From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 20 17:31:56 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2014 21:31:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48484 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XKDU4-0001hH-3D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:31:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43116) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XKDJe-0001OT-RU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:21:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKDJT-0004GG-TP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:21:05 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:34747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKDJT-0004GC-QG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:20:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44794) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKDJO-0008Mh-33 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:20:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKDJI-0004Dc-EB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:20:54 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKDJI-0004DY-Ar for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:20:48 -0400 Received: from cpc64773-cmbg15-2-0-cust83.5-4.cable.virginm.net ([86.9.84.84]:53692 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKDJH-0005gx-Sa for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:20:48 -0400 From: Brandon Invergo To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: lack of central info dir file Organization: GNU Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 22:20:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87tx5626z8.fsf@naga.invergo.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:31:54 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've just successfully installed the Guix system on a spare computer (yay!). I'll send some bug reports as they roll in. First up... $HOME/.guix-profile/share/info/dir always points to the dir file of the most recently installed package. Instead, normally a dir file exists independently of any package, and each package's entry is installed in it via install-info. So, now, for example, in info I only see Emacs' entries but not Recutils, Coreutils or any of the other packages I've installed. Is it possible to remove or block the symlinking of each package's dir in favor of installing to a user-local dir file in the profile? Or would this interfere with the no-side-effects nature of Guix? =2Dbrandon =2D-=20 Brandon Invergo http://brandon.invergo.net --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT9REuAAoJEARu3ubrerdNyqgIAI6+p7YW/8LMyHAf1o0+nIDY PKRazHRQPTHVxWvp+NjnK3skeUvnJNruDVTJkEeBeOxPQ3l+lC9ZrwHq+FJpLuVr 2I4LFDbZ8wnkSk245qWqf0UFFK/52Ukz8fel6H8Bjj+WcSrqtBU5Yz3jb0wyNt8S P7TPEPDvhFS1T7KKuDJi4Xf3b47pJ4wvCRxBN4uM0409yCiBIvHQmBBpwswv/7go B4nI3+HtU9TnhZFyDhhCOvU9yhnEx53wxLttqeqnTDNpQYr+EMQCN696/nwuek6J keRQaXy39SAcNlIW1oNHSh4wWu0+nS8iw+kZ52RsWKk0cCvLS60W2VeI3HmTmlA= =RDUv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 22 05:00:39 2014 Received: (at 18305) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2014 09:00:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49299 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XKki5-0001L2-JZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 05:00:38 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:44407) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XKki2-0001Kr-A2 for 18305@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 05:00:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069113800; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:00:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ceMM9ftaAfm3; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:00:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pluto (ADijon-554-1-148-114.w92-148.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.148.156.114]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F3AFFBA; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:00:31 +0200 (CEST) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Brandon Invergo Subject: Re: bug#18305: lack of central info dir file References: <87tx5626z8.fsf@naga.invergo.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 5 Fructidor an 222 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:00:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tx5626z8.fsf@naga.invergo.net> (Brandon Invergo's message of "Wed, 20 Aug 2014 22:20:43 +0100") Message-ID: <8761hk6gr4.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130011 (Ma Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18305 Cc: 18305@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hi, Brandon! Brandon Invergo skribis: > I've just successfully installed the Guix system on a spare computer > (yay!). I'll send some bug reports as they roll in. First up... Cool. :-) > $HOME/.guix-profile/share/info/dir always points to the dir file of the > most recently installed package. Instead, normally a dir file exists > independently of any package, and each package's entry is installed in > it via install-info. So, now, for example, in info I only see Emacs' > entries but not Recutils, Coreutils or any of the other packages I've > installed. Yes, that=E2=80=99s a known issue. This has to be addressed in =E2=80=98profile-derivation=E2=80=99, which cur= rently just computes the union of all the installed packages. It should run =E2=80=98install-info=E2=80=99 in addition to that to build the new =E2=80= =98dir=E2=80=99. I=E2=80=99ll see if I can get around to fixing it, if nobody beats me at it. > Is it possible to remove or block the symlinking of each package's dir > in favor of installing to a user-local dir file in the profile? Or > would this interfere with the no-side-effects nature of Guix? Hopefully the above answers your question? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 23 16:38:55 2014 Received: (at 18305-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2014 20:38:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50450 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XLI5O-0000KJ-7p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 16:38:54 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:45693) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XLI5K-0000K8-4C for 18305-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 16:38:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90819386D; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:38:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o43AguKDzhS2; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:38:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pluto (reverse-83.fdn.fr [80.67.176.83]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34B7F3808; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:38:48 +0200 (CEST) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Brandon Invergo Subject: Re: bug#18305: lack of central info dir file In-Reply-To: <8761hk6gr4.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:00:31 +0200") Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 19:22:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87y4ufxgsf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tx5626z8.fsf@naga.invergo.net> <8761hk6gr4.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130011 (Ma Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 6 Fructidor an 222 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This is now fixed. Feedback welcome! Specifically, ‘profile-derivation’ has support to build the profile’s ‘dir’ file by running ‘install-info’. For the record, I initially wanted to come up with a more generic design for things that need to be done at profile build time. I haven’t come up with such a design, but Info was going to be the main consumer anyway, so I’m happy with the simpler approach. [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18305-done Cc: 18305-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This is now fixed. Feedback welcome! Specifically, ‘profile-derivation’ has support to build the profile’s ‘dir’ file by running ‘install-info’. For the record, I initially wanted to come up with a more generic design for things that need to be done at profile build time. I haven’t come up with such a design, but Info was going to be the main consumer anyway, so I’m happy with the simpler approach. [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date This is now fixed. Feedback welcome! Specifically, =E2=80=98profile-derivation=E2=80=99 has support to build the= profile=E2=80=99s =E2=80=98dir=E2=80=99 file by running =E2=80=98install-info=E2=80=99. For the record, I initially wanted to come up with a more generic design for things that need to be done at profile build time. I haven=E2=80=99t c= ome up with such a design, but Info was going to be the main consumer anyway, so I=E2=80=99m happy with the simpler approach. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Aug 16 22:48:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator