GNU bug report logs - #16740
24.2; Please allow C-p and C-n in minibuffer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Ed Avis <eda <at> waniasset.com>

Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:05:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: moreinfo

Found in version 24.2

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Forwarded to https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2014-02/msg00045.html

Full log


Message #17 received at 16740 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
To: Ed Avis <eda <at> waniasset.com>
Cc: "16740 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <16740 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#16740: 24.2; Please allow C-p and C-n in minibuffer
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:41:16 +0100
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Ed Avis <eda <at> waniasset.com> wrote:
>>IOW, I'd rather change bash behavior to match the Emacs one, instead
>>of the other way around.
>
> I expected that to be the response.  And no doubt on the bash mailing
> list it would be the opposite.  I will ask them though.  To my mind the
> best resolution is for both programs to accept both keybindings.

I think that having different meanings for C-p/C-n and M-p/M-n would
give a richer user interface, also in bash, because it would allow, on
one hand to browse the command history (with M-p/M-n) while at the
same time move vertically within a single multiline command (with
C-p/C-n).  Just like in Emacs.   IMO that would be TRT.

-- 
Dani Moncayo




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 223 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.