Subject: bug#17623: 24.4.50; incorrect example for `apply-partially' in (elisp) `Calling Functions'

From: Stefan Kangas <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 06:14:13 -0700

Michael Heerdegen <[email-masked]> writes:

> Why again was saying something like "note that unlike the built-in
> function this version accepts any number of arguments" rejected?

Would this resolve any remaining confusion in this paragraph?  If so,
adding this sounds like a reasonable outcome.  It is a true statement,
and I don't think it risks confusing things further.