From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 03 11:35:55 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2014 15:35:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41826 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X2j38-00056V-It for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 11:35:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46900) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X2gPk-0007wI-QY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 08:47:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2gPX-0000Ux-Dy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 08:46:55 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:56332) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2gPX-0000Ur-AY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 08:46:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48535) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2gPP-0006UM-6A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 08:46:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2gPG-0000Rp-UU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 08:46:39 -0400 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::197]:36727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2gPG-0000RR-OA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 08:46:30 -0400 Received: from mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.138]) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4955741C083 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:46:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter9-d.gandi.net Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]) by mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hn5uuiDsIAsK for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:46:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 189.61.161.72 Received: from x201 (unknown [189.61.161.72]) (Authenticated sender: guilherme@semente.io) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7C4541C07E for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:46:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Guilherme Gondim To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.3.50; ido-delete-file-at-head deleting files with no prompt confirmation X-Face: #:Fn?LX@Nx9(ho*~ZXZFJ|?^@A@3; )w2)bG&Bs-`?2Aw[fxg){glCA!)jD-XIi[fU?4=$[5 cY86d]Eb[??Y![?JH^]\JI#~H, {CL6U8!XQ1if:< +Y$`tmWV*LI1l Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 09:46:20 -0300 Message-ID: <87oax6r4o3.fsf@semente.io> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 11:35:43 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) In `ido-find-file' typing C-k (`ido-delete-file-at-head') when `delete-by-moving-to-trash' is t, the file is "deleted" straightway by moving to trash directory. Otherwise, if it is nil, the "delete function" will ask if you really want delete the file. Should not ido ask for confirmation in case of `delete-by-moving-to-trash'? I found it quite dangerous once the user could type C-k by mistake and might not notice his file was moved to trash. Thanks, Guilherme In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2014-01-01 on gkar, modified by Debian (emacs-snapshot package, version 2:20140101-1~bpo70+1) Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11204000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 7.5 (wheezy) Configured using: `configure --build x86_64-linux-gnu --host x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --localstatedir=/var --infodir=/usr/share/info/emacs-snapshot --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-pop=yes --enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs-snapshot:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/24.3.50/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/24.3.50/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp --with-crt-dir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ --with-x=yes --with-x-toolkit=gtk3 --with-imagemagick=yes 'CFLAGS=-DDEBIAN -DSITELOAD_PURESIZE_EXTRA=5000 -g -O2' CPPFLAGS=-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 'LDFLAGS=-g -Wl,--as-needed -znocombreloc'' -- Guilherme Gondim pgp BD9325BC From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 03 16:40:15 2019 Received: (at 17911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2019 20:40:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hu0p5-0002eQ-05 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 16:40:15 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:53500) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hu0p1-0002eB-US for 17911@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 16:40:12 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hu0oy-0007s3-DB; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 22:40:10 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Guilherme Gondim Subject: Re: bug#17911: 24.3.50; ido-delete-file-at-head deleting files with no prompt confirmation References: <87oax6r4o3.fsf@semente.io> Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 22:40:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87oax6r4o3.fsf@semente.io> (Guilherme Gondim's message of "Thu, 03 Jul 2014 09:46:20 -0300") Message-ID: <877e7uc7a0.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Guilherme Gondim writes: > In `ido-find-file' typing C-k (`ido-delete-file-at-head') when > `delete-by-moving-to-trash' is t, the file is "deleted" straightway by > moving to trash directory. Otherwise, if it is nil, the "del [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17911 Cc: 17911@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Guilherme Gondim writes: > In `ido-find-file' typing C-k (`ido-delete-file-at-head') when > `delete-by-moving-to-trash' is t, the file is "deleted" straightway by > moving to trash directory. Otherwise, if it is nil, the "delete > function" will ask if you really want delete the file. > > Should not ido ask for confirmation in case of > `delete-by-moving-to-trash'? I found it quite dangerous once the user > could type C-k by mistake and might not notice his file was moved to > trash. (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately have not received any responses yet.) I think the ido design makes sense -- when there's undo available, asking the user isn't necessary. So I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 03 16:40:19 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2019 20:40:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60061 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hu0p9-0002ei-Ah for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 16:40:19 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:53514) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hu0p7-0002ea-OH for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 16:40:18 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hu0p5-0007sB-3f for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 22:40:17 +0200 Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 22:40:14 +0200 Message-Id: <875znec79t.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #17911 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 17911 notabug close 17911 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 17911 notabug close 17911 quit From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:29:04 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator