GNU bug report logs -
#17219
24.3.50; wrong alignment when a list is given to dired
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hi Jakub,
On 22/12/24 11:08 PM, Jakub Ječmínek via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the
Swiss army knife of text editors wrote:
> It seems that adding simple `dired--align-all-files' to the end of
> `dired-revert' resolves this.
>
> From 41780fde84fe1c55a0a7417a833dc0b8303a3db8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Jakub=20Je=C4=8Dm=C3=ADnek?= <kuba <at> kubajecminek.cz>
> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 21:53:53 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Align files after dired revert (Bug#17219)
>
> * lisp/dired.el (dired-revert): Add dired--align-all-files
> function call.
> ---
> lisp/dired.el | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lisp/dired.el b/lisp/dired.el
> index 028b862d159..acd31fb6424 100644
> --- a/lisp/dired.el
> +++ b/lisp/dired.el
> @@ -2157,7 +2157,8 @@ dired-revert
> (if (dired-goto-subdir dir)
> (dired-hide-subdir 1))))
> (unless modflag (restore-buffer-modified-p nil))
> - (hack-dir-local-variables-non-file-buffer))
> + (hack-dir-local-variables-non-file-buffer)
> + (dired--align-all-files))
What about performance? Depending on the size of the directory,
recalculating alignment could have a minor performance impact.
> ;; outside of the let scope
> ;;; Might as well not override the user if the user changed this.
> ;;; (setq buffer-read-only t)
--
C. Mitrodimas
This bug report was last modified 184 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.