GNU bug report logs - #17702
24.3; insert-char no longer inserts "bell" control character

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Ulrich Mueller <ulm <at> gentoo.org>

Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 14:15:03 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.3

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #20 received at 17702 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Ulrich Mueller <ulm <at> gentoo.org>
Cc: 17702 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#17702: 24.3;
 insert-char no longer inserts "bell" control character
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 20:38:46 +0300
> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 18:08:43 +0200
> Cc: 17702 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm <at> gentoo.org>
> 
> >>>>> On Thu, 05 Jun 2014, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > That's because U+1F541 has "BELL" as its 'name' property, whereas
> > u+0007 has "BELL" as its 'old-name' property.  Emacs completion picks
> > only one from these 2 duplicate candidates.
> 
> Is there any chance to get this fixed upstream (i.e. to have U+1F514
> renamed in Unicode)?

I wouldn't hold my breath.  They've deliberately removed names of the
control characters, as explained clearly in the Unicode Standard.  But
you are welcome to ask a question on the Unicode mailing list
unicode <at> unicode.org.

> Also, if BELL is an "old-name", what is the new name of the U+0007
> character then?

It doesn't have one.

> (describe-char says <control> which doesn't look like a proper name
> at all.)

That was fixed for Emacs v24.4.

> > Perhaps some completion guru could find a way to allow multiple
> > candidates with the same name in this case.
> 
> Does this mean that more such duplicates exist?

I don't know; I hope not.




This bug report was last modified 10 years and 355 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.