GNU bug report logs - #18440
libexec_LIBRARIES not allowed

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: Dan Nicolaescu <dann <at> gnu.org>

Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 01:25:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 <at> freenet.de>
To: bug-automake <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#18440: libexec_LIBRARIES not allowed
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:49:09 +0200
On 09/10/2014 03:24 AM, Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
>
> Trying to add a target with
> libexec_LIBRARIES
> results in an error:
>
>   error: 'libexecdir' is not a legitimate directory for 'LIBRARIES'
>
> But it looks like having libraries in libexec is something already in
> use by a few things.
> On a Fedora 20 machine:
> $ find /libexec -name \*.so
> /usr/libexec/p7zip/7z.so
> /usr/libexec/coreutils/libstdbuf.so
> /usr/libexec/sudo/sudo_noexec.so
> /usr/libexec/sudo/sudoers.so
> /usr/libexec/sudo/group_file.so
> /usr/libexec/sudo/system_group.so
> /usr/libexec/systemtap/libHelperSDT_amd64.so
> /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.3/liblto_plugin.so
> /usr/libexec/deja-dup/tools/libduplicity.so
>
> Shouldn't automake support installing libraries in libexec?
No. libexecdir is supposed to take binaries only.

IMO, these listed above are packaging bugs.

Ralf






This bug report was last modified 10 years and 210 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.