GNU bug report logs - #18266
grep -P and invalid exits with error

Previous Next

Full log

Message #52 received at 18266 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent <at> vinc17.net>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: 18266 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Santiago <santiago <at> debian.org>,
 758105 <at> bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: grep -P and invalid exits with error
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:18:22 +0200

On 2014-08-29 06:43:45 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Thanks, but that patch seems to depend on libpcre internals, in that it
> "knows" that pcre_exec cannot possibly succeed without first checking its
> entire input buffer for invalid UTF-8 bytes.  Even if that's true now, it
> reflects a performance bug that might be fixed in a future libpcre version.

If I understand correctly, I don't think that's an internal.
The pcreapi(3) man page says about PCRE_NO_UTF8_CHECK:

      [...] Note that this option can also be passed to pcre_exec()
      and pcre_dfa_exec(), to suppress the validity checking of
      subject strings only. If the same string is being matched
      many times, the option can be safely set for the second and
      subsequent matchings to improve performance.

The last sentence would imply that the UTF8 checking is done on the
whole input buffer before matching is done.

> Also, I don't see why grep needs to copy the buffer when there's an encoding
> error.  Why not simply rerun the matcher on the initial prefix that doesn't
> have an encoding-error byte, and then (if that doesn't find a match), try
> matching the suffix after the encoding-error byte?  This approach would not
> only avoid the buffer copy, it would avoid knowledge of libpcre internals.

If there are many invalid UTF8 bytes, this would be slow, IMHO (it
could be worth a try, though).

But is the copy of the buffer really needed? Couldn't the invalid
UTF8 sequences just be replaced by null bytes?

Note that in case of invalid UTF8 bytes, in some (many?) cases, the
cause is a binary file (possibly with some text in it), where lines
can be very long. So, wouldn't it mean that it can take significantly
more memory?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent <at> vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.