From unknown Sat Aug 09 22:37:49 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#16696 <16696@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#16696 <16696@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: frameset-to-register: Different from frame-configuration-to-register? Reply-To: bug#16696 <16696@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:37:49 +0000 retitle 16696 frameset-to-register: Different from frame-configuration-to-r= egister? reassign 16696 emacs submitter 16696 Juanma Barranquero severity 16696 normal tag 16696 moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 08 15:41:23 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 20:41:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58246 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCEiJ-0003mi-17 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:41:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56858) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCEiG-0003mY-DM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:41:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCEiF-0006SW-5r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:41:20 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:42827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCEiF-0006SR-3E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:41:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCEiD-0005qb-TI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:41:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCEiC-0006Ra-Mh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:41:17 -0500 Received: from mail-yh0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22f]:58820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCEiC-0006RC-Cw; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:41:16 -0500 Received: by mail-yh0-f47.google.com with SMTP id c41so3788871yho.6 for ; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:41:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=WRe7hnOAcqwMetBv5xzFhjm7IIuDQaY5d5oZPX7C5G4=; b=IMEQR8PaHJGf/FG5jO1T5MjtMEBcsWeNgwgvNBRH7yFs9UjCXAzc9qdnY7CiXhnIvg I59eMw3U/w03tpqG964RHWIXuajAUAYkwZt3mjSJVlISmLlODb9dhI2rGuRzN6R8sZGz N+/Bn/8YmxK+UWbTmNT+Wa1iXK1X2xnFrwEQpeBu4dFkmFWqz883wDE1YzDKshkpXIBg FJ6VjvmV8fjjdrtr9QDGT9RaquvLti1W9nlPLA3MSDwwzEshX2kuVdijdB1Eb/rrm6g3 rZ3fHPqx3qRk7iRy6qrhOFI/JsmD7vJiKMVpDN6YTnRgZ/VSIeoPAdAofCXP/XziIcCv 6Cwg== X-Received: by 10.236.7.100 with SMTP id 64mr17990024yho.23.1391892074760; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:41:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.84.65 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 12:40:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <21238.34299.271423.45527@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <21238.34299.271423.45527@gargle.gargle.HOWL> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 21:40:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: frameset-to-register: Different from frame-configuration-to-register? To: "T.V. Raman" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Bug-Gnu-Emacs , Emacs developers X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Package: emacs Version: 24.3.50 I'm creating a bug report for this, but I am not able to reproduce it. Could you please answer to the bug thread and put a step-by-step recipe starting from emacs -Q? TIA, Juanma ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: T. V. Raman Date: Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 8:31 PM Subject: frameset-to-register: Different from frame-configuration-to-register? To: emacs-devel@gnu.org If you do C-x rf to invoke the new frameset-to-register -- and later attempt to jump to that configuration via C-x rj it throws an error like so: this does not happen with the older command frmae-configuration-to-register. Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Register doesn't contain a buffer position or configuration") signal(error ("Register doesn't contain a buffer position or configuration")) error("Register doesn't contain a buffer position or configuration") #[513 "\301 !\302 !\203Y \211G\303Y\203Y \211\304H >\203Y \211\304H >\204& \305\306\307\310#\210\211\311H\2043 \305\312\313 !\"\210\211\304H >\204A \305\306\307\310#\210\211\311H \304H >\204R \305\306\314\310#\210 \315H!\202\362 \211:\203v \316 @!\203v \317 @ ?\"\210\211\211A@\262 b\202\362 \211:\203\221 \320 @!\203\221 \321 @!\210\211\211A@\262 b\202\362 \322 !\203\254 \323 !\204\241 \305\324!\210\325\323 !!\210\211b\202\362 \211:\203\277 \211@\326=\203\277 \327 A!\202\362 \211:\203\357 \211@\330=\203\357 \331 A@!\204\342 \332\333\334 A@\"!\204\342 \305\335!\210\327 A@!\210\336 8b\202\362 \305\337!\207" [cl-struct-registerv-tags get-register vectorp 5 0 error "%s accessing a non-%s" registerv-jump-func registerv 3 "Don't know how to jump to register %s" single-key-description registerv-data 1 frame-configuration-p set-frame-configuration window-configuration-p set-window-configuration markerp marker-buffer "That register's buffer no longer exists" switch-to-buffer file find-file file-query find-buffer-visiting y-or-n-p format "Visit file %s again? " "Register access aborted" 2 "Register doesn't contain a buffer position or configuration"] 8 2384059 (byte-code "\301\302! D\207" [current-prefix-arg register-read-with-preview "Jump to register: "] 2)](102 nil) ad-Advice-jump-to-register(#[513 "\301 !\302 !\203Y \211G\303Y\203Y \211\304H >\203Y \211\304H >\204& \305\306\307\310#\210\211\311H\2043 \305\312\313 !\"\210\211\304H >\204A \305\306\307\310#\210\211\311H \304H >\204R \305\306\314\310#\210 \315H!\202\362 \211:\203v \316 @!\203v \317 @ ?\"\210\211\211A@\262 b\202\362 \211:\203\221 \320 @!\203\221 \321 @!\210\211\211A@\262 b\202\362 \322 !\203\254 \323 !\204\241 \305\324!\210\325\323 !!\210\211b\202\362 \211:\203\277 \211@\326=\203\277 \327 A!\202\362 \211:\203\357 \211@\330=\203\357 \331 A@!\204\342 \332\333\334 A@\"!\204\342 \305\335!\210\327 A@!\210\336 8b\202\362 \305\337!\207" [cl-struct-registerv-tags get-register vectorp 5 0 error "%s accessing a non-%s" registerv-jump-func registerv 3 "Don't know how to jump to register %s" single-key-description registerv-data 1 frame-configuration-p set-frame-configuration window-configuration-p set-window-configuration markerp marker-buffer "That register's buffer no longer exists" switch-to-buffer file find-file file-query find-buffer-visiting y-or-n-p format "Visit file %s again? " "Register access aborted" 2 "Register doesn't contain a buffer position or configuration"] 8 2384059 (byte-code "\301\302! D\207" [current-prefix-arg register-read-with-preview "Jump to register: "] 2)] 102 nil) apply(ad-Advice-jump-to-register #[513 "\301 !\302 !\203Y \211G\303Y\203Y \211\304H >\203Y \211\304H >\204& \305\306\307\310#\210\211\311H\2043 \305\312\313 !\"\210\211\304H >\204A \305\306\307\310#\210\211\311H \304H >\204R \305\306\314\310#\210 \315H!\202\362 \211:\203v \316 @!\203v \317 @ ?\"\210\211\211A@\262 b\202\362 \211:\203\221 \320 @!\203\221 \321 @!\210\211\211A@\262 b\202\362 \322 !\203\254 \323 !\204\241 \305\324!\210\325\323 !!\210\211b\202\362 \211:\203\277 \211@\326=\203\277 \327 A!\202\362 \211:\203\357 \211@\330=\203\357 \331 A@!\204\342 \332\333\334 A@\"!\204\342 \305\335!\210\327 A@!\210\336 8b\202\362 \305\337!\207" [cl-struct-registerv-tags get-register vectorp 5 0 error "%s accessing a non-%s" registerv-jump-func registerv 3 "Don't know how to jump to register %s" single-key-description registerv-data 1 frame-configuration-p set-frame-configuration window-configuration-p set-window-configuration markerp marker-buffer "That register's buffer no longer exists" switch-to-buffer file find-file file-query find-buffer-visiting y-or-n-p format "Visit file %s again? " "Register access aborted" 2 "Register doesn't contain a buffer position or configuration"] 8 2384059 (byte-code "\301\302! D\207" [current-prefix-arg register-read-with-preview "Jump to register: "] 2)] (102 nil)) jump-to-register(102 nil) call-interactively(jump-to-register nil nil) command-execute(jump-to-register) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 09 18:08:36 2014 Received: (at 16696) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2014 23:08:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60966 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCdUJ-0006Ao-Qw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:08:36 -0500 Received: from mail-yk0-f175.google.com ([209.85.160.175]:56262) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCdUH-0006Ad-4N for 16696@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:08:33 -0500 Received: by mail-yk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 131so5179732ykp.6 for <16696@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 15:08:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=AklXiLyvgKippi5v58pNAT8A3qELhkDxa2icUzvUpI8=; b=kFKq2Afsl4fb612YNHUzE3JugQ76/cDaDEhK7pmHYMEUpXVUiceAXYjWLUCGv24LIQ bN6nefb5S5HiRsgDqKfwqVurVv2HXSM37iigDIVDZVELyym+ep2b30CqnHYIOwJFE+Fx P9DbgYR+qjuEdHl0/bKTCZH/gLw8VCitq2GTbX0zrF0OAzR244hJHUDchD/XpwU2Expx yS1jXtjCVXG+M562en/fXyqBUabgNQAgH9SQefFvZLAuMr8mqJnOWCOEl8zbCYq+ggn4 hIDLwOcQ3hDtGkbD6gofo5d+THIHMU8hxyUahQCGdGS2e4LK0LMhX9AIBTfmsUYV7sZ4 nplQ== X-Received: by 10.236.128.97 with SMTP id e61mr13453714yhi.43.1391987312533; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 15:08:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.84.65 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 15:07:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ha88aqsy.fsf@gmail.com> References: <21238.34299.271423.45527@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87ha88aqsy.fsf@gmail.com> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:07:52 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: frameset-to-register: Different from frame-configuration-to-register? To: 16696@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16696 Cc: raman X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Following your recipe, I do not see the same error that you reported. I get a message "Marker points into wrong buffer: #", but the frame is restored. I'll have to look into it. As for making a bug report, it already exists and it's bug#16696 (I'm forwarding this message to that bug thread). Please answer any followup comment there and not to emacs-devel. Thanks, Juanma ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: raman Date: Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:01 PM Subject: Re: frameset-to-register: Different from frame-configuration-to-register? To: emacs.devel@gnu.org To repro, make sure you switch buffers etc after invoking C-x rf so the config you jump to with C-x rj is different from your current setup. So repro steps: 1. M-x calendar 2. C-x4b *scratch* 3. C-xrf a 4. M-x shell 5. C-x 1 6. C-xrj a Re filing a detailed bug report, I've stayed away because I was afraid I'd not be able to do that from the comfort of Emacs -- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 11 15:52:00 2014 Received: (at 16696) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2014 20:52:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47889 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDKJE-0000hX-AD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:52:00 -0500 Received: from mail-yh0-f52.google.com ([209.85.213.52]:48468) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDKJC-0000hE-DK for 16696@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:51:58 -0500 Received: by mail-yh0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a41so7411844yho.39 for <16696@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:51:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=FnhhAVnTmtjYfcJN9TdstUkaISEmzdzcIONBub1mt+I=; b=C2IocRgk6B/pt4w6qfwUf6zFlvoYfRuDizxC9L3xlL/y2idnzoqwF59wpcl7Caa2I0 f2yu0IITlTsnTA2l5PtUxATsy9QZD11x5QmOXF2XoKfKpeewPFH+4NISysElk9uT1nIm 7VntRp0ln+2NW2ot8sU8a2OfW4Yt3SQI7L8E5f92aDWM+CcXFFyWK7YnCdOWuCMAEO6L xG/HyxSFkKm2gTB1bzrecXFj8yjYAeCHuY+uKR2W0upkvmuyK1zyc0ndOYsXIadwbxPY /nzUxmpyMO+SPyaaKdZz7QzWr+7r23nY3LivuVWRbKrNV8W7lmdUkFPZTZftXllTWlsf fJVQ== X-Received: by 10.236.20.75 with SMTP id o51mr4263635yho.65.1392151912400; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:51:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.84.65 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:51:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <21238.34299.271423.45527@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87ha88aqsy.fsf@gmail.com> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:51:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#16696: Fwd: frameset-to-register: Different from frame-configuration-to-register? To: 16696@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16696 Cc: raman X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) I've fixed the bug I was able to reproduce. Could you please try to reproduce your problem with the current trunk? Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 12 22:10:32 2014 Received: (at 16696-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2014 03:10:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49776 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDmh6-0002jP-5W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:10:32 -0500 Received: from mail-yh0-f52.google.com ([209.85.213.52]:39125) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDmh4-0002jC-2v for 16696-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:10:30 -0500 Received: by mail-yh0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a41so9425806yho.25 for <16696-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:10:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=O71buOHhlldbE3WOrCEB/8HvsPpF2757Ap6gXJirRto=; b=xn/cwRvaqeQnNenPI2LSwrbhIuT8il+g7/hBVBNcZpGIsrI2VjG3DcqY0hP+Vikv5S ogjkuLDVGJ8ZCd/jvuNudScURu5gTbFH5rp7NgBuhBx56I3koPmE45er6lhjMAtGXX0/ buBlp9bQSUcstbCxtWwUkzTjEy5tkW9gIuSo77xN/srWUNnCnVkhZ1NK0RfgCPQGta73 YXUVnzR39r8/SqsfYRiHr5WcRLolZ47qUoHxZ+xLaD1h8dyOb1ereiDsfkrUFtBXFxVA jVblO2bo8QLL7cvE8ULcXiGFHhd69JIe1T4E8h0C77CktJwThouKnXtabpZDWP9Wq1Br sKhg== X-Received: by 10.236.172.33 with SMTP id s21mr40476yhl.71.1392261024145; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:10:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.84.65 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:09:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <21244.12202.955822.122575@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <21238.34299.271423.45527@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87ha88aqsy.fsf@gmail.com> <21244.12202.955822.122575@gargle.gargle.HOWL> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 04:09:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#16696: Fwd: frameset-to-register: Different from frame-configuration-to-register? To: "T.V. Raman" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16696-done Cc: 16696-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:36 AM, T. V. Raman wrote: > works. Great. Closing. From unknown Sat Aug 09 22:37:49 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator