Subject: bug#17669: Fwd: Re: Solaris acl woes

From: Paul Eggert <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:44:57 -0700

[Forwarding this to Bug#17669 as bug-coreutils seems to have misfiled it 
under 17664; closing 17664.]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Solaris acl woes
Date: 	Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:56:03 -0700
From: 	Paul Eggert <[email-masked]>
Organization: 	UCLA Computer Science Department
To: 	Ben Walton <[email-masked]>, [email-masked], 
[email-masked]

Ben Walton wrote:

> The lib/file-has-acl.c:acl_ace_nontrivial code that returns 1 is:

Why is it returning 1, exactly?  What are the value of access_masks[0,
1] and how do they compare to the masks, and what bits are set that
shouldn't be if we want the ACLs to be trivial?