From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 24 11:20:38 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 May 2014 15:20:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59203 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WoDkU-0007G4-Ds for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 11:20:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39795) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WoDkS-0007Fs-NY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 11:20:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoDkD-0008Nr-9W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 11:20:31 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58167) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoDkD-0008Nn-6I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 11:20:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoDk4-0002Rc-At for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 11:20:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoDjv-00088B-Fp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 11:20:12 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:40639) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoDjv-000877-9G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 11:20:03 -0400 Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s4OFK1I0030264 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 24 May 2014 15:20:02 GMT Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s4OFK0EI025495 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 24 May 2014 15:20:01 GMT Received: from abhmp0009.oracle.com (abhmp0009.oracle.com [141.146.116.15]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4OFK0PS009336 for ; Sat, 24 May 2014 15:20:00 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 08:19:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Drew Adams To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.4.50; `self-insert-command': Why raise an error for non-positive repetition? X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) In Emacs prior to Emacs 24, `C-0 a' or `C-- 3 a' was a no-op. Starting with Emacs 24 this raises an error. Why is this considered an improvement? If the concern is that the user might hit the wrong key and not notice the no-op, why not just use `message'? In GNU Emacs 24.4.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32) of 2014-05-17 on ODIEONE Bzr revision: 117119 eggert@cs.ucla.edu-20140517081131-ugu7ociaoec2xk7y Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 Configured using: `configure --prefix=3D/c/Devel/emacs/snapshot/trunk --enable-checking=3Dyes,glyphs 'CFLAGS=3D-O0 -g3' LDFLAGS=3D-Lc:/Devel/emacs/lib 'CPPFLAGS=3D-DGC_MCHECK=3D1 -Ic:/Devel/emacs/include'' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 29 14:02:43 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2014 18:02:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36970 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1JR5-00040x-9b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 14:02:43 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:48230 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1JR2-00040o-Bt for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 14:02:41 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1JR1-0003yL-Sn for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 14:02:39 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 14:02:39 -0400 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 17579 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) unarchive 9476 forcemerge 9476 17579 From unknown Mon Aug 18 09:01:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator