GNU bug report logs -
#18285
24.3.92; A combination of `display' on text and `invisible' and `before/after-string' leads to the before/after string being displayed twice
Previous Next
Reported by: Dmitry <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 22:36:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 24.3.92
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #35 received at 18285 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 15:41:51 +0400
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
> CC: 18285 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> >> Anyway, how about the other way around? I'll like this less, but why not
> >> make `invisible' inactive when `display' is set?
> >
> > That's what Emacs does already. The only place where invisible still
> > matters in this situation is when deciding how and where to display
> > overlay strings. I thought I explained that earlier in this thread.
>
> So, why not make it matter less? "If display is set, don't interpret
> invisible" should be a straightforward piece of logic.
If that's what people want, it's an easy change. But the question is,
won't that cause overlay strings not to be displayed in some cases?
> If `display' takes priority over `invisible', I would expect
>
> (let ((pt (point)))
> (insert (propertize "a" 'display "bbb"))
> (let ((o (make-overlay pt (point))))
> (overlay-put o 'after-string "foo\nbar")))
>
> and
>
> (let ((pt (point)))
> (insert (propertize "a" 'display "bbb"))
> (let ((o (make-overlay pt (point))))
> (overlay-put o 'invisible t)
> (overlay-put o 'after-string "foo\nbar")))
>
> to be rendered the same.
The question is what would you expect from the second example, if it
used before-string there? Should the before-string be displayed or
shouldn't it? Since invisible makes the beginning of the overlay
disappear, under your suggestion it won't be displayed.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 37 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.