GNU bug report logs -
#17510
24.3.91; Problem with `emacs --daemon' in cygw32 build
Previous Next
Reported by: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 17:51:02 UTC
Severity: important
Found in version 24.3.91
Fixed in version 24.4
Done: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #20 received at 17510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 10:30:28 -0400
> From: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
> CC: 17510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dmantipov <at> yandex.ru
>
> On 5/18/2014 12:32 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Thanks, but you need to be more selective: which one of these changes
> > is the root cause, and why?
>
> It's not easy to be selective; these aren't independent changes. There
> used to be a `w32_display_name_list', which Dmitry removed. Along with
> this change, he removed the code that used to be in x_delete_display (to
> delete a display from the list) and replaced it by a FIXME.
Perhaps that FIXME is not relevant to Cygwin, and the removed code
should be retained in the Cygwin build.
> > In general, everything that is related to one_w32_display_info is
> > specific to the WINDOWSNT port, so perhaps the problem is that the
> > Cygwin-w32 build is incorrectly treated the same. But where exactly?
>
> Looking at the code, I don't see why this problem is specific to the
> Cygwin-w32 build.
If the Cygwin-w32 build wants more (or less) than one display_info
object, then that part _is_ specific to Cygwin, because the native
Windows build has only one such object that is never deleted.
> Can you reproduce it in the Windows build?
The native Windows build doesn't support --daemon, so no, I can't.
> I *think* what must be happening in the recipe that I gave for this bug
> is that every time a client frame is closed, x_delete_display is called.
> Before Dmitry's change, this would actually delete something from a
> list. Now it doesn't, and the server gets messed up and ultimately dies
> on the third attempt to create a client frame.
See above: try restoring that code for Cygwin only.
> Unless there's an obvious fix for this, it seems to me that we're far
> enough into the pretest that we should just revert to the old code, at
> least for emacs-24.
That would revert a useful cleanup, which I'm not sure is a good idea
at this point.
This bug report was last modified 11 years and 5 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.