Subject: Re: bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place

From: "Roland Winkler" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:59:48 +0200

On Mon May 18 2009 martin rudalics wrote:
>  > Could you also fix Proced and Calendar?
> 
> I attached a similar patch for `proced-send-signal'.  I don't know what
> to do about `proced' itself.  Roland what do you think?

What do you mean by "proced itself"? Only proced-send-signal should
behave analogous to dired-pop-to-buffer.

Roland