From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:04:16 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#17826 <17826@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#17826 <17826@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.4.50; compile.el: gcc-include is now all INFO, not WARNING Reply-To: bug#17826 <17826@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:04:16 +0000 retitle 17826 24.4.50; compile.el: gcc-include is now all INFO, not WARNING reassign 17826 emacs submitter 17826 Dima Kogan severity 17826 minor tag 17826 patch fixed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 21 04:48:54 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jun 2014 08:48:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55399 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WyGyj-00015q-Tk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 04:48:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38613) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WyGyf-00015c-9O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 04:48:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WyGyT-0003cc-Ar for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 04:48:43 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:59180) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WyGyT-0003cL-87 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 04:48:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39383) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WyGyN-00019J-Ci for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 04:48:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WyGyH-0003JJ-DO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 04:48:31 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:54722) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WyGyH-0003Fc-8K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 04:48:25 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A9E21996 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 04:48:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 21 Jun 2014 04:48:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secretsauce.net; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= mesmtp; bh=PL4McL5iIw711CePXDyNkrwcWlQ=; b=fEpasVOH/ilm43/AfjvMg 4pT/3SYVQk/e3tDG050I7vO1pLT+OxWgxCgR4Fcrg1rwgZ/1AI3uioc1N6SNUR/U r18WuVaEHPVJbwzIM6WXwpHaFUoLPKnNj6aQYK3Nu92EmkhZUMt1C8cvJ8Kj0i3h 6I3O0hF7M+3jx5uO/NLtg4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=PL4McL5iIw711CePXDyNkr wcWlQ=; b=hKcw6bA92xwS9ZW9Hqz6a6XV6KBxYzou9pf2J+wmD9tSGO1TdUmPFu SO/KzXFpQ4tQnzFVOPmYoSuhhUdctLbS7mr3/SNhLqF/NAHm+Vbr82s+ItCIDvbC qAHS9QdKOVhTUmZjh6MuviU/ULVHHhAeoIPJHL1WJYt+ythQWjc5Y= X-Sasl-enc: 67gVhW1aTRPyDJOhDmDyJdITU/ogbYysy1BJEZ04N6o5 1403340503 Received: from shorty.local (unknown [23.243.199.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4EE6368017F for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 04:48:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dima by shorty.local with local (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1WyGyD-0002ya-Lj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 01:48:21 -0700 From: Dima Kogan To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.4.50; compile.el: gcc-include is now all INFO, not WARNING Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 01:48:21 -0700 Message-ID: <87simy7ine.fsf@secretsauce.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain The attached patch changes the gcc-include type of "M-x compile" to be INFO. Let's say I have 3 source files: a.c: #include "a.h" a.h: #include "b.h" b.h: asdf; Clearly trying to compile a.c fails since b.h has an error. I do M-x compile, and build with "gcc -c -o a.o a.c". I get a *compilation* buffer with -*- mode: compilation; default-directory: "/tmp/" -*- Compilation started at Sat Jun 21 01:43:01 gcc -c -o a.o a.c In file included from a.h:1:0, from a.c:1: b.h:1:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class [enabled by default] aadsf; ^ Compilation finished at Sat Jun 21 01:43:01 Prior to this patch the line that contains "from a.h:1:0," was seen as INFO and the line that contains "from a.c:1:" was seen as a WARNING. This patch makes them both INFO. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-diff Content-Disposition: inline; filename=0001-gcc-include-compilation-lines-are-now-INFO-now-WARNI.patch >From 1a7756577d2c6bdeae0d9cea0098ed3b388b8036 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dima Kogan Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 01:32:59 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] gcc-include compilation lines are now INFO, now WARNING This patch changes the gcc-include type of "M-x compile" to be INFO. Let's say I have 3 source files: a.c: a.h: b.h: asdf; Clearly trying to compile a.c fails since b.h has an error. I do M-x compile, and build with "gcc -c -o a.o a.c". I get a *compilation* buffer with -*- mode: compilation; default-directory: "/tmp/" -*- Compilation started at Sat Jun 21 01:43:01 gcc -c -o a.o a.c In file included from a.h:1:0, from a.c:1: b.h:1:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class [enabled by default] aadsf; ^ Compilation finished at Sat Jun 21 01:43:01 Prior to this patch the line that contains "from a.h:1:0," was seen as INFO and the line that contains "from a.c:1:" was seen as a WARNING. This patch makes them both INFO. --- lisp/progmodes/compile.el | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/compile.el b/lisp/progmodes/compile.el index 000d719..ea2bfc4 100644 --- a/lisp/progmodes/compile.el +++ b/lisp/progmodes/compile.el @@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ of[ \t]+\"?\\([a-zA-Z]?:?[^\":\n]+\\)\"?:" 3 2 nil (1)) (gcc-include "^\\(?:In file included \\| \\|\t\\)from \ \\([0-9]*[^0-9\n]\\(?:[^\n :]\\| [^-/\n]\\|:[^ \n]\\)*?\\):\ -\\([0-9]+\\)\\(?::\\([0-9]+\\)\\)?\\(?:\\(:\\)\\|\\(,\\|$\\)\\)?" - 1 2 3 (4 . 5)) +\\([0-9]+\\)\\(?::\\([0-9]+\\)\\)?\\(?:\\([:,]\\|$\\)\\)?" + 1 2 3 (nil . 4)) (ruby-Test::Unit "^[\t ]*\\[\\([^\(].*\\):\\([1-9][0-9]*\\)\\(\\]\\)?:in " 1 2) -- 2.0.0 --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 04 09:14:40 2019 Received: (at 17826) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2019 13:14:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60804 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1huGLQ-0000K1-1y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 09:14:40 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:37358) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1huGLJ-0000Hz-Lx for 17826@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 09:14:34 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1huFhn-0007LE-7p; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 14:33:45 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Dima Kogan Subject: Re: bug#17826: 24.4.50; compile.el: gcc-include is now all INFO, not WARNING References: <87simy7ine.fsf@secretsauce.net> Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 14:33:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87simy7ine.fsf@secretsauce.net> (Dima Kogan's message of "Sat, 21 Jun 2014 01:48:21 -0700") Message-ID: <87tvax9kk9.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Dima Kogan writes: > The attached patch changes the gcc-include type of "M-x compile" to be > INFO. Let's say I have 3 source files: > > a.c: > #include "a.h" > > a.h: > #include "b.h" > > b.h: > asdf; > > Clearly tryin [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17826 Cc: 17826@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dima Kogan writes: > The attached patch changes the gcc-include type of "M-x compile" to be > INFO. Let's say I have 3 source files: > > a.c: > #include "a.h" > > a.h: > #include "b.h" > > b.h: > asdf; > > Clearly trying to compile a.c fails since b.h has an error. I do M-x > compile, and build with "gcc -c -o a.o a.c". I get a *compilation* > buffer with > > -*- mode: compilation; default-directory: "/tmp/" -*- > Compilation started at Sat Jun 21 01:43:01 > > gcc -c -o a.o a.c > In file included from a.h:1:0, > from a.c:1: > b.h:1:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class [enabled by default] > aadsf; > ^ > > Compilation finished at Sat Jun 21 01:43:01 > > Prior to this patch the line that contains "from a.h:1:0," was seen as > INFO and the line that contains "from a.c:1:" was seen as a > WARNING. This patch makes them both INFO. I think this makes a lot of sense, and I've tried the patch, and it fixes this problem. Does anybody object to making both those "included" lines INFO instead of having one of them WARNING? (The practical effect here is that `next-error' will skip INFO lines by default.) > -\\([0-9]+\\)\\(?::\\([0-9]+\\)\\)?\\(?:\\(:\\)\\|\\(,\\|$\\)\\)?" > - 1 2 3 (4 . 5)) > +\\([0-9]+\\)\\(?::\\([0-9]+\\)\\)?\\(?:\\([:,]\\|$\\)\\)?" > + 1 2 3 (nil . 4)) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 04 09:14:40 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2019 13:14:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60802 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1huGLP-0000Jy-OZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 09:14:39 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:37358) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1huGLJ-0000Hz-4u for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 09:14:33 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1huFht-0007LM-Jm for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 14:33:51 +0200 Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 14:33:49 +0200 Message-Id: <87sgqh9kk2.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #17826 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 17826 + patch quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 17826 + patch quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 13 06:22:19 2020 Received: (at 17826) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Aug 2020 10:22:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47031 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k6ANH-00079X-Jn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 06:22:19 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55816) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k6ANF-00079H-3s for 17826@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 06:22:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dYlnxmyW0ffe8y9Bd6EFCy81cV4z0WElJnXhnTO89/g=; b=f2rhOX0dEtxBw+bBkunbbjq/ld EUfG3FIyVE3E8UaaZVJZLn+nfGnfARxMWHaTwiQZEdflqkt0c4WoEF6/v/F1e2Z2e7BqwLpjAk6b5 Tvcx/eytTsE3bc+gDe9uyOD9+M2QsXcVvtTPZztR5ezoaudlcnD8CLqS0s12pT3iuCxc=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k6AN6-0004zC-1x; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:22:10 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Dima Kogan Subject: Re: bug#17826: 24.4.50; compile.el: gcc-include is now all INFO, not WARNING References: <87simy7ine.fsf@secretsauce.net> <87tvax9kk9.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:22:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tvax9kk9.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 04 Aug 2019 14:33:42 +0200") Message-ID: <87d03ug81d.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I think this makes a lot of sense, and I've tried the patch, and it > fixes this problem. Does anybody object to making both those "included" > lines INFO instead of having one of them WARNING? > > [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17826 Cc: 17826@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I think this makes a lot of sense, and I've tried the patch, and it > fixes this problem. Does anybody object to making both those "included" > lines INFO instead of having one of them WARNING? > > (The practical effect here is that `next-error' will skip INFO lines by > default.) There was no response, so I've now gone ahead and applied the patch. (I've not re-tested the test case since last year, but there doesn't seem to have been many changes in this area since then, so I'm guessing that this won't be a problem.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 13 06:22:25 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Aug 2020 10:22:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47034 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k6ANM-00079p-Qj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 06:22:25 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55830) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k6ANL-00079V-4M for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 06:22:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ffxJF/jMcTZS4NyeyVK+gQPRZSJO+NUKSQ57uVSeV7I=; b=ePWGBa+BHp5/Y9JuqfXOGL9sJx ZCk97BUqZCYm2lXNYyjyUWTVUAdYFUBx8hmWgASStQDEEIp1smX1TgmxtlzARNjrDL8tZctvQMPbS sXLmMyHI5Du45b8gU/bykQr/3UT7unACAqrzPmXcCXlUExj9VdjspmL1sQ78nXCuc/jM=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k6AND-0004zL-Du for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:22:17 +0200 Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:22:14 +0200 Message-Id: <87bljeg815.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #17826 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 17826 fixed close 17826 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 17826 fixed close 17826 28.1 quit From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:04:16 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator