Subject: Re: bug#18200: (no subject)

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 19:34:41 +0100

Sorry for the late response; the bug report has been sitting in a part
of the bug tracker that nobody has looked at due to a misunderstanding.

Carlos Pita <[email-masked]> writes:

> 1) The imap server, M-g, /N "think" the email is read.
> 2) The summary buffer (before /N or M-g) "thinks" there is no email.
>
> Then you can just say that the summary buffer isn't immediately
> refreshed, which doesn't feel so bad and is easier to understand and
> live with.
>
> The fix (mod unexpected side effects) is:

The patch was missing from the mail...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no