Subject: bug#17625: 24.4.50; All installed packages marked "unsigned", no archive listed

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:50:35 -0400

> I think it's helpful to indicate if packages are signed--unless they
> must be signed by default, which is currently not the case.

There seems to be a misunderstanding: the current "unsigned" mention
(which I recently disabled) indicates whether an *already installed*
package had its signature checked when it was installed.

Whereas the feature you're discussing seems to be to indicate which
candidates for installation have a signature available for checking
(this is not implemented, AFAICT).

        Stefan