From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 08 03:48:38 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Aug 2014 07:48:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34591 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XFeuk-0003X3-03 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 03:48:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55688) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XFeug-0003Wp-LU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 03:48:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFeuR-0006Yy-Ke for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 03:48:29 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:52597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFeuR-0006Yu-Hz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 03:48:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57283) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFeuK-0006gy-2F for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 03:48:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFeuC-0006Ss-E4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 03:48:12 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:53822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFeuC-0006Sc-4m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 03:48:04 -0400 Received: from debian (aqu33-1-82-66-2-95.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.2.95]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreue006) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LzUX8-1WKzrv3oLi-014oiY; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 09:48:02 +0200 Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 09:47:57 +0200 From: Andreas Enge To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Source of mit-scheme Message-ID: <20140808074757.GA13320@debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:R8aDweDOOcIiNHZUNXNfja+Ok8YqG7ZePYSQ7MXyyc5 mK1Pz9gavcAFiXw+jlAeJtbtLji1HffAWCr7H53OySDbjb/51n m3P0/lisWupQlFhMo8mR3zeiPcM5CopQUtcUN8GuGo6N08CA4v 2zR8/nE/nczh96NmNEp9g9JWcutxvZMzeGaYZAdwizm7S3Y+Gd dvDDAbCXcSe4Aw4Tqn1hafwESkwAe0EmzE+5JDuiuh/JARwWzn tAKsQM439TimXuOGZO4Jf0MTY56pXDlGpg0HZfuFkWmOe8VK91 QeXTlu2VMBkJZ/GRuDAoekw5+jAz4fUnPJ9CQZ+f3B07tebtQ= = X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hello, mit-scheme fails to build on mips64el-linux, because specific source is not downloaded for this system. Furthermore, I wonder if in the corresponding lines (match (%current-system) ("x86_64-linux" "x86-64") ("i686-linux" "i386") (_ "c")) one need not also check for the target system in the usual manner. Here the "c" should be the empty string, I think, and the preceding "-" should be included into "x86-64" and "i386". As the source field is set to #f, the command guix build mit-scheme -S fails with a confusing error message. Is all this worth it, or should we not revert to a generic build recipe? Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 13 15:23:30 2014 Received: (at 18221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Aug 2014 19:23:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42243 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XHe8v-0006Z8-Po for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:23:30 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:44296 ident=hope2) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XHe8t-0006Z0-Th for 18221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:23:28 -0400 Received: from c-24-62-95-23.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.62.95.23] helo=yeeloong.lan) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XHe8n-0004sy-GV; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:23:21 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: bug#18221: Source of mit-scheme References: <20140808074757.GA13320@debian> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:22:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140808074757.GA13320@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Fri, 8 Aug 2014 09:47:57 +0200") Message-ID: <87wqacry8b.fsf@yeeloong.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18221 Cc: 18221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Andreas Enge writes: > Hello, > > mit-scheme fails to build on mips64el-linux, because specific source is not > downloaded for this system. Furthermore, I wonder if in the corresponding > lines > (match (%current-system) > ("x86_64-linux" "x86-64") > ("i686-linux" "i386") > (_ "c")) > one need not also check for the target system in the usual manner. > Here the "c" should be the empty string, I think, and the preceding "-" > should be included into "x86-64" and "i386". I'm not sure I understand what you're suggesting. The problem here is that the "c" belongs in a different place in the filename than where the "i386" or "x86-64" goes. The filenames are: mit-scheme-9.2-i386.tar.gz mit-scheme-9.2-x86-64.tar.gz mit-scheme-c-9.2.tar.gz So I guess we need something like this (untested): (uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/mit-scheme/stable.pkg/" version "/mit-scheme-" (match (%current-system) ("x86_64-linux" (string-append version "-x86-64")) ("i686-linux" (string-append version "-i386")) (_ (string-append "c-" version))) ".tar.gz")) Thanks, Mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 13 17:05:02 2014 Received: (at 18221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Aug 2014 21:05:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42405 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XHfjB-0000uq-71 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:05:01 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:51945) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XHfj8-0000uW-Hy for 18221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:04:59 -0400 Received: from debian (aqu33-1-82-66-2-95.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.2.95]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreue007) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Ln0mX-1WlMEX3wib-00hLtc; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 23:04:25 +0200 Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 23:04:22 +0200 From: Andreas Enge To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#18221: Source of mit-scheme Message-ID: <20140813210422.GA1856@debian> References: <20140808074757.GA13320@debian> <87wqacry8b.fsf@yeeloong.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wqacry8b.fsf@yeeloong.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:MWVfX/tJuT8w2YGHrJkZ9rlmAdBjL/wNcnUAyIYqbWS +GL8C2xRjvIXMXMB3OJWiMAgmyHHo5xA/OFM35iOZaoh66aLF0 mo2l7Yux2MfW0JRCYPycvTxhUkktVnEYdzt5zzGUg0xJ56Cuag cnFKLEEoYThUsLrc822NsNQ1dNNBBDTdYwcK8X6EvG4epw8ktN 0fPaQsc/DqMQdcD9OXer4i0nvr0hDsWc6MwQQCunAPU6/Y4Nkb ehBFGCmozRaII31tPUjPkW4hWBOmDGL64LNJVwOoazH+DXtWvW f3fZk5ySmhwzqui6rlEPrYSe0YGfAmoWlRJ5rQAh9C5s1jF1A= = X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18221 Cc: 18221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:22:28PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > The problem here is that the "c" belongs in a different place in the > filename than where the "i386" or "x86-64" goes. The filenames are: > mit-scheme-9.2-i386.tar.gz > mit-scheme-9.2-x86-64.tar.gz > mit-scheme-c-9.2.tar.gz There is also mit-scheme-9.2.tar.gz; I thought this would need to be taken on other systems. But maybe this is the non-boot-strappable source code? Second, do we not need to replace %current-system by (or (%current-target-system)(%current-system)) ? Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 13 21:50:58 2014 Received: (at 18221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Aug 2014 01:50:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42589 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XHkBu-0001CL-2Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 21:50:58 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:44654 ident=hope8) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XHkBq-0001C8-HO for 18221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 21:50:55 -0400 Received: from [24.62.95.23] (helo=jojen) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XHkBg-0005mD-2w; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 21:50:44 -0400 From: mhw@netris.org To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: bug#18221: Source of mit-scheme References: <20140808074757.GA13320@debian> <87wqacry8b.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <20140813210422.GA1856@debian> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 21:50:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140813210422.GA1856@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Wed, 13 Aug 2014 23:04:22 +0200") Message-ID: <87a977n8jz.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18221 Cc: 18221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Andreas Enge writes: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:22:28PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> The problem here is that the "c" belongs in a different place in the >> filename than where the "i386" or "x86-64" goes. The filenames are: >> mit-scheme-9.2-i386.tar.gz >> mit-scheme-9.2-x86-64.tar.gz >> mit-scheme-c-9.2.tar.gz > > There is also mit-scheme-9.2.tar.gz; I thought this would need to be taken > on other systems. But maybe this is the non-boot-strappable source code? Yes, I believe mit-scheme-9.2.tar.gz can only be built if you already have an executable copy of mit-scheme with which to build it. > Second, do we not need to replace > %current-system > by > (or (%current-target-system)(%current-system)) Hmm, this would be needed to support cross-compilation for typical packages, but I suspect that the process is quite a bit different for mit-scheme. I'd be very surprised if it was that simple. For now, I suggest that we focus on getting mit-scheme working on mips with native compilation. Later, if someone is motivated, they can look into what's needed to cross-compile mit-scheme. Thanks! Mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 18 12:48:33 2014 Received: (at 18221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Aug 2014 16:48:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46398 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XJQ6i-0007nV-C5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:48:33 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:40346) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XJQ6a-0007nE-Ep for 18221@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:48:28 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084F137FE; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:48:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vsaiZYRPx-qo; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:48:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pluto (ADijon-554-1-104-225.w90-26.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.26.84.225]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4BAB1365; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:48:21 +0200 (CEST) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#18221: Source of mit-scheme In-Reply-To: <87wqacry8b.fsf@yeeloong.lan> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:22:28 -0400") Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:06:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87mwb3i2ao.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20140808074757.GA13320@debian> <87wqacry8b.fsf@yeeloong.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130011 (Ma Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 30 Thermidor an 222 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Mark H Weaver skribis: > The problem here is that the "c" belongs in a different place in the > filename than where the "i386" or "x86-64" goes. The filenames are: > > mit-scheme-9.2-i386.tar.gz > mit-scheme-9.2-x86-64.tar.gz > mit-scheme-c-9.2.tar.gz > > So I guess we need something like this (untested): > > (uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/mit-scheme/stable.pkg/" > version "/mit-scheme-" > (match (%current-system) > ("x86_64-linux" > (string-append version "-x86-64")) > ("i686-linux" > (string-append version "-i386")) > (_ > (string-append "c-" version))) > ".tar.gz")) [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.5 DATE_IN_PAST_24_48 Date: is 24 to 48 hours before Received: date X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18221 Cc: Andreas Enge , 18221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Mark H Weaver skribis: > The problem here is that the "c" belongs in a different place in the > filename than where the "i386" or "x86-64" goes. The filenames are: > > mit-scheme-9.2-i386.tar.gz > mit-scheme-9.2-x86-64.tar.gz > mit-scheme-c-9.2.tar.gz > > So I guess we need something like this (untested): > > (uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/mit-scheme/stable.pkg/" > version "/mit-scheme-" > (match (%current-system) > ("x86_64-linux" > (string-append version "-x86-64")) > ("i686-linux" > (string-append version "-i386")) > (_ > (string-append "c-" version))) > ".tar.gz")) [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.5 DATE_IN_PAST_24_48 Date: is 24 to 48 hours before Received: date Mark H Weaver skribis: > The problem here is that the "c" belongs in a different place in the > filename than where the "i386" or "x86-64" goes. The filenames are: > > mit-scheme-9.2-i386.tar.gz > mit-scheme-9.2-x86-64.tar.gz > mit-scheme-c-9.2.tar.gz > > So I guess we need something like this (untested): > > (uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/mit-scheme/stable.pkg/" > version "/mit-scheme-" > (match (%current-system) > ("x86_64-linux" > (string-append version "-x86-64")) > ("i686-linux" > (string-append version "-i386")) > (_ > (string-append "c-" version))) > ".tar.gz")) Yes, I think that=E2=80=99s what=E2=80=99s needed, so OK to commit. (And yes, I agree it=E2=80=99s fine to ignore cross-compilation for now.) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 27 14:10:17 2014 Received: (at 18221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2014 18:10:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53886 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XXwRk-0006MP-Sa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 14:10:17 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:49602) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XXwRh-0006MF-1J for 18221@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 14:10:14 -0400 Received: from debian (aqu33-1-82-66-2-95.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.2.95]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreue105) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MEFDM-1XVgJN1f6e-00FT57; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:09:45 +0200 Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:09:43 +0200 From: Andreas Enge To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Subject: Re: bug#18221: Source of mit-scheme Message-ID: <20140927180943.GA30945@debian> References: <20140808074757.GA13320@debian> <87wqacry8b.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <87mwb3i2ao.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87mwb3i2ao.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:kcK9TuY6uo7T0/nhsjieuH6NWv02PRMOMZwQHnLtZbk DHREY2kHkFFu2b1IrFHcu5/+11ashqhq3jtDmA8H3LImlfGuVU E5KI9l10DSvG88GeZP8414E0G7KWRdfETQ1ATZQgaVeQvw8l6h XxEbWqNTXG6/Ej4Ngj37F0UkJvmh5ApVta8HJzBim4Z/eYkfNL 57etI6uyAWCghxwJZ683r0QIOKRQWKqmvGgQSIXu6XsqWR/k3f QVaSowtB4YcNgMIDFuvu+f3F58CgfNlqKDlDUwDOUadOOXfHBQ ZzTApCHBcoPH/Ep6FS9n0PBN9UaK/zLsAD4C0+OFM+r16oMIg= = X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18221 Cc: Mark H Weaver , 18221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 05:06:07PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Yes, I think that’s what’s needed, so OK to commit. Done with commit 68dddca. However, on mips64el we are now in the case that the binaries are not precompiled, so one would need to bootstrap. Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 27 14:51:40 2014 Received: (at 18221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2014 18:51:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53900 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XXx5n-0007Pz-Dm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 14:51:39 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:59605) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XXx5j-0007Pp-AA for 18221@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 14:51:36 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA702267; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:51:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UuXfuLApTAUi; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:51:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pluto (aqu33-1-82-66-2-95.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.2.95]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCCD31998; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:51:31 +0200 (CEST) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: bug#18221: Source of mit-scheme References: <20140808074757.GA13320@debian> <87wqacry8b.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <87mwb3i2ao.fsf@gnu.org> <20140927180943.GA30945@debian> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 6 =?utf-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miaire?= an 223 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:51:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20140927180943.GA30945@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:09:43 +0200") Message-ID: <87oau0gami.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130011 (Ma Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18221 Cc: Mark H Weaver , 18221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Andreas Enge skribis: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 05:06:07PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Yes, I think that=E2=80=99s what=E2=80=99s needed, so OK to commit. > > Done with commit 68dddca. Cool. :-) > However, on mips64el we are now in the case that the binaries are not > precompiled, so one would need to bootstrap. Could be that we=E2=80=99re not doing it right, I don=E2=80=99t know. I did try to build from the C source a while back, FWIW: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=3Ddetailitem&item_id=3D29236 Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 27 14:52:39 2014 Received: (at request) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2014 18:52:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53904 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XXx6l-0007Rf-9c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 14:52:39 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:59608) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XXx6i-0007RW-N3 for request@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 14:52:37 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CF92267 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:52:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G5j-s-WOL9F4 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:52:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pluto (aqu33-1-82-66-2-95.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.2.95]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFD0A1998 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:52:35 +0200 (CEST) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: request@debbugs.gnu.org X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 6 =?utf-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miaire?= an 223 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:52:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87k34ogakt.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130011 (Ma Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: retitle 18221 MIT/GNU Scheme fails to build on non-Intel platforms thanks [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: request X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: retitle 18221 MIT/GNU Scheme fails to build on non-Intel platforms thanks [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject retitle 18221 MIT/GNU Scheme fails to build on non-Intel platforms thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 27 15:45:14 2014 Received: (at 18221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2014 19:45:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53942 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XXxvd-0001bT-9l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 15:45:13 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:58893) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XXxvb-0001bK-4O for 18221@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 15:45:12 -0400 Received: from c-98-217-13-77.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.217.13.77] helo=yeeloong.lan) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XXxvU-0002lo-7z; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 15:45:04 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: bug#18221: Source of mit-scheme References: <20140808074757.GA13320@debian> <87wqacry8b.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <87mwb3i2ao.fsf@gnu.org> <20140927180943.GA30945@debian> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 15:42:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140927180943.GA30945@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:09:43 +0200") Message-ID: <87zjdkc0jl.fsf@yeeloong.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18221 Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 18221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Andreas Enge writes: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 05:06:07PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Yes, I think that=E2=80=99s what=E2=80=99s needed, so OK to commit. > > Done with commit 68dddca. That commit adds a top-level procedure 'source-directory' that is specific to mit-scheme. If it's kept at the top-level, it should probably be renamed to something like 'mit-scheme-source-directory'. Also, it would be good to line up the two calls to 'string-prefix?'. Thanks! Mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 27 17:05:55 2014 Received: (at 18221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2014 21:05:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53973 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XXzBi-0003cG-Jp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 17:05:55 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:59918) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XXzBf-0003c6-Nn for 18221@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 17:05:52 -0400 Received: from debian (aqu33-1-82-66-2-95.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.2.95]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreue004) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LpiwE-1YA55t1K1G-00fVUb; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 23:05:43 +0200 Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 23:05:41 +0200 From: Andreas Enge To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#18221: Source of mit-scheme Message-ID: <20140927210541.GA5857@debian> References: <20140808074757.GA13320@debian> <87wqacry8b.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <87mwb3i2ao.fsf@gnu.org> <20140927180943.GA30945@debian> <87zjdkc0jl.fsf@yeeloong.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zjdkc0jl.fsf@yeeloong.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:piP2ZST3kmu2OP3Y964HUML6sKTN5uO/ngk2we/lNLv j608MEeoSEAYQnWp12944bV/dafLPPANarMiX1F3xjF2s+TAMj bz0JUXdtUMxiorx5pPhiaqKAcUgWhzDrYP7pe/KQvN9iJk5aR0 oZfIfPNly4jlo+PfiarjTxxmx5JE2b7Qd9lncKY1vdaMDUmiY5 2V6PD2xAHNHE7AAjeuNvLjig3PPMDzYpg8hP4+XVvkMhMpS371 A6sWZnMc9hi/OLxQqMoWOwFhQtVMzdR/Kh3Naj6n85QMHjP53p JVvONNnSM0vcTAytbeOESxI/XxqGXN1V4j/fhYmAwjiqhXIaw= = X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18221 Cc: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= , 18221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 03:42:54PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > That commit adds a top-level procedure 'source-directory' that is > specific to mit-scheme. If it's kept at the top-level, it should > probably be renamed to something like 'mit-scheme-source-directory'. > > Also, it would be good to line up the two calls to 'string-prefix?'. Sorry! Are you interested in looking more into how to make it compile on mips? In that case you might do the changes at the same time. Otherwise, I will make a separate commit to clean this up. Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 27 18:03:11 2014 Received: (at 18221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2014 22:03:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53987 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XY059-0004y5-AN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 18:03:11 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:59794) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XY056-0004xu-AM for 18221@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 18:03:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13E2228B; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 00:03:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TGvUskuUJ69M; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 00:03:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pluto (aqu33-1-82-66-2-95.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.2.95]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 678E519CD; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 00:03:06 +0200 (CEST) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#18221: Source of mit-scheme References: <20140808074757.GA13320@debian> <87wqacry8b.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <87mwb3i2ao.fsf@gnu.org> <20140927180943.GA30945@debian> <87zjdkc0jl.fsf@yeeloong.lan> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 7 =?utf-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miaire?= an 223 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 00:03:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87zjdkc0jl.fsf@yeeloong.lan> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Sat, 27 Sep 2014 15:42:54 -0400") Message-ID: <87a95ken6s.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130011 (Ma Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18221 Cc: Andreas Enge , 18221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Mark H Weaver skribis: > That commit adds a top-level procedure 'source-directory' that is > specific to mit-scheme. If it's kept at the top-level, it should > probably be renamed to something like 'mit-scheme-source-directory'. > > Also, it would be good to line up the two calls to 'string-prefix?'. Done. :-) Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 19 17:50:54 2019 Received: (at 18221-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2019 22:50:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56870 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwEE1-0003TY-PU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:50:54 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:54544) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwEDz-0003TQ-UI for 18221-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:50:52 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418282C5F; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:50:51 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mn7PaZs9tjTh; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:50:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:910:103f:0:2d09:8018:be35:9702]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A5F82C4F; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:50:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:50:48 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: 18221-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Close Message-ID: <20190219225048.GA2828@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18221-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) The bug stricto sensu has been fixed by a "supported systems" clause. Since in more than 4 years nobody seems to have missed the package on other architectures, I am closing the bug for now. Andreas From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:22:12 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator