GNU bug report logs - #18611
24.3; macre step edit and use of registers

Previous Next

Full log

Message #14 received at 18611 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: charles <at> aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli)
Cc: tim.nielens <at> gmail.com, 18611 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#18611: 24.3; macre step edit and use of registers
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:08:22 +0200

charles <at> aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) writes:

>> Something similar still affects emacs-26.  Thanks for the report.
>> 
>> To reproduce from emacs -q:
>> C-x b RET
>> C-x h
>> C-x r s i
>> M->
>> F3
>> C-x r i i
>> F4
>> C-x C-k SPC
>> y
>> Error in post-command-hook (kmacro-step-edit-post-command):
>> (void-variable kmacro-step-edit-active)
>> C-x C-k SPC
>> (observe that the last "i" in "C-x r i i" is gone)
>> 
>> Actually, the following is enough to trigger the error from emacs -q:
>> C-x b RET
>> C-x C-k SPC
>> (i.e., when the last kbd macro doesn't exist)
>
> As of the fix for Bug#28818, the (void-variable
> kmacro-step-edit-active) errors should be gone, but the buggy register
> behavior remains.

(I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately got little
response at the time.)

As noted, the void-variable error is gone, but I'm not sure what the
buggy register behaviour here is?  I tried the recipe, and it seemed to
work fine?  That is `C-x C-k SPC y' executed the register insertion
command fine, as far as I can tell.

So are you still seeing this issue, or did I just misunderstand what the
problem here is?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.