GNU bug report logs - #18637
24.4.50; doc of frame parameter DISPLAY vs actual value on MS Windows

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 19:25:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.4.50

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 18637 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#18637: 24.4.50; doc of frame parameter DISPLAY vs actual value on MS Windows
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 22:29:51 +0300
> Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 10:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Cc: 18637 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > > Which function tells you what monitor is showing a given frame (on
> > > MS Windows)?
> > 
> > frame-monitor-attributes, if I understand what you want.
> 
> I see that that function returns some information about (attributes
> of) the monitor that is most associated with the argument frame.  And
> I see that one of the attributes is `name'.   Presumably, monitors
> would be distinguished by this parameter.

If you need to distinguish them, which should be very rarely.

> However, it is an optional parameter, so I can't imagine that one can
> count on it to distinguish monitors.  (Just why is it optional?)

I guess it's optional because not all windowing systems support it.
It is always present on MS-Windows, AFAIK.

> If one cannot count on `name', how is the identity of monitors
> determined?  Do you just go by the particular cons of attributes
> that is returned by `frame-monitor-attributes'?

Depends on what you need this for.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 7 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.