GNU bug report logs - #17664
Solaris acl woes

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>

Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:57:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#17664: closed (Solaris acl woes)
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 17:46:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:44:57 -0700
with message-id <538CB819.1050103 <at> cs.ucla.edu>
and subject line Fwd: Re: Solaris acl woes
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #17664,
regarding Solaris acl woes
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
17664: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17664
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
To: Ben Walton <bdwalton <at> gmail.com>, bug-gnulib <at> gnu.org, bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: Solaris acl woes
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:56:03 -0700

Ben Walton wrote:

> The lib/file-has-acl.c:acl_ace_nontrivial code that returns 1 is:

Why is it returning 1, exactly?  What are the value of access_masks[0, 
1] and how do they compare to the masks, and what bits are set that 
shouldn't be if we want the ACLs to be trivial?



[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
To: 17669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: 17664-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Fwd: Re: Solaris acl woes
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:44:57 -0700

[Forwarding this to Bug#17669 as bug-coreutils seems to have misfiled it 
under 17664; closing 17664.]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Solaris acl woes
Date: 	Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:56:03 -0700
From: 	Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Organization: 	UCLA Computer Science Department
To: 	Ben Walton <bdwalton <at> gmail.com>, bug-gnulib <at> gnu.org, 
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org



Ben Walton wrote:

> The lib/file-has-acl.c:acl_ace_nontrivial code that returns 1 is:

Why is it returning 1, exactly?  What are the value of access_masks[0,
1] and how do they compare to the masks, and what bits are set that
shouldn't be if we want the ACLs to be trivial?
This bug report was last modified 11 years and 77 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.