GNU bug report logs - #17806
24.4.50; Branch emacs-24 fails to beuild on Debian

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta <at> golden-gryphon.com>

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 23:39:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.4.50

Done: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #46 received at 17806 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta <at> golden-gryphon.com>, Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>,
 Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov <at> yandex.ru>, 17806 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#17806: 24.4.50; Branch emacs-24 fails to beuild on Debian
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 17:06:19 -0400
>> Why does Emacs even have --enable-link-time-optimization as a configure
>> option? Does it provide any measurable benefit?
> It's supposed to have better runtime performance.  In my standard little
> benchmark, though, --enable-link-time-optimization slowed down runtime CPU

Don't know what benchmark you use, but I generally use byte-compilation
of Emacs's files as my own benchmark.  It's kind of lousy (since it
constantly changes), but it is one real-life code where a lot of Elisp
is executed.

> I installed the attached as emacs-24 bzr 117269 to try to discourage casual
> use.  Another possibility would be to
> remove --enable-link-time-optimization, but I suppose that should be done in
> the trunk if it's done at all.  I'll CC: this to Dmitry as he added the
> option in the first place.

If it tends to break (and since IIUC it's new in 24.4), we could also
remove it from 24.4.


        Stefan




This bug report was last modified 11 years and 47 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.