GNU bug report logs -
#1806
dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place
Previous Next
Reported by: Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:40:04 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
>> Actually Dired already displays that list in the Dired window itself
>> when the list is too large and fills the whole window. But it would be
>> bad to replace the Dired buffer with a small list with 2-3 filename lines
>> and a lot of empty lines. So it is better to display a separate window
>> near the minibuffer without empty lines using `fit-window-to-buffer'.
>
> Reasonable. I suppose we should try to stay in the same "column" when
> frames are divided horizontally. Any fallback we should use when a
> bottom window can't be split? Split the selected one?
Creating a full-width window would fit more information, and the
window width will be the same as the width of the minibuffer's window.
This will more logically connect a new window to the minibuffer
that is necessary for dired files and completions:
+------------+------------+
| | |
| | |
| dired | other |
| | |
| | |
+------------+ |
| other | |
| | |
+------------+------------+
| file1.ext file2.ext |
| file3.ext file4.ext |
+-------------------------+
| Prompt: command |
+-------------------------+
I think this would be the best layout, but not sure is it possible
to create it using splitting from the initial configuration?
+------------+------------+
| | |
| | |
| dired | other |
| | |
| | |
+------------+ |
| other | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
+------------+------------+
| Prompt: command |
+-------------------------+
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 236 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.