Subject: Re: bug#18051: 24.3.92; ls-lisp: Sorting; make ls-lisp-string-lessp a normal function?

From: Michael Heerdegen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:15:38 +0200

Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:

> That is already available (e.g., sorting by size is triggered by the
> "-S" switch).

But very inconveniently: C-u s [edit minibuffer] RET.

It would be more convenient when s without prefix would cycle between
more then two sorting orders, and when this would be configurable.