GNU bug report logs -
#17800
seq weirdness with -0
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:39:03 +0100
with message-id <53A19677.1080307 <at> draigBrady.com>
and subject line Re: bug#17800: seq weirdness with -0
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #17800,
regarding seq weirdness with -0
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
17800: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17800
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
$ ./seq --version | head -1
seq (GNU coreutils) 8.22.119-8a51b
./seq -0 n works fine when n is a single digit:
$ ./seq --separator=, -0 5
-0,1,2,3,4,5
But something weird happens when one uses a number >= 10:
$ ./seq --separator=, -0 10
-0,-1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-6,-7,-8,-9,.0,.1,.2,.3,.4,.5,.6,.7,.8,.9,/0,/1,/2,/3,/4,/5,/6,/7,/8,/9,00,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10
[It also happens without the --separator; I just use that to save
vertical space.] This smells of ASCII, and looking at the code, the
problem is very likely to be the seq_fast/incr functions. I don't know
what the simplest fix is, though.
Rasmus
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
On 06/18/2014 01:03 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 06/18/2014 10:41 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> $ ./seq --version | head -1
>> seq (GNU coreutils) 8.22.119-8a51b
>>
>> ./seq -0 n works fine when n is a single digit:
>>
>> $ ./seq --separator=, -0 5
>> -0,1,2,3,4,5
>>
>> But something weird happens when one uses a number >= 10:
>>
>> $ ./seq --separator=, -0 10
>> -0,-1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-6,-7,-8,-9,.0,.1,.2,.3,.4,.5,.6,.7,.8,.9,/0,/1,/2,/3,/4,/5,/6,/7,/8,/9,00,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10
>>
>> [It also happens without the --separator; I just use that to save
>> vertical space.] This smells of ASCII, and looking at the code, the
>> problem is very likely to be the seq_fast/incr functions. I don't know
>> what the simplest fix is, though.
>
> Ouch. I see the issue. Fix on the way...
Fast path avoidance logic updated in the attached.
thanks!
Pádraig.
[seq-0.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 11 years and 34 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.