Subject: bug#16828: 24.3.50; eval-expression, character representation of integer results time-consuming

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 00:09:24 +0300

> From: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 16:52:20 -0400
> 
> >> +(octal, hexadecimal, and character if
> >> +@code{eval-expression-print-maximum-character} allows it).
> >
> > Please add a "see below" here, as the description of the variable is
> > several dozens of lines farther.
> 
> Right.  Is it okay to have nested parentheses?

Personally, I prefer to use commas in these cases:

 +(octal, hexadecimal, and character if
 +@code{eval-expression-print-maximum-character}, described below, allows it).

Thanks, the new version is fine with me.