Subject: bug#17664: Solaris acl woes

From: Paul Eggert <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:56:03 -0700

Ben Walton wrote:

> The lib/file-has-acl.c:acl_ace_nontrivial code that returns 1 is:

Why is it returning 1, exactly?  What are the value of access_masks[0, 
1] and how do they compare to the masks, and what bits are set that 
shouldn't be if we want the ACLs to be trivial?