Subject: Re: bug#18253: 24.4.50; doc string of `remq': correct it per the doc of `remove'

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:12:58 +0900

Hi,

> Thanks for the report. Fixed in trunk r117732.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Drew Adams <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Please explicitly say that `remq' returns a *copy* of LIST, just as we
> > do in the doc string of `remove'.  It does *not* "Return LIST with all
> > occurrences of ELT removed."

IMHO, describing remq to return a copy of list is also confusing.  Since
it does not return a copy on some cases.

enami.