Subject: [Patch] Mention the return value of `clone-indirect-buffer'

From: Tom Willemse <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:49:18 +0200

Hey,

I hope it's ok that I'm replying to this bug.

I've attached a suggestion for mentioning the return value for
`clone-indirect-buffer'. Please let me know what you think.

# Bazaar merge directive format 2 (Bazaar 0.90)
# revision_id: [email-masked]
# target_branch: bzr://bzr.sv.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/
# testament_sha1: 14f39b93edb4937309c738111fb8220fc3776acd
# timestamp: 2014-09-18 00:10:58 +0200
# base_revision_id: [email-masked]
# 
# Begin patch
=== modified file 'lisp/ChangeLog'
--- lisp/ChangeLog	2014-09-17 09:17:27 +0000
+++ lisp/ChangeLog	2014-09-17 22:05:12 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2014-09-17  Tom Willemse  <[email-masked]>
+
+	* simple.el (clone-indirect-buffer): Mention the return value.
+
 2014-09-17  Reuben Thomas  <[email-masked]>
 
 	* progmodes/js.el: Add interpreter-mode-alist support for various

=== modified file 'lisp/simple.el'
--- lisp/simple.el	2014-08-28 01:59:29 +0000
+++ lisp/simple.el	2014-09-17 22:05:12 +0000
@@ -7577,7 +7577,9 @@
 This is always done when called interactively.
 
 Optional third arg NORECORD non-nil means do not put this buffer at the
-front of the list of recently selected ones."
+front of the list of recently selected ones.
+
+This function returns the newly created indirect buffer."
   (interactive
    (progn
      (if (get major-mode 'no-clone-indirect)

# Begin bundle