From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:03:15 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#17069 <17069@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#17069 <17069@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.4.50; HAVE_GLIB is not defined when gfilenotify is the only user Reply-To: bug#17069 <17069@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:03:15 +0000 retitle 17069 24.4.50; HAVE_GLIB is not defined when gfilenotify is the onl= y user reassign 17069 emacs submitter 17069 YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu severity 17069 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 23 04:59:13 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2014 08:59:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45380 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WReFM-0004r2-TX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:59:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55782) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WReFJ-0004qr-Gl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:59:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WReFD-00045F-64 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:59:09 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:44750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WReFD-00045A-3E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:59:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WReF7-0001mz-Gm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:59:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WReF2-0003yT-2r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:58:57 -0400 Received: from mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp ([133.82.132.2]:60739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WReF1-0003yN-OR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:58:51 -0400 Received: from fermat.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (fermat [133.82.132.10]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0566C055D for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 17:58:47 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 17:58:47 +0900 Message-ID: From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.4.50; HAVE_GLIB is not defined when gfilenotify is the only user User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Steps to reproduce: 1. Install glib. 2. ./configure --with-x-toolkit=athena --without-rsvg Result: In src/config.h, HAVE_GFILENOTIFY is defined, but not for HAVE_GLIB. (I guess the latter is necessary for proper gfilenotify support.) YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp In GNU Emacs 24.4.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw scroll bars) of 2014-03-23 on ubuntu Repository revision: 116853 dancol@dancol.org-20140323060236-dtlsz33veq7asjfb Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11103000 System Description: Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS Configured using: `configure --with-x-toolkit=athena --without-rsvg' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 23 05:24:39 2014 Received: (at 17069-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2014 09:24:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45385 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRedy-0005Uq-Bq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 05:24:38 -0400 Received: from dancol.org ([96.126.100.184]:59284) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRedu-0005Ug-DC for 17069-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 05:24:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=3eU2YEZw5b5OLUvvHGaOFdafCLeoECgPZmabx5mzdu0=; b=JHmoVtME7uqRo8iPXQWeMZQ1/7DFEzF1Cu0MloIt4oNO0BgN3e0vLePuLp1ci5t5x1qEhDx+sg1XQbjlcvYZmrl0jN1RGceqHM5XcjWwyfXB1yYtjxui/AzpR1DhYndSNHLODPD8H0so5pji/NfDIeDHx90K2SV7EL2b3ZzhqFz5fQfqh9Hl3SKbM4FWb83EG6+72Br0h4Wa3MnJkDNVFdzyy3HV1VxA4UO+N/8LQto8JX1StL0u75rOYkGhuIyF12Xz3GBe1+jxaT4LONZg4g049Q+E4FeX12cugdOHA+/aQCiY4t6oLG+AuLbcNbWYD5gM5bQekn0pA0llAdAuJA==; Received: from [2601:8:b200:551::2b1] by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WRedt-0001We-HI for 17069-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 02:24:33 -0700 Message-ID: <532EA850.1030708@dancol.org> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 02:24:32 -0700 From: Daniel Colascione User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 17069-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Fixed X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w1oExmCHx7TM1cgKbNf2BxfE4IskFWptH" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17069-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --w1oExmCHx7TM1cgKbNf2BxfE4IskFWptH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fixed in trust r116856.. --w1oExmCHx7TM1cgKbNf2BxfE4IskFWptH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTLqhQAAoJEMAaIROpHW7IsmQP/1h5ZpRHHaiItMoV6CjKhetU N6UnkV/rTbMp+KeENpOiYb744X66koybJN/XfYeVZPNCeWgxT4rQZm18Y2Jhxfdr +EKVFFhRH01UAPGBxxemgxnImC69w4Ixs67JijJHtCaKVSdzcVZKSIrDwE1GfqxH JFaJUdsI0lEuwuPkFEyrlSxSwukE0z3t63oBludgPzUfb0RgSpvbKbc/zBsRXZr5 kpAFWtmsRz16KTTCkmkJMdRvcuprksDbbXDTOGr5Hs/TITw7iOSHwn/Iaz7ldnw0 ubWNeT4pEvRBAlJ98IR+pRrG15Zbfswmdk9Ro260NJC+Yl8YR/NE9zUlQep441nd nX8MHO85Au7xGhOJCZJwhLVKRknpcIsrHQeEX/qd87qmQFXVpg06QI5bNN5WiGt9 aNeAuAD6n3bIUx4zc6zooggHEzYLtfuvmE6SHvAhPYlKD2Vakr+l8CQbDspdvE06 4s+vHmkoENfj4+L8uiKw5Tr6jNBGvbVs3ZEh868OC09XRoJxiVSFNwVzNBrtFgHk G962T7iBjhkmMvHErq/jmZT0debbKSJX1m/5vYoRXbQWOVdK9qLWxuY1BhkUAlKM 2alT8gzOpL3BJe2OCnokQ4LF6BXzYQi0GMKoKe2tsiwbXZl3vDAF55wIyhwcZViL XrX7xQCvgXzdft8bYP9X =x3Xx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --w1oExmCHx7TM1cgKbNf2BxfE4IskFWptH-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 23 12:13:56 2014 Received: (at 17069) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2014 16:13:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46027 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRl24-0001Lj-E0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:13:56 -0400 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:56245) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRl21-0001LX-U3 for 17069@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:13:55 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N2W00B00CXK0700@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 17069@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:13:52 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N2W00AL5D34Y150@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:13:52 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:13:40 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#17069: Fixed In-reply-to: <532EA850.1030708@dancol.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Daniel Colascione Message-id: <83fvm83nbf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <532EA850.1030708@dancol.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17069 Cc: 17069@debbugs.gnu.org, mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 02:24:32 -0700 > From: Daniel Colascione > > Fixed in trust r116856.. Thanks, but why on the trunk? The same problem exists on the release branch, no? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 23 14:34:53 2014 Received: (at 17069) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2014 18:34:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46118 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnES-0005K5-Uh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:34:53 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:46314) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnEQ-0005Jx-82 for 17069@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:34:50 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnEP-0005Ii-5b; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:34:49 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#17069: Fixed References: <532EA850.1030708@dancol.org> <83fvm83nbf.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: Al Jazeera Qaddafi embassy SEAL Team 6 morse X-Ran: z@a>/Z5zW,d?82ulMJ{l]_rHQ?lp.v3tpn(y%X4BT{@GoR#cga/U6+/0.&xzkkta#L!E0_ X-Hue: white X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:34:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83fvm83nbf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:13:40 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17069 Cc: 17069@debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel Colascione X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) In any case, can I again prod people to put Version: 24.5 (or whatever) at the start of their -done messages. Because otherwise when someone looks at http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17069 a year from now, they have a hard time figuring out which Emacs release the fix is supposed to be in. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 23 14:50:42 2014 Received: (at 17069) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2014 18:50:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46137 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnTl-0005nH-F0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:50:41 -0400 Received: from mail-yh0-f42.google.com ([209.85.213.42]:41560) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRnTh-0005n2-B0 for 17069@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:50:38 -0400 Received: by mail-yh0-f42.google.com with SMTP id t59so4412766yho.1 for <17069@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:50:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=O1D38RWeU4yAabPCcp+xZAw6bEolWcynN1FoaI6vmuc=; b=RrXnwT/rV3mD7N6bvhkavynSgjcQNxfaLgiAp1LfunOULQ3/0vfVCqnhb3J/Gg85+g MjgkL5Cbm7hl03ocQpR0gdByuL68NrZnJlLAPMZiNv/iORA60HH1bsLpV1PIP9ZS01vq 8ulZnJfT9Qcj+gyuthGHb6MGsLbkYu/3KatEOJjTqFQFGfHmbBQfzMhJsWZZuS4Su5kg QqscA8LxepH56qo4xApiH92igVHv0/ds3QyfYGxXVK/6doouzXBrNA6qubVU7gIrLNWs scUvvYCujrzoJTu93lc6+RAmEOz89f+GRJ6Ixu3JIN5ayUHzga8sQeqEUK+oaiFY1rVM fSig== X-Received: by 10.236.60.68 with SMTP id t44mr59195802yhc.47.1395600636479; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:50:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.163.3 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:49:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <532EA850.1030708@dancol.org> <83fvm83nbf.fsf@gnu.org> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:49:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#17069: Fixed To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17069 Cc: 17069@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: > In any case, can I again prod people to put > > Version: 24.5 > > (or whatever) at the start of their -done messages. Does that work in all -done messages (I mean, not Bcc:ed to control@debbugs.org)? I'm asking because AFAICS, admin/notes/bugtracker only mentions Version: in the context of reporting new bugs. Elsewhere it refers to the "fixed BUGNO VERSION" control syntax, not pseudo-headers. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 23 19:24:36 2014 Received: (at 17069) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2014 23:24:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46381 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRrkp-00063v-Re for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:24:36 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:52438) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRrkn-00063k-Iy for 17069@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:24:34 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRrkl-0004G7-KG; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:24:31 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Juanma Barranquero Subject: Re: bug#17069: Fixed References: <532EA850.1030708@dancol.org> <83fvm83nbf.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: national information infrastructure Albright Rule Psix X-Ran: k"ZMt2x X-Hue: black X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:24:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:49:56 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17069 Cc: 17069@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: > >> In any case, can I again prod people to put >> >> Version: 24.5 >> >> (or whatever) at the start of their -done messages. > > Does that work in all -done messages (I mean, not Bcc:ed to > control@debbugs.org)? Yes. In fact, only in such messages. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 23 19:27:50 2014 Received: (at 17069) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2014 23:27:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46388 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRrnx-00069A-O9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:27:50 -0400 Received: from mail-yk0-f170.google.com ([209.85.160.170]:38341) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRrnv-00068x-9b for 17069@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:27:48 -0400 Received: by mail-yk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 9so12745188ykp.1 for <17069@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:27:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=nhdVjd9p+qbqcbZMSf+2QLJS+tD9GcduUkSw+GBMDOc=; b=I9JGnfLj/OiH0SB5plUaqxbU5Q9/6IK8EOdT9IXWYTl7D+5m6DEeVsoygEG+RtyDft tJ1PusTyJ06lverRdMNkpyJWeKS7Mm8FEQMTegK++f2AscRpEjfJ9mnOh+EVOgzWUI7X 5IuDCCuHHT8BNPuclPTzxdIzMuQ+Nf9B4g7Ge+piQgckYgLovMkbormaB160fav97elj 175PUetnTlN3YVLuahz+//rQGirS7cqIql2ZbFA7aF+twLbrkjpZyCkcgPNFDIloTMmS BUW5cd3/BReDGkW7LXfV7X41vn5XelAWdYXltlITwvmqLqkBBxpUEA9Wc3sfkTMPsOuO mDTg== X-Received: by 10.236.155.106 with SMTP id i70mr5826093yhk.38.1395617265446; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:27:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.163.3 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:27:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <532EA850.1030708@dancol.org> <83fvm83nbf.fsf@gnu.org> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 00:27:05 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#17069: Fixed To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17069 Cc: 17069@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Glenn Morris wrote: > Yes. In fact, only in such messages. Good to know, thanks. I'd suggest adding that info to admin/notes/bugtracker, BTW. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 25 11:59:16 2014 Received: (at 17069) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2014 15:59:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WSTky-00055G-Cb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:59:16 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:53186) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WSTkw-000557-Im for 17069@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:59:15 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSTkv-00023H-DA; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:59:13 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#17069: Fixed References: <532EA850.1030708@dancol.org> <83fvm83nbf.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: ASIO SAPO UMTS COSCO threat satellite imagery STARLAN X-Ran: @c,<4`2O^s_ADC5pv_}[tYv8j>\n>]b(%]b7W^y&$/"`0plM_tEz{KQ[s4h43j}qD"reWf X-Hue: red X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:59:13 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17069 Cc: 17069@debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel Colascione X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 02:24:32 -0700 >> From: Daniel Colascione >> >> Fixed in trust r116856.. > > Thanks, but why on the trunk? The same problem exists on the release > branch, no? I also think this should be in emacs-24. Please could someone backport it? From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:03:15 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator