From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 05 22:03:02 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2014 03:03:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52228 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WLOaK-0006fi-2U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 22:03:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52422) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WLO8Y-0005sU-Tc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 21:34:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLO8R-0003hR-SD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 21:34:18 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:46120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLO8R-0003hN-Oq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 21:34:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54136) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLO8L-0000Ho-BV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 21:34:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLO8F-0003g9-1v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 21:34:05 -0500 Received: from outbound-smtp05.blacknight.com ([81.17.249.38]:56484) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLO8E-0003fs-NW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 21:33:58 -0500 Received: from mail.blacknight.com (pemlinmail01.blacknight.ie [81.17.254.10]) by outbound-smtp05.blacknight.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457F3210172 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 02:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22515 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2014 02:33:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO RTLaptop) (rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com@[109.76.195.243]) by 81.17.254.9 with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 6 Mar 2014 02:33:55 -0000 From: Robert Thorpe To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.3; Rmail behaviour with a username containing "@" Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 02:33:12 +0000 Message-ID: <87siqwcazb.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 22:02:58 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) My webspace provider gives usernames that are email addresses. So, the username for the smtp, pop and imap servers for this email address is "rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com". I can't use the character "@" in a username though, if it's sent to movemail then that program will confuse what follows for the server name. I.e. if I do:- (setq rmail-primary-inbox-list '("imap://rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com@myserver.com") Then everything after the first @ is taken to be the server address. I can use "%40" as in web addresses instead of the first @. If I do that then movemail works fine and all my email is downloaded into the temp file ".newmail-...." Once this happens though Rmail gets confused. Movemail creates a file containing "%" but Rmail is looking for "%40", so it can't find the file. It then report no new mail and doesn't copy the temp file into RMAIL. To solve this for myself I've edited the function rmail-insert-inbox-text just after this bit: ;; At this point, TOFILE contains the name to read: ;; Either the alternate name (if we renamed) ;; or the actual inbox (if not renaming). I've put in some code to substitute %40 for @ in tofile. That fixes the problem for me, but it's not a real fix. I think at the least the manual should tell users they can't use usernames with "@" in them. BR, Robert Thorpe In GNU Emacs 24.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2014-02-22 on chindi10, modified by Debian Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11103000 System Description: Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS Configured using: `configure '--build' 'i686-linux-gnu' '--build' 'i686-linux-gnu' '--prefix=/usr' '--sharedstatedir=/var/lib' '--libexecdir=/usr/lib' '--localstatedir=/var/lib' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--with-pop=yes' '--enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs24:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/24.3/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/24.3/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp' '--with-crt-dir=/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu' '--with-x=yes' '--with-x-toolkit=gtk3' '--with-toolkit-scroll-bars' 'build_alias=i686-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -Wall' 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro' 'CPPFLAGS=-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2'' Important settings: value of $LC_MONETARY: en_GB.UTF-8 value of $LC_NUMERIC: en_GB.UTF-8 value of $LC_TIME: en_GB.UTF-8 value of $LANG: en_GB.UTF-8 locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: RMAIL Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t buffer-read-only: t column-number-mode: t line-number-mode: t global-visual-line-mode: t visual-line-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent input: M-x r m a i l M-x r e p o r t Recent messages: Loading debian-ispell... Loading /var/cache/dictionaries-common/emacsen-ispell-default.el (source)...done Loading debian-ispell...done Loading /var/cache/dictionaries-common/emacsen-ispell-dicts.el (source)...done Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50dictionaries-common.el (source)...done For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Counting messages...done Getting mail from the remote server ... (No new mail has arrived) 0 new messages read Load-path shadows: /usr/share/emacs/24.3/site-lisp/debian-startup hides /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/debian-startup /usr/share/emacs24/site-lisp/dictionaries-common/flyspell hides /usr/share/emacs/24.3/lisp/textmodes/flyspell /usr/share/emacs24/site-lisp/dictionaries-common/ispell hides /usr/share/emacs/24.3/lisp/textmodes/ispell Features: (shadow sort gnus-util mail-extr emacsbug sendmail rmailmm message format-spec rfc822 mml easymenu mml-sec mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader mail-parse rfc2231 rmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils server time-date tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel x-win x-dnd tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list newcomment lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev minibuffer loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process dbusbind dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting move-toolbar gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty emacs) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 04 07:05:13 2020 Received: (at 16946) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2020 12:05:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43246 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kl9pp-00081O-17 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 07:05:13 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58630) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kl9pm-000815-C5 for 16946@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 07:05:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=tckEK7LDcIBDLgAi4LSCghPXx73UlAPJeX2VT3u+gE4=; b=vNF71SF0ZsFURNZrPwusLDZJSJ wxop7TyMx/3PL0V1x/QIc+F+9pMSJmCNh4R3wHurSXFLo4xDXfLMNo3q47NJvBVk8JE9HVx9RpoVp dOF+ifoSwM6+JIhjknCOT1d5BkgHY2R22cQui7bB3Ss+7Yf3ghTbjnjNvVuvrF5cg4/8=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kl9pa-0008Mw-Mo; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 13:05:03 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Robert Thorpe Subject: Re: bug#16946: 24.3; Rmail behaviour with a username containing "@" References: <87siqwcazb.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> X-Now-Playing: The Matthew Herbert Big Band's _The State Between Us (2)_: "Fiesta" Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 13:04:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87siqwcazb.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> (Robert Thorpe's message of "Thu, 06 Mar 2014 02:33:12 +0000") Message-ID: <87k0txhj4m.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Robert Thorpe writes: > My webspace provider gives usernames that are email addresses. So, the > username for the smtp, pop and imap servers for this email address is "rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com". > > I can't use the ch [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16946 Cc: 16946@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Robert Thorpe writes: > My webspace provider gives usernames that are email addresses. So, the > username for the smtp, pop and imap servers for this email address is "rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com". > > I can't use the character "@" in a username though, if it's sent to > movemail then that program will confuse what follows for the server > name. I.e. if I do:- > (setq rmail-primary-inbox-list '("imap://rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com@myserver.com") > Then everything after the first @ is taken to be the server address. (This bug report unfortunately got no response at the time.) I don't use pop3 myself, so I can't really test this. I tried looking in the changelog to see whethers anything has changed in this area, and I can't see anything in particular... but these days, we recommend the system-wide movemail implementation, which may or may not have this limitation. Are you still seeing this issue in more recent Emacs versions? Having an "@" in a user name is quote common, so it's odd that we haven't seen more bug reports about this if it's still an issue. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 04 07:05:17 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2020 12:05:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43249 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kl9pt-00081e-BS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 07:05:17 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58660) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kl9pr-00081G-Jx for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 07:05:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=V98BWubW3ggWsv3DWWodFtS0F8WFX4nD1oNP0U1Ow28=; b=HfYHcNQ868qVovqKRn8+6C11zB wFVNTe6iiqZ0aIkUidcazsmPpJ2OjLEX3T/9qowoLaLNzKWpVTuIgCEb8TSmabMMAY5RbfQy+D+X+ 5hl+SXAfO1t430PsHiyTjCmXbz2xmbIgbb1TtSw9Xd/aqGN7LlladhhQsXIzrT2AOpC0=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kl9pk-0008NF-0p for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 13:05:10 +0100 Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 13:05:06 +0100 Message-Id: <87im9hhj4d.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #16946 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 16946 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 16946 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 05 22:07:15 2020 Received: (at 16946) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2020 03:07:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klkOJ-0004nF-ID for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:07:15 -0500 Received: from outbound-smtp09.blacknight.com ([46.22.139.14]:58001) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klkOG-0004mz-EY for 16946@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:07:13 -0500 Received: from mail.blacknight.com (pemlinmail02.blacknight.ie [81.17.254.11]) by outbound-smtp09.blacknight.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41C631C530C for <16946@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 03:07:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 29983 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2020 03:07:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rt-inspiron-3480) (rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com@[109.76.74.4]) by 81.17.254.9 with ESMTPSA (AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 6 Dec 2020 03:07:06 -0000 From: Robert Thorpe To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#16946: 24.3; Rmail behaviour with a username containing "@" In-Reply-To: <87k0txhj4m.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 04 Dec 2020 13:04:57 +0100) Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 03:06:39 +0000 Message-ID: <871rg34oqo.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16946 Cc: 16946@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Robert Thorpe writes: > >> My webspace provider gives usernames that are email addresses. So, the >> username for the smtp, pop and imap servers for this email address is "rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com". >> >> I can't use the character "@" in a username though, if it's sent to >> movemail then that program will confuse what follows for the server >> name. I.e. if I do:- >> (setq rmail-primary-inbox-list '("imap://rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com@myserver.com") >> Then everything after the first @ is taken to be the server address. > > (This bug report unfortunately got no response at the time.) > > I don't use pop3 myself, so I can't really test this. I tried looking > in the changelog to see whethers anything has changed in this area, and > I can't see anything in particular... but these days, we recommend the > system-wide movemail implementation, which may or may not have this > limitation. > > Are you still seeing this issue in more recent Emacs versions? Having > an "@" in a user name is quote common, so it's odd that we haven't seen > more bug reports about this if it's still an issue. Thank you for looking at my very old bug report. I checked it recently and the problem is still there. Notice that it happens on IMAP and POP3. If you look at the code I quoted above it uses IMAP. I think it's caused by movemail from GNU Mailutils though. Mailutils can't deal with two "@" symbols (one in the username and another for the server). I can replicate this by using movemail on the command line without any Emacs involvement. I think this is a bug in mailutils. Would you agree? If so I'll report it. I'm not sure that it would be possible for the Mailutils maintainers to fix it without changing the options format for the command. On the other hand I think the options format really should be changed. The kludge to fix this is to use "%40" in the email address instead of "@". That's what I've been using. I don't know why it hasn't been reported again. Perhaps few people use Rmail and have email addresses of that sort. Or perhaps when they found the problem they searched the web and found the mailing list discussions where someone gave the "%40" hack. BR, Robert Thorpe From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 06 08:54:40 2020 Received: (at 16946) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2020 13:54:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49215 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kluUq-0001uZ-Ad for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 08:54:40 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52936) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kluUn-0001uI-St for 16946@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 08:54:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NHb0IKZ0pxwF3cYnOHNuSKlmWeN8aUdMwykrogkWTec=; b=VGCQBFOmK5UIDY3jb1dsUY4T5T Vz2RG2R7OUyHfNfqFmilnFe3G9MbKTaldzEwoP+1tfvg2QEx2r3mzg4iGL5wLgmu26wMHNrn7x/xY T67PfgnUYLiplFiT9Jr4v5t3mpX/KuD5UD4BC08iGJbBW+q76yD8PRc/jMiRHzReDqIY=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kluUd-0004lX-Rz; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 14:54:32 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Robert Thorpe Subject: Re: bug#16946: 24.3; Rmail behaviour with a username containing "@" References: <87siqwcazb.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> <871rg34oqo.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> X-Now-Playing: Joan as Police Woman's _Cover Two_: "Running" Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 14:54:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <871rg34oqo.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> (Robert Thorpe's message of "Sun, 06 Dec 2020 03:06:39 +0000") Message-ID: <87czznca5p.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Robert Thorpe writes: > I think it's caused by movemail from GNU Mailutils though. Mailutils > can't deal with two "@" symbols (one in the username and another for the > server). I can replicate this by using movemail on t [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16946 Cc: 16946@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Robert Thorpe writes: > I think it's caused by movemail from GNU Mailutils though. Mailutils > can't deal with two "@" symbols (one in the username and another for the > server). I can replicate this by using movemail on the command line > without any Emacs involvement. I think this is a bug in mailutils. > Would you agree? If so I'll report it. I'm not quite sure. As you point out: > I'm not sure that it would be possible for the Mailutils maintainers to > fix it without changing the options format for the command. On the > other hand I think the options format really should be changed. > > The kludge to fix this is to use "%40" in the email address instead of > "@". That's what I've been using. So perhaps we should just fix Emacs to allow %40, and document that. You said: > To solve this for myself I've edited the function > rmail-insert-inbox-text just after this bit: > ;; At this point, TOFILE contains the name to read: > ;; Either the alternate name (if we renamed) > ;; or the actual inbox (if not renaming). > > I've put in some code to substitute %40 for @ in tofile. That fixes the > problem for me, but it's not a real fix. Could you submit a patch for that, so that we could see what that'd look like? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 06 08:54:46 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2020 13:54:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49218 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kluUw-0001us-JU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 08:54:46 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52950) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kluUv-0001uX-0J for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 08:54:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=S4W8I9Wb9wcJlbnAqk87YB5sUpVibRapwPR821SdjXU=; b=iBpCX3e8diTY+3AnZ0E2cfGmmW KsyGiVumEobpnp2Yzv6xKDW4lnNqjD18Azhw2djn+4sNKNBqYFbg4++8ob62hebd14KH0fLYJmLIt auaTvQEqTgK7W+Sx3+REseVHtCbtc6LnjJuPRjawG5dcVgqLpF/t+Cs8t9GR4phY1G2E=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kluUn-0004nq-5y for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 14:54:39 +0100 Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 14:54:35 +0100 Message-Id: <87blf7ca5g.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #16946 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 16946 - moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 16946 - moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 06 09:13:17 2020 Received: (at 16946) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2020 14:13:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49231 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klumr-0004Sb-NO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 09:13:17 -0500 Received: from static.rcdrun.com ([95.85.24.50]:57899) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klump-0004SM-5o for 16946@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 09:13:16 -0500 Received: from localhost ([::ffff:197.157.0.57]) (AUTH: PLAIN admin, TLS: TLS1.2,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by static.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 00000000002C0007.000000005FCCE6F3.00007F68; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 14:13:07 +0000 Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 17:10:14 +0300 From: Jean Louis To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#16946: 24.3; Rmail behaviour with a username containing "@" Message-ID: References: <87siqwcazb.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> <871rg34oqo.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> <87czznca5p.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87czznca5p.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/2.0 (3d08634) (2020-11-07) X-Spam-Score: 3.6 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * Lars Ingebrigtsen [2020-12-06 16:55]: > Robert Thorpe writes: > > > I think it's caused by movemail from GNU Mailutils though. Mailutils > > can't de [...] Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [197.157.0.57 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16946 Cc: 16946@debbugs.gnu.org, Robert Thorpe X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * Lars Ingebrigtsen [2020-12-06 16:55]: > Robert Thorpe writes: > > > I think it's caused by movemail from GNU Mailutils though. Mailutils > > can't de [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [197.157.0.57 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager * Lars Ingebrigtsen [2020-12-06 16:55]: > Robert Thorpe writes: > > > I think it's caused by movemail from GNU Mailutils though. Mailutils > > can't deal with two "@" symbols (one in the username and another for the > > server). I can replicate this by using movemail on the command line > > without any Emacs involvement. I think this is a bug in mailutils. > > Would you agree? If so I'll report it. > > I'm not quite sure. As you point out: Send email to Sergey on bug-mailutils@gnu.org with reference to this bug to see if it is bug in GNU Mailutils. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 06 18:51:09 2020 Received: (at 16946) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2020 23:51:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51755 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1km3o5-0004zX-BW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 18:51:09 -0500 Received: from outbound-smtp26.blacknight.com ([81.17.249.194]:51119) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1km3o3-0004z2-1x for 16946@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 18:51:09 -0500 Received: from mail.blacknight.com (pemlinmail04.blacknight.ie [81.17.254.17]) by outbound-smtp26.blacknight.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DC05CABAD for <16946@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 23:51:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 419 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2020 23:51:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rt-inspiron-3480) (rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com@[109.76.74.4]) by 81.17.254.9 with ESMTPSA (AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 6 Dec 2020 23:51:00 -0000 From: Robert Thorpe To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#16946: 24.3; Rmail behaviour with a username containing "@" In-Reply-To: <87czznca5p.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 06 Dec 2020 14:54:26 +0100) Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 23:50:32 +0000 Message-ID: <87k0tufq9j.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16946 Cc: 16946@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Robert Thorpe writes: > >> I think it's caused by movemail from GNU Mailutils though. Mailutils >> can't deal with two "@" symbols (one in the username and another for the >> server). I can replicate this by using movemail on the command line >> without any Emacs involvement. I think this is a bug in mailutils. >> Would you agree? If so I'll report it. > > I'm not quite sure. As you point out: I think that the GNU Mailutils manual should at least mention that it's necessary. Ideally though, there should be another options format which splits up the information in a more sensible way. One where the server, username, port and password are all passed in separate options rather than one big one. I will send a message to bug-mailutils@gnu.org. >> I'm not sure that it would be possible for the Mailutils maintainers to >> fix it without changing the options format for the command. On the >> other hand I think the options format really should be changed. >> >> The kludge to fix this is to use "%40" in the email address instead of >> "@". That's what I've been using. > > So perhaps we should just fix Emacs to allow %40, and document that. > You said: > >> To solve this for myself I've edited the function >> rmail-insert-inbox-text just after this bit: >> ;; At this point, TOFILE contains the name to read: >> ;; Either the alternate name (if we renamed) >> ;; or the actual inbox (if not renaming). >> >> I've put in some code to substitute %40 for @ in tofile. That fixes the >> problem for me, but it's not a real fix. > > Could you submit a patch for that, so that we could see what that'd look > like? I forgot to tell you about that part of it. I don't need my work-around anymore. I think it's been fixed in mailutils. I don't see any fix in rmail-insert-inbox-text. The problem was the treatment of the %40. It appears in the filename "tofile" that's passed in Rmail. In the past, movemail decoded it to @ and created a file with @ in the name. That confused Rmail which didn't do that with it's tofile. So, I added (setq tofile (url-unhex-string tofile)) just before Rmail opens the file. Now though, movemail keeps the URL encoding in the filename, it keeps the %40 and doesn't change it to @. That solved that problem. But, you still have to put in %40 when setting the username, and the Rmail manual doesn't mention that. Perhaps it should, I can write a patch for that if you want. BR, Robert Thorpe From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 07 10:05:35 2020 Received: (at 16946) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2020 15:05:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54879 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmI51-0003JG-0Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 10:05:35 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38050) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmI4z-0003J2-B6 for 16946@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 10:05:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=g03XplUkPkmthnrMsnR9QQnRv2/DSAKWlD9L2ye7njs=; b=g5NEd+ufwXz7JmWeON6WoMOYrL VX19qqipVc+yDr+fixyfAtAcr9CiSw4XScCqJJGLB7w3VsDUdB4N7FaKAsjimYh+akTRb23Q/gojv fHIZZnL2M9DUafC96uX4/5p53x/wXj3NkAM9XMaryUj9msorYjjSmUaFH0WBWwzVotiA=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kmI4p-0006is-L1; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 16:05:27 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Robert Thorpe Subject: Re: bug#16946: 24.3; Rmail behaviour with a username containing "@" References: <87k0tufq9j.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEWxiF2YckxJQiaI Yjv///9BI6RqAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+QMBw4vJD2n1zoAAAGmSURBVDjLfZQBcsQg CEW1uQDICSIXELn/3fpBk8222zKzM5onCB/cUpiZuGwjrpxWCvdlUz1s7zrdoHfvrvMNxDFfDj5z E6D2rj1+imjqc14AHvzLZnq8At/2L+AbTJWPwJmrX2fmKHwucAoxW9ugjdvDcN64/QqlDpVE1i36 Bgz5o0CFMoiYocSdxzR3m6ekstujYlnxuaBiS/U3iCUyHQGcYtcWkIgvUwwKpsTWJoDm5e5aR/QJ +ndtbWWl8eEsxaJrbuLtSjf89SAXiJGhnlqp1Gx5hnpTl2Tu1Q8wxD8DK/IJqJMJL58EsupAiURr DgLMy+OsoV3Z5BGKsMBgBJAnCB2hcYwy0dx3BDgL+QhZDzi1h8dZKRtRxQ97goEuVIDoJWcMW7Ij JYr3c6AUDATSteVRx4EVKAHkF76BlJhEcbENcqir4Rmas8eo8MTlHOnihVglOkRscI1xbCtUV45p q0hWoD3A3B4n+6gJGQ23pjfAaOBkFoFLvi4PJIJZR1RUkn8AttJFWtdji6HCcWzDY5u+vcIHWE/s Bbh/NC78h/0JvgH7fYPLB098OgAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMC0xMi0wN1QxNDo0Nzoz NiswMDowMAJacvIAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjAtMTItMDdUMTQ6NDc6MzYrMDA6MDBz B8pOAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Shirley Collins's _Heart's Ease_: "Barbara Allen" Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 16:05:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k0tufq9j.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> (Robert Thorpe's message of "Sun, 06 Dec 2020 23:50:32 +0000") Message-ID: <87360hirm5.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Robert Thorpe writes: > Now though, movemail keeps the URL encoding in the filename, it keeps > the %40 and doesn't change it to @. That solved that problem. Ah, I see. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16946 Cc: 16946@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Robert Thorpe writes: > Now though, movemail keeps the URL encoding in the filename, it keeps > the %40 and doesn't change it to @. That solved that problem. Ah, I see. > But, you still have to put in %40 when setting the username, and the > Rmail manual doesn't mention that. Perhaps it should, I can write a > patch for that if you want. Yes, that would be welcome. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 14 01:09:01 2020 Received: (at 16946) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2020 06:09:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50875 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koh2b-0007EH-Hy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 01:09:01 -0500 Received: from outbound-smtp01.blacknight.com ([81.17.249.7]:59078) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koh2Y-0007E0-O8 for 16946@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 01:08:59 -0500 Received: from mail.blacknight.com (pemlinmail03.blacknight.ie [81.17.254.16]) by outbound-smtp01.blacknight.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86DA8C4A25 for <16946@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:08:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 23648 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2020 06:08:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rt-inspiron-3480) (rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com@[109.76.74.4]) by 81.17.254.9 with ESMTPSA (AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 14 Dec 2020 06:08:52 -0000 From: Robert Thorpe To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#16946: 24.3; Rmail behaviour with a username containing "@" In-Reply-To: <87360hirm5.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 07 Dec 2020 16:05:22 +0100) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:08:24 +0000 Message-ID: <87h7oohqcn.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16946 Cc: 16946@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Robert Thorpe writes: > >> But, you still have to put in %40 when setting the username, and the >> Rmail manual doesn't mention that. Perhaps it should, I can write a >> patch for that if you want. > > Yes, that would be welcome. I made an edit to rmail.texi from the emacs-27 branch. I've attached the output of "diff -u" as instructed in "Sending Patches". I have not filed copyright assignment paperwork for Emacs. BR, Robert Thorpe --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline; filename=at_prob_diff.txt --- rmail.texi 2020-12-14 05:27:47.041314124 +0000 +++ nrmail.texi 2020-12-14 05:56:34.468029100 +0000 @@ -1591,6 +1591,8 @@ Otherwise, Rmail will ask you for the password to use. @end enumerate +On some mailservers the usernames include domain information, which can mean they contain the @code{@@} symbol. The inbox specifier string uses @code{@@} to signal the start of the mailserver name. This creates confusion for movemail. If your username contains @code{@@} and you're using Mailutils movemail then you can fix this. In the username replace @code{@@} with it's URL encoding @code{%40}. + @vindex rmail-movemail-flags If you need to pass additional command-line flags to @command{movemail}, set the variable @code{rmail-movemail-flags} a list of the flags you --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 14 11:52:19 2020 Received: (at 16946) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2020 16:52:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53996 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kor58-0005Id-Rl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:52:19 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:44928) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kor57-0005IK-9a for 16946@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:52:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=FgjtouxhfqWjqdJlIbD+H1ie2Y9mTsuX/uAllhnlaYQ=; b=Sa49RUpJ1POcqix1Onfv+bn2ni O78xUWPogfbYtguz+XRaWpXw7qkzFwSowYSgGO8eN5Fk67FKpPaoQoQn2uqGR0gJaGw2OEPgabfwY aR0UCagYmMxTJ1aYYJ0mHAslTbkpj1IEZ1K+kozvWGZghgN/SyCBD35kknEidfv/bQp0=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kor4n-0004gw-UK; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:52:10 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Robert Thorpe Subject: Re: bug#16946: 24.3; Rmail behaviour with a username containing "@" References: <87h7oohqcn.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> X-Now-Playing: Efterklang's _Tripper_: =?utf-8?Q?=22Doppelg=C3=A4nger=22?= Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:51:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h7oohqcn.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> (Robert Thorpe's message of "Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:08:24 +0000") Message-ID: <87wnxkz5xv.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Robert Thorpe writes: > I made an edit to rmail.texi from the emacs-27 branch. I've attached > the output of "diff -u" as instructed in "Sending Patches". Thanks; applied to Emacs 28. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16946 Cc: 16946@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Robert Thorpe writes: > I made an edit to rmail.texi from the emacs-27 branch. I've attached > the output of "diff -u" as instructed in "Sending Patches". Thanks; applied to Emacs 28. > I have not filed copyright assignment paperwork for Emacs. It's small enough to apply without assignment. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 14 11:52:33 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2020 16:52:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53999 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kor5N-0005J4-3B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:52:33 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:44942) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kor5I-0005Io-8R for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:52:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KfgM9qnfoJy9f9hYYV4S/ess3LbIxZl1ka97qUcVMmg=; b=fXuw1rsZl0LfCDN76BzeEX/37S h1l/bnjrRQZJkdIqz8KbzHtRaGlKxyE1BSqQUgK9kUGr/BcaBn/pcOKX+fDtMeoQx34oABXjVAYQH 6yLkRfvf0cgIbKkj/OFRc0CsyqT+09yyVTE3jbYHmp+tNlsPyqKpgiB70eG+rzW8WMVI=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kor5A-0004hG-Ln for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:52:22 +0100 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:52:19 +0100 Message-Id: <87v9d4z5x8.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #16946 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 16946 fixed close 16946 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 16946 fixed close 16946 28.1 quit From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:15:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator