Subject: Re: bug#17168: 24.3.50; Segfault at mark_object

From: Dmitry Antipov <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 09:05:33 +0400

On 04/06/2014 02:37 AM, Daniel Colascione wrote:

> The patch came out more complicated than I'd hoped.

My first impression is that the patch to remove pure storage at all will have nearly
the same size and complexity. I.e. the whole thing becomes grossly overengineered.

Dmitry