Subject: Re: bug#17073: 24.3.50; file-symlink-p doesn't return t as described in the doc

From: Michael Heerdegen <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:37:43 +0100

Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:

> Thanks.  Can this be closed, then?

The changes in the manual look great, thanks.

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but:

  If the leading directories of @var{filename} include symbolic links,
  this function recursively follows them.

Is this obvious? If not - doesn't it also belong in the docstring?

Thanks,
Michael.