GNU bug report logs - #18051
24.3.92; ls-lisp: Sorting; make ls-lisp-string-lessp a normal function?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de

Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:24:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 24.3.92

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #32 received at 18051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 18051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#18051: 24.3.92; ls-lisp: Sorting;
 make ls-lisp-string-lessp a normal function?
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:18:19 +0200
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

> From my POV, making sure the package always behaves as designed, I
> guess.  You agreed with my motivation, so it sounds like a
> contradiction to me to still push for the change.

Seems I again misunderstood what you meant with:

> [...]  So I will generally oppose to introducing any option into it
> that cannot be had with an external 'ls' program, as long as the
> latter is the main method of getting a

I had read that as introducing "user options", but you obviously meant
introducing options for changing the behavior using any means.

> Anyway, if others think the comparison of file names should be up for
> grabs, I won't fight the change just because I think it's wrong.

At least we agree that there's room for improvement.

Anyway, what I want to reach:

  (1) sort in files starting with a dot as if they had no dot
  (2) -v sorting (sorting versions correctly)

isn't that both possible with ls?  (2) obviously; I think (1) depends on
the system's language setting?




This bug report was last modified 10 years and 224 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.