GNU bug report logs -
#18336
24.4.50; When editing externally changed file, Emacs asks too many questions
Previous Next
Reported by: David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:19:01 UTC
Severity: minor
Tags: fixed, patch
Found in version 24.4.50
Fixed in version 28.1
Done: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #83 received at 18336 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, stefan <at> marxist.se, 18336 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 12:54:41 -0500
>
> > Thanks. Any suggestions for how to fix this? A new argument to
> > lock_file, perhaps? Or maybe some additional check in
> > userlock--ask-user-about-supersession-threat to recognize the special
> > situation where we are saving a file?
>
> I'm not sure. Why exactly are we calling lock_file from write_region?
Because write-region can be called from an unmodified buffer, I
suppose, and from a buffer whose buffer-file-name is not the same as
the file being written to.
> Do not (normally) call this for a buffer already modified,
> as either the file is already locked, or the user has already
> decided to go ahead without locking.
>
> It seems we are doing exactly this, so I guess that makes
> save-buffer/write-region an "abnormal" situation?
Evidently, when we disabled backups in /tmp, we missed the fact that
lock_file called from write-region will be affected. When backups are
not disabled, this works correctly.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 120 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.