From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 25 05:17:01 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2014 09:17:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51616 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XX5Aa-0007bQ-Hh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 05:17:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46934) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XX5AX-0007bH-9c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 05:16:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XX5AN-0004wC-LX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 05:16:56 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:53945) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XX5AN-0004v0-IV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 05:16:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48604) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XX5A9-0005KD-E8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 05:16:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XX59w-0004qF-6Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 05:16:33 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22e]:39045) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XX59v-0004pO-Vr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 05:16:20 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id w62so7144654wes.33 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 02:16:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=ngfZZQfPGZg3VElJny+M1T1jUWgmLefUZ3pAluEMfmg=; b=Tu02nj7XQaZPMS75tvYJJokACTXTLk+in2+xLBNeKN8vD83WQpN7fIIIWATWpHIcIO CS5RKxYIm6uM019klz/0ZN/5Lkhdf4RnMhuYSFfpWfLhTtteR4ncU9aAURKvQ+zlNDk4 Zcrb8leTMyPft7qAsZPSRphvBXztwm/sRKqPgagkoO5Om//9VG+Yfh4s7CsRQD1wyctA 77mv1zK/7mC0KMR1SNihM+rsUl+iEylepOZ2LtOMJn3dwZFk5oIEc9jhaAP2c7qEI8Ar MdG393ayAnB9/X60TrcF9NDwovdMUVUYWR/BRrzc1aUoCE3X8QH3Hvd2WTfbQMGXmIIQ LgEg== X-Received: by 10.180.39.234 with SMTP id s10mr17338434wik.23.1411636573884; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 02:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ix (dial-189139.pool.broadband44.net. [212.46.189.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c7sm8546601wib.12.2014.09.25.02.16.12 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 02:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from helmut by ix with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XX59n-0001B6-6m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:16:11 +0200 From: Helmut Eller To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.4.50; Debugger slow with long strings Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:16:11 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Moving the cursor in the debugger window is very slow in the following example: shell> cat test.el (progn (defun foo (n string) (cond ((= n 0) (debug)) (t (foo (1- n) string)))) (foo 30 (make-string 500000 ?\\))) shell> emacs -Q -nw -l test.el Now move the cursor around to see the slowness. Maybe the debugger should truncate long strings as it does with long lists. In GNU Emacs 24.4.50.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.10) of 2014-09-08 on ix From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 19 03:41:06 2016 Received: (at 18558) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2016 08:41:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33463 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWgcb-0008PJ-Rr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 03:41:06 -0500 Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:34987) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWgca-0008PB-Sp for 18558@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 03:41:05 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3509A9D2005; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:41:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QHn87LSfuhTi; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:41:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (unknown [109.232.24.28]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E92109D2004; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:41:01 +0100 (CET) From: Marcin Borkowski To: Helmut Eller Subject: Re: bug#18558: 24.4.50; Debugger slow with long strings References: Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:41:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Helmut Eller's message of "Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:16:11 +0200") Message-ID: <87h9h5jdnm.fsf@mbork.pl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18558 Cc: 18558@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On 2014-09-25, at 12:16, Helmut Eller wrote: > Moving the cursor in the debugger window is very slow in the following > example: > > shell> cat test.el > (progn > (defun foo (n string) > (cond ((= n 0) (debug)) > (t (foo (1- n) string)))) > (foo 30 (make-string 500000 ?\\))) > > shell> emacs -Q -nw -l test.el > > Now move the cursor around to see the slowness. > > Maybe the debugger should truncate long strings as it does with long > lists. Confirmed on GNU Emacs 25.1.50.2 (commit 4ccd268). I would guess that the problem is not in long string /per se/, but with lon lines in the *Backtrace* buffer, i.e. probably something connected with the display engine. I guess this bug should either be closed or merged with some other one (one of the other ones, perhaps) dealing with efficiency problems with long lines. Best, -- mbork From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 19 04:04:13 2016 Received: (at 18558) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2016 09:04:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33486 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWgyz-0000Wa-Le for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 04:04:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54171) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWgyy-0000WO-QG for 18558@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 04:04:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWgyo-0000ik-I8 for 18558@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 04:04:07 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWgyo-0000ig-FA; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 04:04:02 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2772 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aWgya-0005NL-IP; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 04:04:01 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:03:41 +0200 Message-Id: <83povtrs0i.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Marcin Borkowski In-reply-to: <87h9h5jdnm.fsf@mbork.pl> (message from Marcin Borkowski on Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:41:01 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#18558: 24.4.50; Debugger slow with long strings References: <87h9h5jdnm.fsf@mbork.pl> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18558 Cc: 18558@debbugs.gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > From: Marcin Borkowski > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:41:01 +0100 > Cc: 18558@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 2014-09-25, at 12:16, Helmut Eller wrote: > > > Moving the cursor in the debugger window is very slow in the following > > example: > > > > shell> cat test.el > > (progn > > (defun foo (n string) > > (cond ((= n 0) (debug)) > > (t (foo (1- n) string)))) > > (foo 30 (make-string 500000 ?\\))) > > > > shell> emacs -Q -nw -l test.el > > > > Now move the cursor around to see the slowness. > > > > Maybe the debugger should truncate long strings as it does with long > > lists. > > Confirmed on GNU Emacs 25.1.50.2 (commit 4ccd268). > > I would guess that the problem is not in long string /per se/, but with > lon lines in the *Backtrace* buffer, i.e. probably something connected > with the display engine. I guess this bug should either be closed or > merged with some other one (one of the other ones, perhaps) dealing with > efficiency problems with long lines. Yes, please merge it. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 19 04:15:52 2016 Received: (at 18558) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2016 09:15:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33492 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWhAG-0000n5-OR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 04:15:52 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:38072) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWhAF-0000mu-Sa for 18558@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 04:15:52 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id a4so61545895wme.1 for <18558@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:15:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=CaxQ7jxTb40lw7f3DjYwl1OgmR+qXsxQVBtln4F+QOg=; b=N7GbeyeKb9QsRQHG2+HiUSbu0MdriI8mUdwurHbl/o9ZAZp5+MPjlhIdaYzTs0QLZ4 Pzz5jYd6J2fhNr6JcO5uM2wnrYNnKZZSNjuCEOYLrtABPokXDmeZR9WbmDRuUH1erPhc vMMZiyyb9IYMyDWSo2rKeWHRANCPM56+6Qhr52A7ZhyaJgSZtIQ+Qvc3JTlMTxufFU8O M6TmN2xf6TfQfoYNzhGs+gBySA5Hnex2uVt1LC92U61FSpxrBwDGtdya7hFoqXTAh4uy knKyCIJgzm8Q3hqmFYS96mUvjr9DBhJKH9hkRvje/QSL1X00qH4zpetDIX5UDXpHWHMl WA8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=CaxQ7jxTb40lw7f3DjYwl1OgmR+qXsxQVBtln4F+QOg=; b=ixJv3L+zHWpVUYofXLdutxSN50K0/LsnreWrlaXlrZVFHRzKlGETq/tc7JsqfBm91L L0oQST9XY86wt8a2CR8b5f1qtaN8SVizBkGzCr3PRWmW8B9HaUnV0iMu9WWV1jxX427L AaFXMB2MHIWBi9RZ9nG0GRte8eSeMF9iFJhnuMb4RjeVD4JbajuGIiaRlCx7o/kQQsmH aDLxAeak9DkPL8lh6zcEVcRFipmx/8TRjLJrOMIDQwF6ayrwkDxoFRos4IrQzbq6NiMI kUieDi3Rwm+G7HKlWUb2nVU90nDuzOfOhIOr5d8fXIwqYJmWT3GPxxyFubRXJ/+w1BBG h44w== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQFolx9N1/hKCqZdTfDTOsSQETO4kgDHMmu239V3yjDflKjiQKWouvnxH3f+8ksqA== X-Received: by 10.194.95.40 with SMTP id dh8mr13603584wjb.146.1455873346230; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:15:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from ix ([212.46.171.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u132sm5606619wmd.1.2016.02.19.01.15.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:15:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from helmut by ix with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWhA8-0000yA-N6; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:15:44 +0100 From: Helmut Eller To: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: bug#18558: 24.4.50; Debugger slow with long strings References: <87h9h5jdnm.fsf@mbork.pl> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:15:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h9h5jdnm.fsf@mbork.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:41:01 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18558 Cc: 18558@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Fri, Feb 19 2016, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > I would guess that the problem is not in long string /per se/, but with > lon lines in the *Backtrace* buffer, i.e. probably something connected > with the display engine. I guess this bug should either be closed or > merged with some other one (one of the other ones, perhaps) dealing with > efficiency problems with long lines. It seems very unlikely that the general "long-lines" problem of the display engine will be fixed. In contrast, the debugger could be changed to not generate long lines, e.g. by truncating long string like it does for long/cyclic lists. Helmut From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 28 20:48:26 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2017 01:48:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35380 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJrUA-0003Hv-B6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:48:26 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180]:35501) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJrU8-0003He-Mr; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:48:24 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f180.google.com with SMTP id q15so2062898ioh.2; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:48:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=gs7dXGFucfXWwYo3AIJlV2e1vHeuQrzgvzQACdhpq80=; b=Do6w32krKIniqaDNUmTf5/UFEyw+glkwWuaT69J2oSnN5FR0trNYjwSQ8ouxN/plo8 /hozgp+Hh7DULo1Dw8ZJ7b39BFA7WZG9dpShBcLJm5YL6Bj4jfeVhPqO9rJspi/hdAF9 Vrnyzh4khiuksG/2jE24Iu1U96zp9a2YUkYOUYGvYvbBi9dJpzBw0uEHJnAIFjclGIoo 50RcPvQfeSyvrLNkbMggtXv5B3RyCPII64jKSM3+vzC99syYZwNytvcJ4AfIVeth7IE4 YlVt31sV8mBZ5XDRhd1wuFpeunHgKe3Rv1jkPoWHFINdRd2FXD1s19g+tk+YmtSt6awI 7h9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=gs7dXGFucfXWwYo3AIJlV2e1vHeuQrzgvzQACdhpq80=; b=ploXh43JBloGs3iuGR5GGKIZBvz1xbGEyOuNBRRJ6A9lqJPzvpAY+t1GbWC0Kvw+x9 4XtV2qofd+cEhfuT1Kap9Tt1RVee90WIXDSwZTkWZi+ypTNfb9ikf89hWZN5nEUUZSV8 npAlm0+kfIPVQD22CYGNBfOv3WYImFzg/NpXs41gvv0TlbncRTWIwqI3mu7md0GQsRNm grCHzCpioF08OU1tgWyH5sc7MkaO0/+4cvpDE7xGueCmItwYzs/Bo9dNDmn9anirZjUV nUfyjcnKsr6fyXw/wNomKOwRT2AHrQV07g4NDOv7kZyd5Ydq321CdqC9n1tlSwZXxSyV 4Jiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX53VzfWpdtQxKWWgR8ZaacNgDgP6+gkEEbkQLCeI2NIy18MB/3e fk5Rq3hd+SfxaNIe9wAXxj17oQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbWVBQrdOAIQ6eDEENAHAVDadzCMlwwdSI7aF51ifj/zhID675c0yPGHIrqY85bkNeB2C6tLg== X-Received: by 10.107.101.11 with SMTP id z11mr1647876iob.66.1511920098877; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:48:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebian ([45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e68sm12660058ite.0.2017.11.28.17.48.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:48:18 -0800 (PST) From: Noam Postavsky To: Kaushal Modi Subject: Re: bug#29463: Backtraces with large strings is very slow References: Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:48:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Kaushal Modi's message of "Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:33:07 +0000") Message-ID: <877eu9n9cv.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: 29463@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) merge 29463 18558 quit Kaushal Modi writes: >> I was trying to debug some code that dealt with very large SVG > images, > and getting a backtrace buffer proved impossible -- Emacs would just > hang. > > +1. Though I see that slow-down on backtrace on emacs-26 branch too.. > especially when edebugging/debugging through code in an Org exporter. It's been reported as far back as 24.4. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 21 04:20:55 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2019 08:20:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59050 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iBadT-0007cp-2t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 04:20:55 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:48934) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iBadR-0007ch-Er for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 04:20:53 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iBadO-000839-R0 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 10:20:52 +0200 Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 10:20:50 +0200 Message-Id: <87ef0a12n1.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #29463 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 29463 fixed close 29463 27.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 29463 fixed close 29463 27.1 quit From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:38:56 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 11:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator