GNU bug report logs - #18378
wrong fontification of Java code

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Cc: Jordon Biondo <jordonbiondo <at> gmail.com>, 18378 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#18378: [Patch] wrong fontification of Java code
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 20:06:38 +0000

Hello again, Stefan.

Ping?

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).


On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 18:09:47 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hello, Stefan.

> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 15:13:05 +0100, Stefan Kangas wrote:
> > Hi Alan,

> > Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de> writes:

> > > I missed this bug report back in 2014.  The code has moved around so
> > > much since then that Jordon's patch no longer applies.  But a simple
> > > patch with the same idea appears to fix this bug:

> > Thanks for taking a look.

> > With your fix, applied on the master branch, in the example given:

> >     class X
> >     {
> >         public void x ()
> >         {
> >             for (int this_is_not_a_function_name : getX ()) {
> >             }
> >         }
> >     }

> > The "int" no longer has font-lock-type-face.  Should it?

> That's funny.  It has font-lock-type-face for me, in all of emacs-27,
> master and standalone CC Mode (in master).  font-lock-type-face is indeed
> correct, here.

> Are you sure you were ....  (I don't think I need to fill in the dots for
> you.  ;-)

> > Best regards,
> > Stefan Kangas

> -- 
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.