From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 06 00:14:10 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2014 04:14:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35151 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgX-0004wF-Mx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55035) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgV-0004w5-Li for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgU-0000Rx-Ly for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:07 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:48526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgU-0000Rt-Iu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56747) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgT-0001eL-JY for bug-grep@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgS-0000Qt-FE for bug-grep@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:47134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XazgS-0000QM-8u for bug-grep@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:14:04 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hi2so3359434wib.2 for ; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:14:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=nY/35WftOIhFCCrLykkO8Ep3H2J53dnJEvdeNRJbHsA=; b=to5FBYrNjON7PshjRt82i6AA1gyc6JPLEap6t801fNK97hclcFn29ZcjR7cMnQrjii wCUC65alIAnsvXNUrDWP+x58tDvQSLls9fvEW1uDGeyiRXkDAgdQI3dZFhquTEWp+2eF 6c6btegN2SrkwsPjKZ6BVougmVcEAKBP1Wl3NpXbxGRZCtntVw43GKSP7XVjt2T9MivD rEpsbzNbn5G6DoBuNbQ1QKYBD/VjQuL0eQtNeAkmSV9aDuntLwraOqcQkitkpC4GoAMm V8NJb8JA4Tgd5pvGYKExdMDiaNSjFSwiiwB6GXQTnQYu/7kSgvr1e1SxfWbxFI101b2b 4zlg== X-Received: by 10.194.3.42 with SMTP id 10mr26550056wjz.98.1412568842935; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:14:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.86.131 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:13:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Meyering Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:13:42 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: U3jdnnLpr4wRpcTTdDGKAbDQBAE Message-ID: Subject: preparing for a new release To: bug-grep@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Norihiro's latest fix is for a bug that is significant enough that I would feel remiss not to make a release soon. Here is one patch that looks worth including: #17715 dfa: build struct dfamust on demand Any other suggestions for changes to be included? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 06 11:48:14 2014 Received: (at 18642) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2014 15:48:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35931 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbAWD-0006MA-Cc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:48:13 -0400 Received: from mailgw05.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.7.212]:54469) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbAWA-0006M1-Jz for 18642@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:48:11 -0400 Received: from imp02 (mailgw6.kcn.ne.jp [61.86.15.232]) by mailgw05.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A5067AA5 for <18642@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 00:48:08 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail09.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.6.188]) by imp02 with bizsmtp id zro81o00G43QJrh01ro82s; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:48:08 +0900 X-OrgRCPT: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org Received: from [10.120.1.60] (i118-21-128-66.s30.a048.ap.plala.or.jp [118.21.128.66]) by mail09.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7C1591BD009D; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 00:48:08 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:48:07 +0900 From: Norihiro Tanaka To: Jim Meyering Subject: Re: bug#18642: preparing for a new release In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <20141007004806.9AB1.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.65.07 [ja] X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18642 Cc: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Jim Meyering wrote: > Norihiro's latest fix is for a bug that is significant enough > that I would feel remiss not to make a release soon. > > Here is one patch that looks worth including: > #17715 dfa: build struct dfamust on demand > > Any other suggestions for changes to be included? > Thanks. I sent a patch to fix a potential bug. Could you review it? http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18645 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 06 15:30:51 2014 Received: (at 18642) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2014 19:30:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36018 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbDze-0003dY-Jo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:30:50 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:34296) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbDzc-0003dO-Ri for 18642@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:30:49 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id d1so5712977wiv.2 for <18642@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:30:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=/zZHlXYQ8j+RTs9PC0qmKEz69sgIOIJpAA8FoqOiKAw=; b=n4H1JXlf4V/39qeSQwlZdWznV7j4wVfxL5yPMm9ylDiWk4xp9BYYQF/JeHTJnlqeqj LDeFvWQvhV8VQO8epitM9pcSL/QarPGS8CKATNsEQ/GZRqOBZ1IAKppV4w7coKbhdfba VGNnjhlHYcC837Mti2C0spD2iSaEV8J9E4na+1AVgJmo4Gfclg2WEOZcKko4fV6xt8bZ 3+5DsNtuIqdaINx4e4cQ7VHSZjOp2RaffYrkx2HDN83YrHFvmaQU47my8VeOd0mmJffV pDmbYsVLfnBWm9Q8djxPM8Ot75ZZXPd7dxXA/2FKQ/yszb+Rh2/gCvorNHCkmOiqpMEV DbgQ== X-Received: by 10.180.91.19 with SMTP id ca19mr22113187wib.19.1412623848076; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:30:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.86.131 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 12:30:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20141007004806.9AB1.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> References: <20141007004806.9AB1.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> From: Jim Meyering Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 12:30:28 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: N65nvpMUMpK7saMQ_hgPOzEGulY Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#18642: preparing for a new release To: Norihiro Tanaka Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18642 Cc: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> Norihiro's latest fix is for a bug that is significant enough >> that I would feel remiss not to make a release soon. >> >> Here is one patch that looks worth including: >> #17715 dfa: build struct dfamust on demand >> >> Any other suggestions for changes to be included? >> > > Thanks. I sent a patch to fix a potential bug. Could you review it? > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18645 As you know, for any bug fix, we try hard to provide the following: - test case - NEWS entry describing the problem and identifying affected releases - a commit log attributing the precise commit that introduced the bug Can you provide at least a test case? BTW, I still have not attributed the commit between 2.19 and 2.20 for the most recently described (in NEWS) bug fix. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 07 10:37:41 2014 Received: (at 18642-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2014 14:37:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36738 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbVtU-0003Ia-Pf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:37:41 -0400 Received: from mailgw06.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.7.213]:57360) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbVtS-0003IQ-0w for 18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:37:39 -0400 Received: from imp02 (mailgw6.kcn.ne.jp [61.86.15.232]) by mailgw06.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE23E80021 for <18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 23:37:35 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail07.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.6.186]) by imp02 with bizsmtp id 0Edb1p00840oyB901Edbj2; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:37:35 +0900 X-OrgRCPT: 18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: from [10.120.1.38] (i118-21-128-66.s30.a048.ap.plala.or.jp [118.21.128.66]) by mail07.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2DC86D5009A; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 23:37:35 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:37:33 +0900 From: Norihiro Tanaka To: Jim Meyering Subject: Re: bug#18642: preparing for a new release In-Reply-To: References: <20141007004806.9AB1.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> Message-Id: <20141007233733.7DCF.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.65.07 [ja] X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18642-done Cc: 18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Jim Meyering wrote: > As you know, for any bug fix, we try hard to provide the following: > > - test case > - NEWS entry describing the problem and identifying affected releases > - a commit log attributing the precise commit that introduced the bug > > Can you provide at least a test case? > > BTW, I still have not attributed the commit between 2.19 and 2.20 > for the most recently described (in NEWS) bug fix. Sorry, I investigated many cases, but I couldn't find it. When this bug is reproduced, must be s == 0 and s1 > 0 and d->newlines[s] != d->newlines[s1]. In addition, they mustn't be updated until reaches a next newline. I believe that all of them is never filled at the same time. So I think once I close the bug without fix. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 08 18:42:02 2014 Received: (at 18642) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2014 22:42:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38309 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xbzvl-0005ur-8e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:42:01 -0400 Received: from mailgw05.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.7.212]:60486) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xbzvi-0005ug-4O for 18642@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:41:58 -0400 Received: from imp02 (mailgw6.kcn.ne.jp [61.86.15.232]) by mailgw05.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC05468088 for <18642@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 07:41:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail07.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.6.186]) by imp02 with bizsmtp id 0mhw1p00q40oyB901mhwuD; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 07:41:56 +0900 X-OrgRCPT: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org Received: from [10.120.1.55] (i118-21-128-66.s30.a048.ap.plala.or.jp [118.21.128.66]) by mail07.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 96585D5009A; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 07:41:56 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 07:41:56 +0900 From: Norihiro Tanaka To: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#18642: preparing for a new release In-Reply-To: <20141007233733.7DCF.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> References: <20141007233733.7DCF.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> Message-Id: <20141009074155.819D.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.65.07 [ja] X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18642 Cc: Jim Meyering X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > Sorry, I investigated many cases, but I couldn't find it. > > When this bug is reproduced, must be s == 0 and s1 > 0 and > d->newlines[s] != d->newlines[s1]. In addition, they mustn't be > updated until reaches a next newline. > > I believe that all of them is never filled at the same time. So I think > once I close the bug without fix. Sorry, I have closed bug#18642 instead of bug#18645 by my mistake. This bug isn't done. Can you re-open it? From unknown Tue Aug 19 23:11:23 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: Did not alter fixed versions and reopened. Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 02:56:02 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # Did not alter fixed versions and reopened. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 08 23:37:24 2014 Received: (at 18642) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2014 03:37:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38396 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc4Xb-0006TO-Qc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:37:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:62022) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc4XZ-0006TC-RW for 18642@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:37:22 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id k14so313466wgh.31 for <18642@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 20:37:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=kkN1vvKgDF2yY61IZgx6IXWRzC5rsTQ4T7VkBiRoEqI=; b=oEtBfzJOtpdaeuocENGsz91wv1WEk+pG8u8O6u/Jakdnc9OVVCvdU6zxRUBmwnRAYD bwKzLfZRxoEJmrEggAjej5f/qiUBgSEp6TWnQG/67hefFw8/XmHUUuc2EIKyjxYTkckL PF3OyplxAVX+KxqWwtyN7kmM+U560Aix+yg3ES8xfn1H7qq9EXWylOXTATv3AhxKYLXw 95mc/erD7QtHnrGToJokFRsBYLlMxWw9L4gtscYK7hALnTKijXjRlnx15FfujOPeciZw zsGixMYLQoRLaBo/NWE4FD6Df/0+sdkt18tR3tUnJmQiKDvyf+3lQbfiVQHspQv+5d9l EDng== X-Received: by 10.194.8.232 with SMTP id u8mr15615947wja.64.1412825840988; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 20:37:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.86.131 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:37:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20141009074155.819D.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> References: <20141007233733.7DCF.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> <20141009074155.819D.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> From: Jim Meyering Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:37:00 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YJnLH8wYT-vp8xTZSGEGY1Qhlt0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#18642: preparing for a new release To: Norihiro Tanaka Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18642 Cc: 18642 <18642@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > Norihiro Tanaka wrote: >> Sorry, I investigated many cases, but I couldn't find it. >> >> When this bug is reproduced, must be s == 0 and s1 > 0 and >> d->newlines[s] != d->newlines[s1]. In addition, they mustn't be >> updated until reaches a next newline. >> >> I believe that all of them is never filled at the same time. So I think >> once I close the bug without fix. > > Sorry, I have closed bug#18642 instead of bug#18645 by my mistake. This > bug isn't done. Can you re-open it? 18642 was auto-filed for my message saying I want to make a release soon. That is not an issue that deserves to have an open bug number, so it is fine that you closed it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 09 00:31:02 2014 Received: (at 18642-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2014 04:31:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38409 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc5NV-0007tg-Q2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:31:02 -0400 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:41352) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc5NT-0007tP-0l for 18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:30:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7408A60005; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:30:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7PyXJptyWGSf; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-71-177-17-123.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.177.17.123]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16FB639E8014; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54360F78.70504@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:30:48 -0700 From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Meyering , Norihiro Tanaka Subject: Re: bug#18642: preparing for a new release References: <20141007233733.7DCF.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> <20141009074155.819D.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18642-done Cc: 18642 <18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Jim Meyering wrote: > it > is fine that you closed it. Hah! And I reopened it at his request. Closing it again. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 09 09:41:38 2014 Received: (at 18642-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2014 13:41:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38694 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XcDyL-0007MI-Nb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:41:38 -0400 Received: from mailgw04.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.7.211]:55963) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XcDyH-0007M7-Qr for 18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:41:35 -0400 Received: from imp02 (mailgw6.kcn.ne.jp [61.86.15.232]) by mailgw04.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DBE6C1BFB for <18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:41:31 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail01.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.6.180]) by imp02 with bizsmtp id 11hX1p0063t2w9Z011hXmJ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 22:41:31 +0900 X-OrgRCPT: 18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: from [10.120.1.71] (i118-21-128-66.s30.a048.ap.plala.or.jp [118.21.128.66]) by mail01.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2F8D85A82D3; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:41:31 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 22:41:31 +0900 From: Norihiro Tanaka To: Paul Eggert Subject: Re: bug#18642: preparing for a new release In-Reply-To: <54360F78.70504@cs.ucla.edu> References: <54360F78.70504@cs.ucla.edu> Message-Id: <20141009224130.C12C.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.65.07 [ja] X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18642-done Cc: Jim Meyering , 18642 <18642-done@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Paul Eggert wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: > > it > > is fine that you closed it. > > Hah! And I reopened it at his request. Closing it again. Thanks. I'a sorry to confuse you. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 22 19:45:01 2014 Received: (at 18642) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2014 23:45:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60304 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xh5aO-0006q5-NS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:45:01 -0400 Received: from mailgw06.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.7.213]:58561) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xh5aL-0006pq-76 for 18642@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:44:58 -0400 Received: from imp01 (mailgw5.kcn.ne.jp [61.86.15.231]) by mailgw06.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E80C8007 for <18642@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:44:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail07.kcn.ne.jp ([61.86.6.186]) by imp01 with bizsmtp id 6Pkq1p00D40oyB901PkqCS; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:44:50 +0900 X-OrgRCPT: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org Received: from [10.120.1.60] (i118-21-128-66.s30.a048.ap.plala.or.jp [118.21.128.66]) by mail07.kcn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B2ADCD5009B; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:44:50 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:44:48 +0900 From: Norihiro Tanaka To: Jim Meyering Subject: Re: bug#18642: preparing for a new release In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <20141023084448.A43E.27F6AC2D@kcn.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.65.07 [ja] X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18642 Cc: 18642@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Jim Meyering wrote: > Norihiro's latest fix is for a bug that is significant enough > that I would feel remiss not to make a release soon. > > Here is one patch that looks worth including: > #17715 dfa: build struct dfamust on demand > > Any other suggestions for changes to be included? Although I submitted some patches after received this message, reak bugs are bug#18631 and bug#18685, and bug#18631 doesn't affair for users. So, I think that only bug#18685 should be fixed until a next release. From unknown Tue Aug 19 23:11:23 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator