GNU bug report logs -
#18357
24.3.93; Calendar not fully displayed
Previous Next
Reported by: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 18:25:02 UTC
Severity: minor
Found in version 24.3.93
Done: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #28 received at 18357 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:48:55 +0200
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
>
>
> > I don't think so. For example here on Windows XP, emacs -Q with current
> > trunk, evaluating
> >
> > (progn
> > (custom-set-faces
> > '(mode-line ((t (:background "#000040" :foreground "wheat" :box (:line-width 2 :color "#000040") :weight bold :family "Verdana"))))
> > '(mode-line-inactive ((t (:inherit mode-line :background "grey48" :foreground "wheat" :box (:line-width 2 :color "#000040"))))))
> > (setq calendar-week-start-day 1)
> > (calendar))
> >
> > gives screenshot calendar-1.png while evaluating
> >
> > (progn
> > (custom-set-faces
> > '(mode-line ((t (:background "#000040" :foreground "wheat" :box (:line-width 2 :color "#000040") :weight bold :family "Verdana"))))
> > '(mode-line-inactive ((t (:inherit mode-line :background "grey48" :foreground "wheat" :box (:line-width 2 :color "#000040"))))))
> > (setq calendar-week-start-day 1)
> > (sit-for 0)
> > (calendar))
> >
> > gives the expected screenshot calendar-2.png.
>
> Sorry. The screenshots were from an earlier experiment. The current ones
> should fit the description above.
I see no differences between the 2 progn forms you evaluated, so I
cannot really judge whether they correspond to what Stephen reported.
This bug report was last modified 10 years and 352 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.