GNU bug report logs - #16731
24.3.50; Latin small letter sharp s is not considered lower-case

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jorgen Schaefer <forcer <at> forcix.cx>

Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:31:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 10576

Found in version 24.3.50

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #52 received at 16731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler <at> easy-emacs.de>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 
 Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 16731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#16731: 24.3.50; Latin small letter sharp s is not considered
 lower-case
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:02:08 +0100
Am 13.02.2014 18:39, schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
>> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
>> Cc: andreas.roehler <at> easy-emacs.de,  16731 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:10:49 -0500
>>
>>>   /* True if C is upper case.  */
>>> -INLINE bool uppercasep (int c) { return downcase (c) != c; }
>>> +INLINE bool uppercasep (int c)
>>> +{
>>> +  Lisp_Object val;
>>> +
>>> +  if (downcase (c) != c)
>>> +    return true;
>>> +
>>> +  if (NILP (Vunicode_category_table))
>>> +    return false;
>>> +
>>> +  val = CHAR_TABLE_REF (Vunicode_category_table, c);
>>> +  return INTEGERP (val) && XINT (val) == UNICODE_CATEGORY_Lu;
>>> +}
>>
>> Doesn't sound too bad.  But it does beg the question: why check
>> (downcase (c) != c) at all, then?
>
> Because it's faster, and for most characters will do the job.
>

Maybe I'm missing the point: all change needed is not to store "ß" into the uppercase-table.
Why not store nil there instead?





This bug report was last modified 3 years and 311 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.