Subject: bug#18619: 24.3.93; vc-svn-ignore is broken

From: Dmitry Gutov <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 07:55:19 +0400

On 10/03/2014 06:46 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:

> But could you explain why you think the vc.el change is safe (I can agree
> it makes sense, but I want to be extra sure the change is safe).

Actually, I'm not sure that it's safe. Looking at `vc-default-ignore', 
it seems we're expected to obtain the relative path in the backend 
implementation functions.

This works, too, and limits the changes to `vc-svn.el'.