From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 02 09:56:56 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2014 13:56:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40819 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WrSjP-0001Th-V5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:56:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39190) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WrSjO-0001TU-6g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:56:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrSj8-0002vh-3K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:56:49 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:42610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrSj8-0002vX-0k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:56:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40751) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrSj0-0001sO-Ih for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:56:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrSis-0002oT-TM for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:56:30 -0400 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:60218) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrSis-0002k0-Ja; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:56:22 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1C4A6003C; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 06:56:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52KkHV-HMe52; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 06:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-108-0-233-62.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [108.0.233.62]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 023DFA6000D; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 06:56:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <538C8273.7020607@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:56:03 -0700 From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Walton , bug-gnulib@gnu.org, bug-coreutils@gnu.org Subject: Re: Solaris acl woes References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Ben Walton wrote: > The lib/file-has-acl.c:acl_ace_nontrivial code that returns 1 is: Why is it returning 1, exactly? What are the value of access_masks[0, 1] and how do they compare to the masks, and what bits are set that shouldn't be if we want the ACLs to be trivial? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 02 13:45:14 2014 Received: (at 17664-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2014 17:45:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41178 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WrWII-0008IC-4B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 13:45:14 -0400 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:54483) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WrWIC-0008HI-KR; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 13:45:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833CAA6003D; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:44:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oQ5m3f6p+7xF; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:44:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 788ACA60028; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:44:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <538CB819.1050103@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:44:57 -0700 From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 17669@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Fwd: Re: Solaris acl woes References: <538C8273.7020607@cs.ucla.edu> In-Reply-To: <538C8273.7020607@cs.ucla.edu> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <538C8273.7020607@cs.ucla.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17664-done Cc: 17664-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) [Forwarding this to Bug#17669 as bug-coreutils seems to have misfiled it under 17664; closing 17664.] -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Solaris acl woes Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:56:03 -0700 From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department To: Ben Walton , bug-gnulib@gnu.org, bug-coreutils@gnu.org Ben Walton wrote: > The lib/file-has-acl.c:acl_ace_nontrivial code that returns 1 is: Why is it returning 1, exactly? What are the value of access_masks[0, 1] and how do they compare to the masks, and what bits are set that shouldn't be if we want the ACLs to be trivial? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 03 02:51:32 2014 Received: (at 17664-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2014 06:51:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41535 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WriZI-0006Fs-0p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 02:51:32 -0400 Received: from mail-yk0-f170.google.com ([209.85.160.170]:43175) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WriZC-0006FQ-4t; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 02:51:27 -0400 Received: by mail-yk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 10so4571021ykt.29 for ; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 23:51:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=A8s/ciOJi/sLRg12LfN9/rbMbRWo+xFXoytROWnfr4M=; b=CUYUvkx61GAkuchlchdE82puivDgaS9+BldZbmLidv53IGNP89x8vjsX8Gh8BNxUMX 0uBtlOLCGf8nAuFDSciN7o4WqP59kERhQtp8fsJWq5RdLriBFh9PLBvED3MUrCgolOuJ 3kWoj1Bc9+RO531+K0pJnU9TYkbsA5kwWmJWkYdgl+0M9qZqa1KpZ4E2YGf9jWl5BIJq PpspgQyGQ1ct0b629LwLD3IQNr4UAL5aTiTsny1hPS8bRBhOWJiSlJ7vMxddDCGLZyU4 dHnVr+CGswOzcyegSAOBJGfJSJa7yqd2SqfARBQybHUt41qvy/u5QczmSIGLc3IDkL9j sIKQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.113.69 with SMTP id z45mr60275120yhg.0.1401778280165; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 23:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.62.213 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 23:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.62.213 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 23:51:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <538CB819.1050103@cs.ucla.edu> References: <538C8273.7020607@cs.ucla.edu> <538CB819.1050103@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 07:51:20 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#17669: Fwd: Re: Solaris acl woes From: Ben Walton To: Paul Eggert Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3010eb117177b104fae8f0c4 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17664-done Cc: 17664-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 17669@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --20cf3010eb117177b104fae8f0c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Jun 2, 2014 6:46 PM, "Paul Eggert" wrote: > > [Forwarding this to Bug#17669 as bug-coreutils seems to have misfiled it under 17664; closing 17664.] > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Solaris acl woes > Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:56:03 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department > To: Ben Walton , bug-gnulib@gnu.org, bug-coreutils@gnu.org > > > > Ben Walton wrote: > >> The lib/file-has-acl.c:acl_ace_nontrivial code that returns 1 is: > > > Why is it returning 1, exactly? What are the value of access_masks[0, > 1] and how do they compare to the masks, and what bits are set that > shouldn't be if we want the ACLs to be trivial? I didn't get back to this yesterday but will tonight. What do you think about the fact that the Solaris tools seem to exhibit the same behavior? Thanks -Ben --20cf3010eb117177b104fae8f0c4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Jun 2, 2014 6:46 PM, "Paul Eggert" <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
>
> [Forwarding this to Bug#17669 as bug-coreutils seems to have misfiled = it under 17664; closing 17664.]
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Re: Solaris acl woes
> Date: =C2=A0 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:56:03 -0700
> From: =C2=A0 Paul Eggert <egg= ert@cs.ucla.edu>
> Organization: =C2=A0 UCLA Computer Science Department
> To: =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Ben Walton <bdwalton@gmail.com>, bug-gnul= ib@gnu.org, bug-coreutils@gnu.= org
>
>
>
> Ben Walton wrote:
>
>> The lib/file-has-acl.c:acl_ace_nontrivial code that returns 1 is:<= br> >
>
> Why is it returning 1, exactly? =C2=A0What are the value of access_mas= ks[0,
> 1] and how do they compare to the masks, and what bits are set that > shouldn't be if we want the ACLs to be trivial?

I didn't get back to this yesterday but will tonight.

What do you think about the fact that the Solaris tools seem= to exhibit the same behavior?

Thanks
-Ben

--20cf3010eb117177b104fae8f0c4-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 03 03:02:41 2014 Received: (at 17664-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2014 07:02:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41544 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wrik5-0006cY-C4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 03:02:41 -0400 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:34844) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wrik3-0006cG-84; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 03:02:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377F2A60031; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 00:02:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JvzOvh6uCIaD; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 00:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-108-0-233-62.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [108.0.233.62]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A25B8A6002B; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 00:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <538D72FF.9000607@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 00:02:23 -0700 From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Walton Subject: Re: bug#17664: bug#17669: Fwd: Re: Solaris acl woes References: <538C8273.7020607@cs.ucla.edu> <538CB819.1050103@cs.ucla.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17664-done Cc: 17664-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 17669@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) Ben Walton wrote: > What do you think about the fact that the Solaris tools seem to exhibit the > same behavior? If they do this too, then I guess we're in good company. From unknown Sat Sep 13 13:15:27 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator