GNU bug report logs - #17468
fill-paragraph vs. line endings

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 19:17:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Subject: bug#17468: closed (Re: bug#17468: Perl modules)
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 16:39:04 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#17468: fill-paragraph vs. line endings

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 17468 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
17468: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17468
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel <at> gnu.org, 17468-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#17468: Perl modules
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:37:57 +0200
Fixed in 3a09e1d, which will be in 0.8.

Ludo’.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel <at> gnu.org, bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: Perl modules
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 21:16:19 +0200
Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> skribis:

> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 01:31:12PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> But there’s no tool that really “interprets” of what’s in the
>> ‘description’ field[*].  What do you mean?
>> [*] Actually, ‘fill-paragraph’ from (guix ui), which is used for the
>>     output of ‘guix package --search’ does some very basic
>>     interpretation.
>
> Well, the output of "guix package --search" has different line breaks than
> those present in the string of the description field. So something modifies
> it,

Yes, that’s ‘fill-paragraph’.

> maybe the scheme interpreter itself in what it does with multi-line
> strings, maybe the function you mention. In any case, "x.\nY" may be
> output as "x. Y"; so if we wish to have double spaces in the output,
> we need to write "x.  Y" on the same line.

That’s really a bug in ‘fill-paragraph’.

I’m filing it now and will look at it later, unless someone beats me.
;-)

Ludo’.



This bug report was last modified 10 years and 290 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.