From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 25 11:29:16 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2014 15:29:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37947 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XAhQl-00029U-Aq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:29:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54075) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XAhQe-00028v-CB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:29:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAhQY-0005qs-CY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:28:59 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAhQY-0005qn-8l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:28:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55773) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAhQX-0005ke-BH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:28:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAhQP-0005jd-Qj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:28:57 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d]:42102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAhQP-0005jN-JP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:28:49 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ty20so3191031lab.18 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:28:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=l/iObMFvV9Y1UeGS67yC3z4wahKThauPpl9LRx9wq1Y=; b=z2Wiof+RO/HmXNXm3CHbSgDLPrJFR7EJJ4wxcrGwPfOgmc0oUzs1VJk33LwD7tp1CB l883x3o8r/OrLtJqb0cB5jVaf7kw1b4C6Afz6vp62IOWts7nZdosq7oHaq+nw927oP1w a6F90q0dFpjXzT3OL9RtpGxQzOMf3g1gY+O2pTKWM2RCcA3P5swsQ6sMYmp0IdvW9Ogq xLOuBiLa/dCx5ZE1FkTwmdZPpNoPA6x5F/UYkP2O8BGcNDwOKSne7jxLHme2xtbxS7Ab eoGDyiWR+qzhNzWAz5hqQRfjUnM7ZhsainZQzLEfaJKnfM9yReBtTTLYCXIoimy5iG8h kUMQ== X-Received: by 10.152.228.164 with SMTP id sj4mr16995935lac.7.1406302128520; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:28:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.137.38 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:28:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Carlos Pita Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:28:28 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: term, ansi-term: clarify documentation To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) AFAICS nowadays there is no real difference between `term` and `ansi-term` regarding the ANSI part. Could you clarify this fact in the doc strings? The names are very misleading regarding the (just cosmetic) differences between these interactive functions. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 30 22:41:29 2018 Received: (at 18106) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2018 03:41:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50138 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1egjH7-0003lB-A6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 22:41:29 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]:37814) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1egjH4-0003kq-8y; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 22:41:26 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f44.google.com with SMTP id h129so3322003ita.2; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:41:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=+ENpJxvGA6PLLHUXz/JqK1pcH7wG1nvaUke0ZvuZiGc=; b=o1nSfgzRNihp5+zEx4bWrPT2eBVxS6WwebliLxqx91GedmIBiUMdXPBR3ChYqy1QJB D8Fala8DRXBOwRwMgqKVWOvDIyoS5Z1fe/vx5oAvTTE8Q1PJQYsGjpYfZsRIXxv8vT9R iOn5zD3SH6vDdVJkZJkDX1tLu9Fa6YWeGPW4d+S5MRCN8f//WXL0hlmVrsbeO5PLjyEU xpkdafpeg2kd/H00/sWRFxnpmHd+G1qyFR0e7M09+8aUiO9KRQaPJa/SR1yULT5hMaAk lrvGpLtSORLBkTcIWJXkyPzK2VSyTgaksTgKZJ0sT9CJxl/JrpB5t7DH7IrHCo0dvxBN l1Cw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=+ENpJxvGA6PLLHUXz/JqK1pcH7wG1nvaUke0ZvuZiGc=; b=sPe9t07zsZ+ST6NAjemZzwbpdW5lFFGwULqzDdH8jgwxwPJGezqsJSIm9U3GXe1s8C ssEodrhc1LRegT7eDfT7z3r6Ox55QDe7BPv5+6hIwZCJi1zrOxl/UJJwEjp8X7D08VKz MNDUL9cDKGZcHwDpWsFB1dbjFBmwI7l0eBeBWqo1vWu2sXWYjf9Yg0uE+V/jSc2CIBwH ygGSagq2lYk7O7antfqF+nu8SkCKcL4i1IiGSiEhe6XiosQoIhrqMVfHsxvm2CYUy1Oc Q+YlWBFfxdNEI6a5DDtrtthQixSkcJFELQPBDKXsjIC6zolYnyu9Wim6qoGx0TMdYLwo pUww== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdahga0z2FRWgOz3pME9l7CKWFOj57nVoAKA0bC9BXmf/jlhjqY FfAbREdfPhVbAH1+zmsTzF3v8w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2267w4gXHStrx3v87NvuyO0/XS0OSRZpWLAqeoc18jkj+mfw1ayEqFYQn1vk054FNHxXOTyv0w== X-Received: by 10.36.64.136 with SMTP id n130mr36169294ita.105.1517370080726; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebian ([45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l63sm6924253ita.44.2018.01.30.19.41.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:41:19 -0800 (PST) From: Noam Postavsky To: Carlos Pita Subject: Re: bug#18106: term, ansi-term: clarify documentation References: Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 22:41:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Carlos Pita's message of "Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:28:28 -0300") Message-ID: <87vafihezl.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 18106 Cc: 18106@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) tags 18106 fixed close 18106 26.1 quit Carlos Pita writes: > AFAICS nowadays there is no real difference between `term` and > `ansi-term` regarding the ANSI part. Could you clarify this fact in > the doc strings? The names are very misleading regarding the (just > cosmetic) differences between these interactive functions. Done in emacs-26. [1: 732d1b9383]: 2018-01-30 22:14:03 -0500 Clarify that `ansi-term' is almost the same as `term' (Bug#18106) https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=732d1b9383a9381896df12a2762991c3ed68b025 From unknown Sun Sep 07 12:44:40 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator