From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:44 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13917345231369 (code B ref -1); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:56:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2014 00:55:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBZix-0000Lu-6Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:55:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43510) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBZis-0000Lg-Ea for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:55:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBZil-0006RV-8D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:55:14 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:52865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBZil-0006RI-62 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:55:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBZie-0006WK-UM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:55:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBZiV-0005yS-Tz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:55:00 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:41999) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBZiV-0005xx-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:54:51 -0500 Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBZiD-0005FH-Q2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 01:54:34 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 16:53:28 -0800 Message-ID: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1WBZiD-0005FH-Q2 X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392339274.42943@j8OL0vwlS5J0pGabS0Di9g X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) This has happened to me a handful of times now. I'm reading news, and then Emacs will suddenly halt. Connecting to Emacs with gdb gives me the backtrace below. Emacs will consume 100% CPU at this point. I've got the Emacs connected to gdb if anybody wants me to output some data values... #0 0x0000003f4de29e3c in XIfEvent () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 #1 0x0000003f4de706e4 in _XimXRead () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 #2 0x0000003f4de71330 in _XimReadData () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 #3 0x0000003f4de71621 in _XimRead () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 #4 0x0000003f4de5fa58 in _XimProtoDestroyIC () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 #5 0x0000003f4de4e042 in XDestroyIC () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 #6 0x00000000004c58cc in free_frame_xic (f=f@entry=0x3844808) at xfns.c:2041 #7 0x00000000004bd34c in x_free_frame_resources (f=0x3844808) at xterm.c:9201 #8 0x00000000004bd67b in x_destroy_window (f=) at xterm.c:9293 #9 0x0000000000422fda in delete_frame (frame=, force=12207810) at frame.c:1378 #10 0x00000000004b4450 in x_connection_closed (dpy=dpy@entry=0x1378070, error_message=, error_message@entry=0x7fffbe39c450 "Connection lost to X server `:0'") at xterm.c:7569 #11 0x00000000004b44fc in x_io_error_quitter (display=0x1378070) at xterm.c:7696 #12 0x0000003f4de43cce in _XIOError () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 #13 0x0000003f4de417ba in _XReadEvents () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 #14 0x0000003f4de29e51 in XIfEvent () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 #15 0x0000003f4de706e4 in _XimXRead () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 #16 0x0000003f4de71330 in _XimReadData () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 #17 0x0000003f4de71621 in _XimRead () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 #18 0x0000003f4de600d6 in _XimProtoSetICValues () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 #19 0x0000003f4de4e2ad in XSetICValues () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 #20 0x00000000004c59b3 in xic_set_preeditarea (w=w@entry=0x479df28, x=x@entry=55, y=y@entry=528) at xfns.c:2061 #21 0x00000000004b4ce5 in x_draw_window_cursor (w=0x479df28, glyph_row=, x=55, y=528, cursor_type=, cursor_width=, on_p=, active_p=) at xterm.c:7265 #22 0x0000000000454fd3 in display_and_set_cursor (w=w@entry=0x479df28, on=on@entry=true, hpos=5, vpos=24, x=55, y=528) at xdisp.c:26983 #23 0x00000000004b3a4c in x_update_window_end (w=0x479df28, cursor_on_p=, mouse_face_overwritten_p=) at xterm.c:546 #24 0x000000000041b1cd in update_window (w=w@entry=0x479df28, force_p=, force_p@entry=true) at dispnew.c:3486 #25 0x000000000041c49b in update_window_tree (w=w@entry=0x479df28, force_p=force_p@entry=true) at dispnew.c:3161 #26 0x000000000041e8fd in update_frame (f=f@entry=0x3844808, force_p=, force_p@entry=false, inhibit_hairy_id_p=inhibit_hairy_id_p@entry=false) at dispnew.c:3059 #27 0x000000000044b39d in redisplay_internal () at xdisp.c:13728 #28 0x000000000044c3f5 in redisplay () at xdisp.c:12911 #29 0x00000000004e34c1 in read_char (commandflag=1, map=map@entry=244463206, prev_event=12030258, used_mouse_menu=used_mouse_menu@entry=0x7fffbe39f0ab, end_time=end_time@entry=0x0) at keyboard.c:2563 #30 0x00000000004e4e23 in read_key_sequence ( keybuf=keybuf@entry=0x7fffbe39f180, prompt=12030258, dont_downcase_last=dont_downcase_last@entry=false, can_return_switch_frame=can_return_switch_frame@entry=true, fix_current_buffer=fix_current_buffer@entry=true, prevent_redisplay=prevent_redisplay@entry=false, bufsize=30) at keyboard.c:9071 #31 0x00000000004e6a40 in command_loop_1 () at keyboard.c:1445 #32 0x0000000000546f6e in internal_condition_case ( bfun=bfun@entry=0x4e6850 , handlers=, hfun=hfun@entry=0x4dd920 ) at eval.c:1345 #33 0x00000000004d90de in command_loop_2 (ignore=ignore@entry=12030258) at keyboard.c:1170 #34 0x0000000000546e7b in internal_catch (tag=12077618, func=func@entry=0x4d90c0 , arg=12030258) at eval.c:1109 #35 0x00000000004dd547 in command_loop () at keyboard.c:1149 #36 recursive_edit_1 () at keyboard.c:777 #37 0x00000000004dd832 in Frecursive_edit () at keyboard.c:841 #38 0x0000000000415cb5 in main (argc=, argv=0x7fffbe39f4d8) at emacs.c:1643 In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.9 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.8.8) of 2014-01-31 on building.gnus.org Repository revision: 116225 larsi@gnus.org-20140131210813-a5izp5d716k2jwv5 Windowing system distributor `Fedora Project', version 11.0.11404000 Important settings: value of $LANG: en_GB.utf8 value of $XMODIFIERS: @im=ibus locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix Major mode: Fundamental Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t electric-indent-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t buffer-read-only: t line-number-mode: t Recent input: M-x r e p o r Recent messages: For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort gnus-util emacsbug message format-spec rfc822 mml easymenu mml-sec mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util help-fns mail-prsvr mail-utils package ido flyspell ispell dired cl-macs gv add-log mail-extr jka-compr cl cl-loaddefs cl-lib time-date tooltip electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel x-win x-dnd tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list newcomment lisp-mode prog-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev minibuffer nadvice loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process gfilenotify dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting move-toolbar gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty emacs) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:44 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 07:40:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.139175877722715 (code B ref 16676); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 07:40:03 +0000 Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2014 07:39:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54176 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBg28-0005uD-Ax for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 02:39:36 -0500 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:42433) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBg1x-0005tv-Rt for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 02:39:26 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0M00E007TQT800@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:39:20 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N0M00E1Y7XJLV30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:39:20 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:39:20 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 16:53:28 -0800 > > This has happened to me a handful of times now. I'm reading news, and > then Emacs will suddenly halt. > > Connecting to Emacs with gdb gives me the backtrace below. Emacs will > consume 100% CPU at this point. Doesn't the following part of the backtrace (in particular, frame #10) explain what happened? > #9 0x0000000000422fda in delete_frame (frame=, force=12207810) > at frame.c:1378 > #10 0x00000000004b4450 in x_connection_closed (dpy=dpy@entry=0x1378070, > error_message=, > error_message@entry=0x7fffbe39c450 "Connection lost to X server `:0'") > at xterm.c:7569 > #11 0x00000000004b44fc in x_io_error_quitter (display=0x1378070) > at xterm.c:7696 > #12 0x0000003f4de43cce in _XIOError () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 > #13 0x0000003f4de417ba in _XReadEvents () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 > #14 0x0000003f4de29e51 in XIfEvent () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 > #15 0x0000003f4de706e4 in _XimXRead () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 > #16 0x0000003f4de71330 in _XimReadData () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 > #17 0x0000003f4de71621 in _XimRead () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 > #18 0x0000003f4de600d6 in _XimProtoSetICValues () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 > #19 0x0000003f4de4e2ad in XSetICValues () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 > #20 0x00000000004c59b3 in xic_set_preeditarea (w=w@entry=0x479df28, > x=x@entry=55, y=y@entry=528) at xfns.c:2061 > #21 0x00000000004b4ce5 in x_draw_window_cursor (w=0x479df28, > glyph_row=, x=55, y=528, cursor_type=, > cursor_width=, on_p=, > active_p=) at xterm.c:7265 > #22 0x0000000000454fd3 in display_and_set_cursor (w=w@entry=0x479df28, > on=on@entry=true, hpos=5, vpos=24, x=55, y=528) at xdisp.c:26983 My reading of this is: Emacs was at the end of a redisplay cycle, when a call to an X function signaled an error because "Connection lost to X server `:0'". Then Emacs tried to delete the frame on that display, which again involves calls to X. Do you know why the connection was lost in the first place? Or is the complaint that when the connection is lost, Emacs hangs? From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:44 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Resent-From: Dmitry Antipov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii , Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.139176163932059 (code B ref 16676); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:28:01 +0000 Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2014 08:27:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54256 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBgmM-0008L0-Oo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 03:27:19 -0500 Received: from forward10l.mail.yandex.net ([84.201.143.143]:47924) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBgmJ-0008Kq-A9 for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 03:27:16 -0500 Received: from smtp1o.mail.yandex.net (smtp1o.mail.yandex.net [37.140.190.26]) by forward10l.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 31D15BA0DEF; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:27:13 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp1o.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id BE57CDE0EE1; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:27:12 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [37.139.80.10]) by smtp1o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id Sj8TxGC7AK-RCOiZMRE; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:27:12 +0400 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Yandex-Uniq: 65d5d10e-4d34-4aa7-954b-0d5c17a0a6a1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1391761632; bh=4vInC6mowm4+HKRnVAYu3hiBPemfHscB7Qkk/Gc+TpE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gXjI2rXM2JaZsF18TX0NCWhJ2U4Tg7vX8xRPd0AK7UjqVJPpAHvlivZ5qWCwD/BXK P7jsI3hos734E2SsmdtYow9SQbWeNOCYXlvzQVSZDfAQegm/CngbIHrjEchNyVvLSz /X6urfP8WbSVO6LRxBTQf6yk9CuW1VEg+nsM6u+c= Authentication-Results: smtp1o.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Message-ID: <52F498DE.6070008@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:27:10 +0400 From: Dmitry Antipov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On 02/07/2014 11:39 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > My reading of this is: Emacs was at the end of a redisplay cycle, when > a call to an X function signaled an error because "Connection lost to > X server `:0'". Then Emacs tried to delete the frame on that display, > which again involves calls to X. Yes, and I'm just curious why fatal X errors are handled in the same way as non-fatal (by x_connection_closed). IIUC if X connection is broken at the socket level, X protocol command may result in undefined behavior. Manual says that XIfEvent flushes an event queue and waits for an event matching the predicate; I don't know how the socket connection was broken exactly, but it was "broken enough" to wait forever. > Do you know why the connection was lost in the first place? Shouldn't we try to check errno x_io_error_quitter? Socket-related calls should set it in case of error. Dmitry From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:44 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 01:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.139182176619371 (code B ref 16676); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 01:10:01 +0000 Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 01:09:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55554 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBwQ9-00052M-Ck for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:09:26 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:42618) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBwQ6-00052B-RX for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:09:23 -0500 Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBwPs-0002a0-5i; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 02:09:08 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:08:00 -0800 In-Reply-To: <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:39:20 +0200") Message-ID: <87r47ecsy7.fsf@building.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1WBwPs-0002a0-5i X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392426549.09788@E8JFsFsf0C3y8Ti3/Ci3Og X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: > My reading of this is: Emacs was at the end of a redisplay cycle, when > a call to an X function signaled an error because "Connection lost to > X server `:0'". Then Emacs tried to delete the frame on that display, > which again involves calls to X. > > Do you know why the connection was lost in the first place? As far as I can tell, no X connection was lost. That is, the frame is still there, and I'm not trying to kill and frames or anything. This is in the middle of reading a Gnus group. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:44 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.139184934328154 (code B ref 16676); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:50:02 +0000 Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 08:49:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56369 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC3at-0007Jg-Ev for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:49:03 -0500 Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:57902) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC3ao-0007JR-9E for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:48:58 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0O001005R4FY00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:47:38 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N0O00O3D5RE9X20@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:47:38 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:48:35 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <87r47ecsy7.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <834n4axa58.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> <87r47ecsy7.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:08:00 -0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > My reading of this is: Emacs was at the end of a redisplay cycle, when > > a call to an X function signaled an error because "Connection lost to > > X server `:0'". Then Emacs tried to delete the frame on that display, > > which again involves calls to X. > > > > Do you know why the connection was lost in the first place? > > As far as I can tell, no X connection was lost. Xlib obviously thinks otherwise, the error message in the backtrace is very clear. From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:44 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.13918551176357 (code B ref 16676); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:26:02 +0000 Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 10:25:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56471 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC564-0001eQ-MP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:25:17 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:40586) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC561-0001eH-GI for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:25:14 -0500 Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WC55n-0000t1-CC; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:24:59 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> <87r47ecsy7.fsf@building.gnus.org> <834n4axa58.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 02:23:50 -0800 In-Reply-To: <834n4axa58.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:48:35 +0200") Message-ID: <8761opvr61.fsf@building.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1WC55n-0000t1-CC X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392459900.1105@0zcnDzwx3ZDwgZWbYPy+Zg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Xlib obviously thinks otherwise, the error message in the backtrace is > very clear. Well, might not something have scribbled something somewhere to make X believe the window is no longer viable? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:44 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , "Jan D." Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.13918570439885 (code B ref 16676); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:58:02 +0000 Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 10:57:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56502 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC5b5-0002ZB-Hp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:57:23 -0500 Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:58351) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC5b0-0002Yw-7d for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:57:18 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0O00800BLRA300@mtaout24.012.net.il> for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:56:24 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N0O006XPBQ0EX20@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:56:24 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:56:55 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <8761opvr61.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <83lhxlx47c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> <87r47ecsy7.fsf@building.gnus.org> <834n4axa58.fsf@gnu.org> <8761opvr61.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 02:23:50 -0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Xlib obviously thinks otherwise, the error message in the backtrace is > > very clear. > > Well, might not something have scribbled something somewhere to make X > believe the window is no longer viable? I'm not an expert on this, so I don't know. Jan, can you comment, please? From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:44 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Resent-From: "Jan D." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 16:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , "16676@debbugs.gnu.org" <16676@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.13918776378626 (code B ref 16676); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 16:41:02 +0000 Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 16:40:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58068 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCAxF-0002Ey-Q7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:40:37 -0500 Received: from mailfe04.swip.net ([212.247.154.97]:45998 helo=swip.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCAx9-0002Ei-94 for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:40:32 -0500 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE Received: from hosdjarv.se (account mj138573@tele2.se [46.59.42.57] verified) by mailfe04.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 473972005; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 17:40:21 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: "Jan D." X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11B554a) In-Reply-To: <83lhxlx47c.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 17:40:21 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <26DA7E1C-7874-41A1-B1CE-8E500EEA22CF@swipnet.se> References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> <87r47ecsy7.fsf@building.gnus.org> <834n4axa58.fsf@gnu.org> <8761opvr61.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83lhxlx47c.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hi. 8 feb 2014 kl. 11:56 skrev Eli Zaretskii : >> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen >> Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 02:23:50 -0800 >>=20 >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>=20 >>> Xlib obviously thinks otherwise, the error message in the backtrace is >>> very clear. >>=20 >> Well, might not something have scribbled something somewhere to make X >> believe the window is no longer viable? >=20 > I'm not an expert on this, so I don't know. Jan, can you comment, > please? The io error handler is only called for fatal errors. Any system call relat= ed to io in Xlib that fails triggers a call to the error handler. Xlib can not recover from this, so th= e connection is lost. If something writes garbage into Xlibs data, anything can happen. Jan D.=20= From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:44 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 17:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "Jan D." Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 16676@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.139188169216030 (code B ref 16676); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 17:49:02 +0000 Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 17:48:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58099 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCC0e-0004AR-7O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:48:11 -0500 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:59760) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCC0X-00049r-8k for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:48:06 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0O00I00UJMEG00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 19:47:59 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N0O00IJ3URYB660@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 19:47:59 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 19:47:53 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <26DA7E1C-7874-41A1-B1CE-8E500EEA22CF@swipnet.se> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <83bnyhwl6e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> <87r47ecsy7.fsf@building.gnus.org> <834n4axa58.fsf@gnu.org> <8761opvr61.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83lhxlx47c.fsf@gnu.org> <26DA7E1C-7874-41A1-B1CE-8E500EEA22CF@swipnet.se> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > From: "Jan D." > Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 17:40:21 +0100 > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , > "16676@debbugs.gnu.org" <16676@debbugs.gnu.org> > > The io error handler is only called for fatal errors. Any system call related to io in Xlib that fails > triggers a call to the error handler. Xlib can not recover from this, so the connection is lost. > If something writes garbage into Xlibs data, anything can happen. Is it wise to issue further X calls in this situation? Maybe we should skip X calls when we delete the frame as result of such problems. From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:44 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Resent-From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 16676@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.139188573122652 (code B ref 16676); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:56:02 +0000 Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 18:55:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58116 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCD3n-0005tB-Q8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:55:31 -0500 Received: from mailfe04.swip.net ([212.247.154.97]:52993 helo=swip.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCD3g-0005su-Bg for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:55:25 -0500 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 Received: from hosdjarv.se (account mj138573@tele2.se [46.59.42.57] verified) by mailfe04.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 473988617; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 19:55:13 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= In-Reply-To: <83bnyhwl6e.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 19:55:11 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <96715078-7AD1-4D91-A2DB-E88E2D05EB57@swipnet.se> References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> <87r47ecsy7.fsf@building.gnus.org> <834n4axa58.fsf@gnu.org> <8761opvr61.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83lhxlx47c.fsf@gnu.org> <26DA7E1C-7874-41A1-B1CE-8E500EEA22CF@swipnet.se> <83bnyhwl6e.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hi. 8 feb 2014 kl. 18:47 skrev Eli Zaretskii : >> From: "Jan D." >> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 17:40:21 +0100 >> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , >> "16676@debbugs.gnu.org" <16676@debbugs.gnu.org> >>=20 >> The io error handler is only called for fatal errors. Any system = call related to io in Xlib that fails >> triggers a call to the error handler. Xlib can not recover from = this, so the connection is lost. >> If something writes garbage into Xlibs data, anything can happen. >=20 > Is it wise to issue further X calls in this situation? Maybe we > should skip X calls when we delete the frame as result of such > problems. No, you can not do any calls. In fact, if the I/O error handler = returns, Xlib does exit. That is why x_connection_closed does a longjump (throws an error). Jan D. From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:44 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.14159794681771 (code B ref 16676); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:38:02 +0000 Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2014 15:37:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60914 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XpIwS-0000SR-8P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:37:48 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:46193) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XpIwK-0000Rs-EH for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:37:40 -0500 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XpIvx-00070Q-5Z for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:37:13 +0100 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Joni Mitchell's _Chalk Mark In A Rain Storm_: "The Beat of Black Wings" X-Hashcash: 1:23:141114:16676@debbugs.gnu.org::ocN9isg8U4hijugt:00000000000000000000000000000000000000007sYQ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:37:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 06 Feb 2014 16:53:28 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1XpIvx-00070Q-5Z X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-SpamScore: s X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1416584233.26181@iLMljfkY0bA9c2zrSskB1A X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > This has happened to me a handful of times now. I'm reading news, and > then Emacs will suddenly halt. > > Connecting to Emacs with gdb gives me the backtrace below. Emacs will > consume 100% CPU at this point. > > I've got the Emacs connected to gdb if anybody wants me to output some > data values... > > #0 0x0000003f4de29e3c in XIfEvent () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 > #1 0x0000003f4de706e4 in _XimXRead () from /lib64/libX11.so.6 I haven't seen this problem for half a year now, so I'm closing this report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 14 10:37:41 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2014 15:37:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60912 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XpIwO-0000S8-Fj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:37:40 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:46194) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XpIwM-0000Rt-Gq for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:37:39 -0500 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XpIw1-00070l-Gk for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:37:17 +0100 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:37:17 +0100 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #16676 X-MailScanner-ID: 1XpIw1-00070l-Gk X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1416584238.34237@5X6lb2/dnIYOywFjLgn+MQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) tags 16676 fixed close 16676