From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:17:11 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#16657 <16657@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#16657 <16657@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH] Detect XTerm versions for non-VT100 emulation modes Reply-To: bug#16657 <16657@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 15:17:11 +0000 retitle 16657 [PATCH] Detect XTerm versions for non-VT100 emulation modes reassign 16657 emacs submitter 16657 "W. Trevor King" severity 16657 normal tag 16657 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 05 11:49:54 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2014 16:49:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51101 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WB5fa-0001uD-ME for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:49:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53015) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WB5et-0001sj-1G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:49:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB5el-0007uK-J8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:49:06 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:37116) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB5el-0007uG-FY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:48:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54675) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB5ee-0002mz-SX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:48:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB5eY-0007rA-8d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:48:52 -0500 Received: from qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.40]:37125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB5eY-0007r6-2Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:48:46 -0500 Received: from omta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.59]) by qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NcbK1n0071GhbT854golx7; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:48:45 +0000 Received: from odin.tremily.us ([24.18.63.50]) by omta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Ngok1n008152l3L3TgokjY; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:48:45 +0000 Received: from mjolnir.tremily.us (unknown [192.168.0.140]) by odin.tremily.us (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDDCBFEA56C; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 08:48:43 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 11218 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:47:44 -0000 From: "W. Trevor King" To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] Detect XTerm versions for non-VT100 emulation modes Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 08:47:39 -0800 Message-Id: <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591023.git.wking@tremily.us> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.5.2.8.g0f6c0d1 In-Reply-To: <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591022.git.wking@tremily.us> References: <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591022.git.wking@tremily.us> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1391618925; bh=uLMXRm7WxAfLx7y9rrOy6CbuJGw9R9MN/jBj5JuAkrI=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-Id; b=tAp9OchHF8l0pBypHl28YdrZAGJPgZoM7Y4vKk0UV+zwf6evz+2vQrNNbEYl/yio4 aKhVqwiuuKkhI38FjPMXp8+unq3/GQ+DA7eTrirom4OYZCNreQG95i5cqMN40Y3KDw WgWAbDjps9XTrHnBlvNch0noydr1HiRigPxdTKsOMR2Tn0tpZMXwiGs+3xgMUrseLX cSI/tIwF93Aibj9AkzK9iSmvT8fxU+07aB36xhAf7ZR7Mp8LJr6Vq71WFCrbUmZBiy Ooi/K4Pgs2Oicm5Ic+PDdEkueamCVS4YT3kE39RdPw8turWJDybWh5yyyctKCb21Ne KENljSCaPeLrQ== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:49:48 -0500 Cc: "W. Trevor King" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) * term/xterm.el (xterm--version-handler): Handle cases where the terminal type is not zero. The three numbers in the {CSI}>{Ps}c response are: Pp (terminal type), Pv (firmware version), and Pc (always zero for xterm). Before this commit, Emacs only looked at Pv if Pp was zero (VT100). However, for XTerm v280 and later, the default emulation is for VT420 (Pp = 41). See the XTerm changelog for details: http://invisible-island.net/xterm/xterm.log-contents.html#xterm_280 --- I sent this in a few hours ago, but it doesn't look like it made it to the list. I wasn't subscribed to the list then, so it's possible the original is queued for moderator approval. I didn't get any message to that effect though, so I just signed up and am sending this resubmission ;). Another useful link (the source for my control code information) is http://invisible-island.net/xterm/ctlseqs/ctlseqs.html, but I didn't work that into my commit message. Let me know if that's worth a resubmit. Cheers, Trevor lisp/term/xterm.el | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/term/xterm.el b/lisp/term/xterm.el index 87f8c96..3d1b28b 100644 --- a/lisp/term/xterm.el +++ b/lisp/term/xterm.el @@ -500,8 +500,8 @@ The relevant features are: ;; see if by using a longer timeout we get rid of most issues. (while (and (setq chr (read-event nil nil 2)) (not (equal chr ?c))) (setq str (concat str (string chr)))) - (when (string-match "0;\\([0-9]+\\);0" str) - (let ((version (string-to-number (match-string 1 str)))) + (when (string-match "\\([0-9]+\\);\\([0-9]+\\);0" str) + (let ((version (string-to-number (match-string 2 str)))) ;; If version is 242 or higher, assume the xterm supports ;; reporting the background color (TODO: maybe earlier ;; versions do too...) -- 1.8.5.2.8.g0f6c0d1 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 05 16:40:29 2014 Received: (at 16657) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2014 21:40:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51306 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBACr-0002DF-55 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:40:29 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:40220) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBACn-0002Cz-OY for 16657@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:40:26 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBACm-0002a7-K1; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:40:24 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: "W. Trevor King" Subject: Re: bug#16657: [PATCH] Detect XTerm versions for non-VT100 emulation modes References: <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591022.git.wking@tremily.us> <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591023.git.wking@tremily.us> X-Spook: Mantis Glock beanpole ASDIC Jyllandsposten CID Attorney X-Ran: &shHupQBKiTnD!RH:PEWy$hM__r?lN&w3AAqBf;@L0NWmZ{3zfMWNzTe;AD%~'2,lIK+Ac X-Hue: magenta X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:40:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591023.git.wking@tremily.us> (W. Trevor King's message of "Wed, 5 Feb 2014 08:47:39 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16657 Cc: 16657@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) "W. Trevor King" wrote: > so it's possible the original is queued for moderator approval. Exactly. (There is no need to subscribe just to post BTW.) > I didn't get any message to that effect though, so I just signed up > and am sending this resubmission ;). A better procedure is just to wait a bit. We don't send out "your message is held for moderation" notices, since most things that get held for moderation are spam. Anyway, I will delete http://debbugs.gnu.org/16656 since it is a duplicate of this. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 06 11:24:52 2014 Received: (at 16657) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2014 16:24:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53571 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBRkx-0007W5-5c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:24:51 -0500 Received: from qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.17]:47698) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBRkt-0007Vu-F0 for 16657@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:24:48 -0500 Received: from omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NzzD1n0010bG4ec5A4Qn0q; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 16:24:47 +0000 Received: from odin.tremily.us ([24.18.63.50]) by omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id P4Ql1n00s152l3L3P4Qmdk; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 16:24:47 +0000 Received: by odin.tremily.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 70FC4FEF6DA; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:24:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tremily.us; s=odin; t=1391703885; bh=iJjF50PAyJLfW5uOVn7tjQuPLOvji4SfVc9AilrjKxQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=gB0Hi2h4GGqL9N0Q3FAswLiCxODeA4Tjbs8XLlVDheXqmqdvEVAocZOa3UFj59iF4 MA07KEhDpnpld+Wrqwo5a5zVldHWPMP2WATmjmhpHgjZahunMQR4cuJ/2/t5yc+e6L kPqWITodgRYbKQ4O0bB8h+HLuOtPcEiVpPmH7G3s= Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:24:45 -0800 From: "W. Trevor King" To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#16657: [PATCH] Detect XTerm versions for non-VT100 emulation modes Message-ID: <20140206162445.GO14197@odin.tremily.us> References: <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591022.git.wking@tremily.us> <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591023.git.wking@tremily.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xQILpJsL5cebVBoz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=39A2F3FA2AB17E5D8764F388FC29BDCDF15F5BE8; url=http://tremily.us/pubkey.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1391703887; bh=iuScoNfx8Fd+BiZjajzehu8T0iQ5P2vkvrUMRr4GV/Y=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=S0MuAP4iARfCXXT97vUFacfn0QaaSgTQ1gCz+JZbuHUgSTKDnVm8MQrVoOsum06+h Jj5J8a83B4TCJ1wlxOLw8p2+XCZ/j2TawlWSyOWjssSx/X3389y/voPnjAlM2rEI3m nhr6/nverkO6u/AdNVrBfKYd8bHIYKbqV7mR4hg/RJylAgpQRhwBLeRhcpfDpkzBRN 6EkxbA0TTKs167gzRIYsVQnHr8+LZ/x07EFjUY+Su6yCqEJF2jdwWKAU4T3Jtb6hki TwiD95gpCHH7ajM9dJtphE7uhsZFRTRi4PNyijGXx7YaGDPUaiRpTHrPgQYMqEm0Os BxbNyJSlqnTbg== X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16657 Cc: 16657@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) --xQILpJsL5cebVBoz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 04:40:24PM -0500, Glenn Morris wrote: > "W. Trevor King" wrote: > > so it's possible the original is queued for moderator approval. >=20 > Exactly. (There is no need to subscribe just to post BTW.) A note somewhere ([1], [2], or [3]?) that makes this explicit would be nice. > > I didn't get any message to that effect though, so I just signed > > up and am sending this resubmission ;). >=20 > A better procedure is just to wait a bit. Sorry. I was too excited at figuring out why my background-mode wasn't dark :p. I'll be more patient next time. > Anyway, I will delete >=20 > http://debbugs.gnu.org/16656 >=20 > since it is a duplicate of this. Thanks, Trevor [1]: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs [2]: http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Contributing.= html [3]: http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/CONTRIBUTE --=20 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy --xQILpJsL5cebVBoz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS87dLAAoJEKKfehoaNkbtRNwP/2emid+0CMbJ4epUZ9n+8/jz 4V4SKv3gj+W0dtPrKqKl2g3+MunKYq4EPap7xtSFByjPVrfWlLkxFg8xzWGvGOsV VAzC3gToro4nXrBtMMvneopB5TZgvVrgh+9DvrH8kGOqZxDBuLRuFpyHTxrYMe4r YrT/Kus+4S41IXQK8dUSryw0IuXfhEDOLf1ihP0Gpl5gof50rRPxZcODJWX3DG7b em+X11Myb5trTbWKbt8v5pasZvklTyiQhZQiDeo5VnYmfOsXcDu4eRen8S+cdIar qGfgeDN5wN785HEOxd7ZCoZD2+zEi5Wk3HkYwC1K5AeEwIgDijCaFELQTHAr7FWE YgiD+cg8AvL4Tr0DhPHx9ck5G6b43DHGZNSwnb4K4pXcAQzkxARK0Qakch+xG2LE lb2AJjWmi75AZO+mi5rr+i17UTsdAgE3T2V/rqMWfEFT/2cZIM+2Ny400fViHMZT 1AU1mD+5OU1J6DZLRi1KMQs8x6VJFOD6IeSnMo/hRSUR7hwWq+y719yL+mP0lVPH TxvOO+6dav0CiVVkBQ7uV3aXrHnll1mMswLza5ma/676rpgXHA4mOw099quGY8uB 0j3C4fU0xHNm/+wYQ588y0Ez8Z2ESxnKQrTqDJlKBeVxDucBaxHwQ5nvlvkcsMoM 8Z1vMI+Qt62IDe0kWMJe =tNRP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xQILpJsL5cebVBoz-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 06 15:22:19 2014 Received: (at 16657) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2014 20:22:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53734 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBVSl-0007nU-6B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 15:22:19 -0500 Received: from qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.56]:59734) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBVSi-0007nL-Eu for 16657@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 15:22:17 -0500 Received: from omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.60]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id P7s41n0021HzFnQ568NFuB; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 20:22:15 +0000 Received: from odin.tremily.us ([24.18.63.50]) by omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id P8NE1n00C152l3L3a8NFgl; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 20:22:15 +0000 Received: by odin.tremily.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 10BCFFF1790; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:22:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tremily.us; s=odin; t=1391718134; bh=sngNOkcWE2c4NT0TMjwgyXckzrZN7iVSNsTxlc9N2Dc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=STmpeD2UvqRHJzOCXixhuOAamZLMcomgZJp181J76fzIa5GXy7nOJ1WY1NvsIbVUT +8E0DwiCtoD8HGPaPlNsz/Ny8nzSAbY06xjmLTQ9vCdlfbSu4+CppO1petmEn8WE/2 /rVDJLY/FyyfYIISPSetPIcOlKS5JCrhYw1T/epw= Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:22:13 -0800 From: "W. Trevor King" To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#16657: [PATCH] Detect XTerm versions for non-VT100 emulation modes Message-ID: <20140206202213.GS14197@odin.tremily.us> References: <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591022.git.wking@tremily.us> <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591023.git.wking@tremily.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HZ7qEtS5/73aILfs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=39A2F3FA2AB17E5D8764F388FC29BDCDF15F5BE8; url=http://tremily.us/pubkey.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1391718135; bh=kOl6LFOX7TGWAmmgmebYk44+ImbsccaBsEyYscV0aXo=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sQM4cWJxSsMMXWC2Bf1BglH1owlF/GFET4/N8ey/tVIVknxZ7WNMz9XCSzAm9LDpZ 54EbCfIzN8IX2Lo81+DAeqUBLZ26Th3jWMAE1YZa+3oEF0fCszsq0cUrXdKpobR/2a ngJpAIcgEF3cKIn0yzVhL6ERj7HP1dZvxnHaV0MZan4QgaFf1Q6sn9+kJqE46Er7cj XymRWOGdiVgXNq5jpzxNflugU1J1yFnTsaVik0jrDMzDHZkDh+BC4OYHJxvX2o7SK6 k7BBMz3yvpEgxDR5sR0VLMGluuLVjKgJsiQ9pdC2ehUKRFroPPAXwSOeklyfNxzuh0 m6pm1dNXzCD9A== X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16657 Cc: 16657@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) --HZ7qEtS5/73aILfs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline This issue is also mentioned in some of the comments from the tail of #13839 [1,2,3]. Victor even quoted the XTerm changelog :p. I don't see a patch for this particular issue in #13839, although Stefan posts a patch for some other keymap stuff, and Victor floats an alternate regexp [1]. [1]: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13839#11 [2]: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13839#14 [3]: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13839#17 --HZ7qEtS5/73aILfs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS8+7yAAoJEKKfehoaNkbtzj8QAKHU9JaxBSKUqLqY4kP0muSs 4TCFwOwS/dS9J5uhbBkobMhYEYTQ4sL2AyT4GOhCF07svt0aVY39ZNsbx553uqGj k6+ZjgeTFNkN5VpGcx0IOWaTdzJS25ZZ8SWU02iJ+cV2kEvGAUPXr+gQVMofglLl MphGT571UcKt3fLtmxoJRvQ4XzmvaTu+rfesd9N5RUlPjxkzySE9SD4ZNIGYoRYj TXztMqyblDe8xCy0V+eHBXiAX6vHvdzxN1k8SYVqXfAZHE4LQd1FL8s5qkuVNew0 4M+BuHeIAURfL9ksGT+y+mpOwyFxmf7gF4ncTYSYvbDqavI3TdZqA5muaBao3Ho9 oLg+m/Ed3uFch3m2Gp3X+5EJGWVXraPoqny/CsNXJ3txWQAFGtpbUBLyV+HPFOhh qmrDJLcyupE1P314fSQsAKdWxqJ5eD+6Z/Yal8DBOgWP7LZdZRrgLAMIAThlLMdC eVKH1Qgs/VyklF1rPhD3YPrDejp7HQOOUoeNiZl3f43Yz+A28gE8fWHpnz9CHKuD jyH2MxBGsWo8AfrF7aZfdGdc7+jWQdFy8jVcM9r0V5qtMlE3PJs8AG343i64GRB2 +kFxvYwCA5cEeM3fXlDv4YqEQAS2Q4rZ+RCvqGT9rhz2YyyDE5ZoSXVsE3WTFMpc 0gVSgetGb9+FLZxTwgUx =FhIU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HZ7qEtS5/73aILfs-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 06 22:39:39 2014 Received: (at 16657) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2014 03:39:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54011 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBcHz-0004dx-4J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:39:39 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:44699) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBcHw-0004do-7e for 16657@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:39:36 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBcHv-0005Ud-0l; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:39:35 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: "W. Trevor King" Subject: Re: bug#16657: [PATCH] Detect XTerm versions for non-VT100 emulation modes References: <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591022.git.wking@tremily.us> <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591023.git.wking@tremily.us> <20140206162445.GO14197@odin.tremily.us> X-Spook: infowar Steve Case 9/11 BLU-97 A/B CipherTAC-2000 X-Ran: *juYYjCE#N6>pppz*{R2HU|^_FK*I+q5k{fK+y{)fQ4NUu^C (W. Trevor King's message of "Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:24:45 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16657 Cc: 16657@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) "W. Trevor King" wrote: > A note somewhere ([1], [2], or [3]?) that makes this explicit would be > nice. What I am saying is common to basically every GNU mailing list. Even if you subscribe, you still need to wait for moderation at least the first time. I think/hope this is standard practice for all sane public mailing lists. Ie, everybody except Debian's? ;) FWIW, "Checklist for Bug Reports" http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Checklist.html does say "Submissions are moderated, so there may be a delay before your report appears." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 07 00:20:53 2014 Received: (at 16657) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2014 05:20:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBdrw-00014Q-KK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:20:52 -0500 Received: from qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.80]:38760) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBdrr-00014A-D6 for 16657@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:20:51 -0500 Received: from omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id PHH41n00417dt5G58HLmt3; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 05:20:46 +0000 Received: from odin.tremily.us ([24.18.63.50]) by omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id PHLl1n00P152l3L3ZHLmdN; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 05:20:46 +0000 Received: by odin.tremily.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CC1B7FF7A3E; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:20:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tremily.us; s=odin; t=1391750444; bh=VNRaDfy8KFvrawLPNWdod45Ri/gRbJ/lbkqn4zPpGYg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Upj7+rcezp1oINsnpMc/a1j3jRg6gfhTeESg4ebFkb2BkFkUp79BbBWhMJwvstuKR JT16KM6qR6wKdHqJS4RPcVlS7Dqq6ru3WzKagf+vR0UTALKYt0u59hOHufVCGdaMbt Lft1R18RSwcn8bMHsG+kFcCJBNxqvhANBxfMEYO0= Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:20:44 -0800 From: "W. Trevor King" To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#16657: [PATCH] Detect XTerm versions for non-VT100 emulation modes Message-ID: <20140207052044.GU14197@odin.tremily.us> References: <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591022.git.wking@tremily.us> <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591023.git.wking@tremily.us> <20140206162445.GO14197@odin.tremily.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s7abKhQEY9RNP/Gm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=39A2F3FA2AB17E5D8764F388FC29BDCDF15F5BE8; url=http://tremily.us/pubkey.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1391750446; bh=GNw/0aCKQxV8CZap6LheymnsP3+fJK+MuMeJq/0URvc=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=H5qVKRPkmIwWgoQxF3yDjFK77YTLlrbM4LKVND8vEXbyqSqTOLzFqV6BWRSCpIE1W 4GmqBYsj66HTXq92ZYKRW/oPUFGdfhXrvYt3F6U2G7UV7P/Jf9UhoTAIMhokK7wNkf ZDVc1L7Vo6n8gTV8cC35AOKnVSE8p4vS4Og8c05lI/OWayH+sgZQYRdSbTc1HiPCCe DQFAQMyc+ADJlnmmjTfoiU3t8n+Mb0TXLy4/mVpP16BOrgC2MIu68Y9UiwFNYE4Sxk CVXQXRv6w0PGKsiRci9zghcQlR2i4agBBeg2HWQWayNHd47+6P0jZ+rttZrXEGaSbB W6cJXjnOqUQ4A== X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16657 Cc: 16657@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) --s7abKhQEY9RNP/Gm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:39:34PM -0500, Glenn Morris wrote: > FWIW, "Checklist for Bug Reports" >=20 > http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Checklist.html >=20 > does say "Submissions are moderated, so there may be a delay before your > report appears." Ah, it certainly does. Sorry I missed that. --s7abKhQEY9RNP/Gm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS9G0qAAoJEKKfehoaNkbtIw0P/0Q2frDpp+TcRGJ/05iC18aB J7s5aW/dqSuUVx3dVN/eNqLahOf0osUTUl+ctipINMTHB3Gv5XJ6AIVvwb71fwLe T2umun/7MuEFZez2ECeXtT4LA9GKwBRyUef/K2EnjiaMgb/8bRzzsgKaK//VMKbH OoEtcYA+OC1LWGEtXXGszElzWiISrePP2AjgQvdkFLaPV3n2M379uiIzkjFL6YS2 Rhjg1QB/yh3hQhUZqLUkVOPDDWrf9/cwPHxhDwn9C21ZxgGEZAelAfJKUQq1ROif pjEJdUnUDArLAjGf3neTXUYGeXyK3WERnohUcWCCWtnpyQy9jkXX5yvY2kny+ZkV ivflQNAbVmi5MqrA3EUbzSWFPYMucdjJTko/o3qq0pwcWxAtroCMKSQtrBV3/fqH k0uh7EkvJbuR72N96y3AdKI8HFme9G0SA/RBgFtgOyLwjfBTbxQHIVJFMagdQoNd bNa530Vy6gIa7MYzWOwmog33f5c2Y8ap2FhkXGshP1o0cH3UM1vMnR+nKBP1iCHV wD/FZhr7PsJ0rFkg4Zs9ZJmDYBXStRMIQZioaVwipmUv8IRSMmM6A7BwYLfwQmPj ybt7S4y7FOrkR/czrZB46nE9yfkwEQBxjThixxV1xUJWJFLV37O2kGftqllfkwFz GkBr3UD4AVd7167g2w1h =qzDH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s7abKhQEY9RNP/Gm-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 19 14:17:34 2014 Received: (at 16657) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2014 19:17:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60598 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGCeD-0005u5-Ki for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:17:34 -0500 Received: from qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.40]:55730) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGCeA-0005tp-I9 for 16657@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:17:31 -0500 Received: from omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.12]) by qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id UJcH1n0030Fqzac54KHR0Y; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 19:17:25 +0000 Received: from odin.tremily.us ([24.18.63.50]) by omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id UKHP1n00a152l3L3UKHQEP; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 19:17:25 +0000 Received: by odin.tremily.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8E7F3104DD35; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:17:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tremily.us; s=odin; t=1392837443; bh=eF8nHZEnPsPmAyLmxj00d3MPfMOeR78untESEvXtP8g=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Cpb7Wk+pFpPVav+iZAH4jobfFHEnSw5rEhChg73tJ7nGq8OHz2JCyXxUhnHobXYl6 KDMTimhy2br+KsWHR8S2sh7Ij8t7Ey5X7I8vC0vxtwqs7ioXmfjENxELAadWeeBy12 EIkl4ifuNoYCdp5NmadQTwjUBTHMtEV3Ee1gN63E= Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:17:23 -0800 From: "W. Trevor King" To: 16657@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#16657: [PATCH] Detect XTerm versions for non-VT100 emulation modes Message-ID: <20140219191723.GM7538@odin.tremily.us> References: <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591022.git.wking@tremily.us> <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591023.git.wking@tremily.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+7qMzvEgojnlfQ4q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591023.git.wking@tremily.us> OpenPGP: id=39A2F3FA2AB17E5D8764F388FC29BDCDF15F5BE8; url=http://tremily.us/pubkey.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1392837445; bh=cbpgypAuu8T9RnBrJwScJvaOZw6pWUtntHRqcphrWUQ=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CYH3nj2+nDmb0I6C3drga+TBnxxYNpWLMusijwMB0jcZVBHr+Vqbez4PyU+jzYJLd 2986BPJlirIYdD98wUxTaIBd3T5KaoB13deIUoWXn5g1xFkfs5HrTktlud6kbTsMp4 uRfe2pkwxtwylDcMenb5/mKOp1PS29i3qu4F85MXdPdYLt5nr90PJE6vZMJJK1yx0I MCwqBk+XV4CWycNgkiji7WIX4Lja0I3C7i8ZYTxr2cMxzWD7fRcvtdLvl5u9VOOisu EUCZoYTfAQo6R5suodoq6jlXpCB0y3AF9F9mulIUfH5bPuHBTsjHIhJc7oy3Ghb8fF eIAKu4RonprnA== X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16657 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) --+7qMzvEgojnlfQ4q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is there anything I can do to help this along? I'm happy to add clarifying information to the commit message if that would help. In 13839, Stefan expressed concern over non-XTerms that claim to be XTerm [1]: On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 14:25:30 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > More specifically, I'm concerned that by accepting any "P p" number, > we might end up trying to use a feature that's not supported by the > underlying terminal emulator because it happens to have version > numbers that are higher than those of "the usual xterm". Lacking a spec for XTerm impersonators, it's hard to address this directly. However, as it stands, version detection is broken for XTerm =E2=89=A5 v280, and I think that fixing that known breakage for the t= rue XTerm is more important than avoiding hypothetical breakage for impersonators. Are there other concerns with the logic here? If so, what sort of research might help clear them up? Are there some common impersonators that I should investigate directly? Cheers, Trevor [1]: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D13839#14 --=20 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy --+7qMzvEgojnlfQ4q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTBQNAAAoJEKKfehoaNkbtpDYQAJijUqkvMEIwQvRHcFihHjfm MmZ1ZHL5D7R6erIWArTXrN4AKYYgSFthd4/CV2B4yA2YcZE8Nb1bJJ5SZXsn6Jih 9nw+PkQTz/fsoYrNoZmOugY72e78D1OfsfSubKFTd67Igj1Y1HSn1oTGUbU1z3i7 oJ/K/4prhNblUp4d6S6kzkuhWNx7u0QyyZ/1KFIykPRCHvnltTpHgWHmpI9QuIkz Qif0fEKh8DuzmasqikBpYzzVVMlJND6pTe/v2uIUIyn1KhDbAKlvir/fhm5QBvB5 ri5qoUlOf3ya++7jF+PGC2rMI18cJlmMj/faZE+MElkjWSBjTOrvcBA1e0GZR++D FncuG3pxBjRWIEl+yuK7EVHDJRH6rXHWu82B0ghXEbFjusJWfrxIlNCCMT7G+8Kw Er2DJYXyHivuwPz8T2CMJn2awF2RixOV8yYJzteK/UV+R/VkScS4A23jNyqUnWKX K3UfXyWmj/ZDCWRs03doWrB8jHZW/dF/7VcxUV6ZhvwdW5ATlxqWu7+50tpO+8sV ZjG5gYI1YILb+0iLaO2thamtlRpCknf0J5FaLwNfZWowHv3CFlGswoCGRD58DUpt l+YZRNaSl1lgYNvjDIC+AqAm9tzi37/Nrz/UhSA1NFkpmCH+miY/ywEgFe7nTfAG iuCcCfZoAhBuHfMBJNvU =6S/7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+7qMzvEgojnlfQ4q-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 19 14:58:59 2014 Received: (at 16657) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2014 19:58:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60647 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGDII-00073w-OV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:58:59 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:54935) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGDIG-00073d-U1 for 16657@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:58:57 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFLd/8D/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFLd/8D/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="48166165" Received: from 75-119-255-3.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.255.3]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 19 Feb 2014 14:58:51 -0500 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 27FFC60142; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:58:51 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: "W. Trevor King" Subject: Re: bug#16657: [PATCH] Detect XTerm versions for non-VT100 emulation modes Message-ID: References: <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591022.git.wking@tremily.us> <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591023.git.wking@tremily.us> <20140219191723.GM7538@odin.tremily.us> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:58:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140219191723.GM7538@odin.tremily.us> (W. Trevor King's message of "Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:17:23 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16657 Cc: 16657@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) > Is there anything I can do to help this along? Do you have a few spare hours, maybe? Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 19 23:46:03 2014 Received: (at 16657-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2014 04:46:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32846 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGLWN-00059S-He for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 23:46:03 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:18055) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGLWL-00058j-J3 for 16657-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 23:46:02 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFLd/o4/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IfAQVWIxALNBIUGA0kiCQMwSGRCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFLd/o4/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IfAQVWIxALNBIUGA0kiCQMwSGRCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="48208203" Received: from 75-119-250-56.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.250.56]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 19 Feb 2014 23:45:55 -0500 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7E2146336B; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 23:45:55 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: "W. Trevor King" Subject: Re: bug#16657: [PATCH] Detect XTerm versions for non-VT100 emulation modes Message-ID: References: <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591022.git.wking@tremily.us> <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591023.git.wking@tremily.us> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 23:45:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <01e801b917954436b4bc557f78356975ae9c38f8.1391591023.git.wking@tremily.us> (W. Trevor King's message of "Wed, 5 Feb 2014 08:47:39 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16657-done Cc: 16657-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) > * term/xterm.el (xterm--version-handler): Handle cases where the > terminal type is not zero. The three numbers in the {CSI}>{Ps}c > response are: Pp (terminal type), Pv (firmware version), and Pc > (always zero for xterm). Before this commit, Emacs only looked at > Pv if Pp was zero (VT100). However, for XTerm v280 and later, the > default emulation is for VT420 (Pp = 41). See the XTerm changelog > for details: > http://invisible-island.net/xterm/xterm.log-contents.html#xterm_280 Thanks, I installed your patch. Stefan From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:17:11 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator