != d->newlines[s1]. In addition, they mustn't be >> updated until reaches a next newline. >> >> I believe that all of them is never filled at the same time. So I think >> once I close the bug without fix. > > Sorry, I have closed bug#18642 instead of bug#18645 by my mistake. This > bug isn't done. Can you re-open it? 18642 was auto-filed for my message saying I want to make a release soon. That is not an issue that deserves to have an open bug number, so it is fine that you closed it. From unknown Wed Aug 20 01:20:39 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Jim Meyering Subject: bug#18642: closed (Re: bug#18642: preparing for a new release) Message-ID: References: <54360F78.70504@cs.ucla.edu> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 18642 X-Gnu-PR-Package: grep Reply-To: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 04:32:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1412829122-30459-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1412829122-30459-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #18642: preparing for a new release which was filed against the grep package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 18642@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 18642: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D18642 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1412829122-30459-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 18642-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2014 04:31:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38409 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc5NV-0007tg-Q2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:31:02 -0400 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:41352) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc5NT-0007tP-0l for 18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:30:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7408A60005; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:30:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7PyXJptyWGSf; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-71-177-17-123.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.177.17.123]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16FB639E8014; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54360F78.70504@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:30:48 -0700 From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Meyering , Norihiro Tanaka Subject: Re: bug#18642: preparing for a new release References: <20141007233733.7DCF.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> <20141009074155.819D.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18642-done Cc: 18642 <18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Jim Meyering wrote: > it > is fine that you closed it. Hah! And I reopened it at his request. Closing it again. ------------=_1412829122-30459-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2014 04:14:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35151 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgX-0004wF-Mx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55035) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgV-0004w5-Li for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgU-0000Rx-Ly for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:07 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:48526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgU-0000Rt-Iu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56747) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgT-0001eL-JY for bug-grep@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgS-0000Qt-FE for bug-grep@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:47134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgS-0000QM-8u for bug-grep@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:04 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hi2so3359434wib.2 for ; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:14:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=nY/35WftOIhFCCrLykkO8Ep3H2J53dnJEvdeNRJbHsA=; b=to5FBYrNjON7PshjRt82i6AA1gyc6JPLEap6t801fNK97hclcFn29ZcjR7cMnQrjii wCUC65alIAnsvXNUrDWP+x58tDvQSLls9fvEW1uDGeyiRXkDAgdQI3dZFhquTEWp+2eF 6c6btegN2SrkwsPjKZ6BVougmVcEAKBP1Wl3NpXbxGRZCtntVw43GKSP7XVjt2T9MivD rEpsbzNbn5G6DoBuNbQ1QKYBD/VjQuL0eQtNeAkmSV9aDuntLwraOqcQkitkpC4GoAMm V8NJb8JA4Tgd5pvGYKExdMDiaNSjFSwiiwB6GXQTnQYu/7kSgvr1e1SxfWbxFI101b2b 4zlg== X-Received: by 10.194.3.42 with SMTP id 10mr26550056wjz.98.1412568842935; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:14:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.86.131 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:13:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Meyering Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:13:42 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: U3jdnnLpr4wRpcTTdDGKAbDQBAE Message-ID: Subject: preparing for a new release To: bug-grep@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Norihiro's latest fix is for a bug that is significant enough that I would feel remiss not to make a release soon. Here is one patch that looks worth including: #17715 dfa: build struct dfamust on demand Any other suggestions for changes to be included? ------------=_1412829122-30459-1-- From unknown Wed Aug 20 01:20:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#18642: preparing for a new release Resent-From: Norihiro Tanaka Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-grep@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18642 X-GNU-PR-Package: grep X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Eggert Cc: Jim Meyering , 18642 <18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D18642.141286209828298 (code D ref 18642); Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:42:01 +0000 Received: (at 18642-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2014 13:41:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38694 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XcDyL-0007MI-Nb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:41:38 -0400 Received: from mailgw04.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.7.211]:55963) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XcDyH-0007M7-Qr for 18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:41:35 -0400 Received: from imp02 (mailgw6.kcn.ne.jp [61.86.15.232]) by mailgw04.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DBE6C1BFB for <18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:41:31 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail01.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.6.180]) by imp02 with bizsmtp id 11hX1p0063t2w9Z011hXmJ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 22:41:31 +0900 X-OrgRCPT: 18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: from [10.120.1.71] (i118-21-128-66.s30.a048.ap.plala.or.jp [118.21.128.66]) by mail01.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2F8D85A82D3; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:41:31 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 22:41:31 +0900 From: Norihiro Tanaka In-Reply-To: <54360F78.70504@cs.ucla.edu> References: <54360F78.70504@cs.ucla.edu> Message-Id: <20141009224130.C12C.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.65.07 [ja] X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Paul Eggert wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: > > it > > is fine that you closed it. > > Hah! And I reopened it at his request. Closing it again. Thanks. I'a sorry to confuse you. From unknown Wed Aug 20 01:20:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#18642: preparing for a new release Resent-From: Norihiro Tanaka Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-grep@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 23:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18642 X-GNU-PR-Package: grep X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jim Meyering Cc: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 18642-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18642.141402150126298 (code B ref 18642); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 23:45:02 +0000 Received: (at 18642) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2014 23:45:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60304 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xh5aO-0006q5-NS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:45:01 -0400 Received: from mailgw06.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.7.213]:58561) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xh5aL-0006pq-76 for 18642@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:44:58 -0400 Received: from imp01 (mailgw5.kcn.ne.jp [61.86.15.231]) by mailgw06.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E80C8007 for <18642@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:44:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail07.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.6.186]) by imp01 with bizsmtp id 6Pkq1p00D40oyB901PkqCS; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:44:50 +0900 X-OrgRCPT: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org Received: from [10.120.1.60] (i118-21-128-66.s30.a048.ap.plala.or.jp [118.21.128.66]) by mail07.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B2ADCD5009B; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:44:50 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:44:48 +0900 From: Norihiro Tanaka In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <20141023084448.A43E.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.65.07 [ja] X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Jim Meyering wrote: > Norihiro's latest fix is for a bug that is significant enough > that I would feel remiss not to make a release soon. > > Here is one patch that looks worth including: > #17715 dfa: build struct dfamust on demand > > Any other suggestions for changes to be included? Although I submitted some patches after received this message, reak bugs are bug#18631 and bug#18685, and bug#18631 doesn't affair for users. So, I think that only bug#18685 should be fixed until a next release.