GNU bug report logs - #18133
Suppressing asynchronous command output

Previous Next

Full log

Message #149 received at 18133 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>, 18133 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Subject: Re: bug#18133: Suppressing asynchronous command output
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:45:43 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 31 December 2016 at 08:41, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
> > Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 00:19:21 +0000
> > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>,
> 18133 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > Thanks, Juri; can you converge with Eli, and then I'll have a coherent
> proposal I can program?
>
> I'm okay with Juri's approach as well.
>

​Here is a patch that attempts to implement Juri's approach.​

​However, at the moment it doesn't work. I think the problem is to do with
combining process filters. As suggested in the Emacs manual, I use
add-function to combine the new process filter with the default
comint-output-filter. But no matter what I try, the original filter does
not seem to be run any more, even if I pass a trivial function to
add-function. I've studied the documentation, and I can't see what I'm
doing wrong.

-- 
https://rrt.sc3d.org <http://rrt.sc3d.org>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[0001-Allow-async-command-output-buffer-to-be-shown-only-o.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.