GNU bug report logs - #16669
rm: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior (POSIX issue)

Previous Next

Full log

Message #14 received at 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
Cc: 16669 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#16669: inconsistent 'rm -ir' prompting behavior
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:44:11 +0000

On 02/06/2014 04:39 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On today's Austin Group call, we discussed
> http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=802 regarding 'rm' behavior.
> 
> They pointed out that GNU has an optimization not allowed by a strict
> reading of the current standard:
> 
> $ mkdir foo
> $ rm -ir foo
> rm: remove directory ‘foo’?
> 
> Whether you answer yes or no, the point remains: rm only prompted once
> about removing the empty directory

[snip]

> Conversely, consider:
> 
> $ rm -ir foo
> rm: descend into directory ‘foo’? y
> rm: remove regular empty file ‘foo/bar’? n
> rm: remove directory ‘foo’? y
> rm: cannot remove ‘foo’: Directory not empty
> 
> Why on earth are we prompting to remove 'foo' when we KNOW it is
> non-empty because the user specifically asked to not remove foo/bar?  If
> we can optimize from two prompts down to one for the empty directory
> case, why are we not optimizing and avoiding asking a useless prompt for
> a known non-empty directory?

The different handling could be useful I think.

When we determine there are no files in a dir,
then only one prompt is necessary.

If we determine files are present a separate prompt
is useful to cater for the following sequence
in terminal 1 and terminal 2.

1> $ rm -ir foo
1> rm: descend into directory ‘foo’? y
1> rm: remove regular empty file ‘foo/bar’? n
1> rm: remove directory ‘foo’?

2> mv foo/bar /safe/foo  # Handle this unknown file _independently_

1> y

thanks,
Pádraig.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.