GNU bug report logs -
#17510
24.3.91; Problem with `emacs --daemon' in cygw32 build
Previous Next
Reported by: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 17:51:02 UTC
Severity: important
Found in version 24.3.91
Fixed in version 24.4
Done: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #20 received at 17510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 10:30:28 -0400
> From: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
> CC: 17510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dmantipov <at> yandex.ru
>
> On 5/18/2014 12:32 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Thanks, but you need to be more selective: which one of these changes
> > is the root cause, and why?
>
> It's not easy to be selective; these aren't independent changes. There
> used to be a `w32_display_name_list', which Dmitry removed. Along with
> this change, he removed the code that used to be in x_delete_display (to
> delete a display from the list) and replaced it by a FIXME.
Perhaps that FIXME is not relevant to Cygwin, and the removed code
should be retained in the Cygwin build.
> > In general, everything that is related to one_w32_display_info is
> > specific to the WINDOWSNT port, so perhaps the problem is that the
> > Cygwin-w32 build is incorrectly treated the same. But where exactly?
>
> Looking at the code, I don't see why this problem is specific to the
> Cygwin-w32 build.
If the Cygwin-w32 build wants more (or less) than one display_info
object, then that part _is_ specific to Cygwin, because the native
Windows build has only one such object that is never deleted.
> Can you reproduce it in the Windows build?
The native Windows build doesn't support --daemon, so no, I can't.
> I *think* what must be happening in the recipe that I gave for this bug
> is that every time a client frame is closed, x_delete_display is called.
> Before Dmitry's change, this would actually delete something from a
> list. Now it doesn't, and the server gets messed up and ultimately dies
> on the third attempt to create a client frame.
See above: try restoring that code for Cygwin only.
> Unless there's an obvious fix for this, it seems to me that we're far
> enough into the pretest that we should just revert to the old code, at
> least for emacs-24.
That would revert a useful cleanup, which I'm not sure is a good idea
at this point.
This bug report was last modified 11 years and 58 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.